O semiotycznej i intersemiotycznej roli tematu głównego. Od syntezy dziejów narodu polskiego do malarstwa realistycznego i nowoczesnego

Maciej Czerwiński




Abstract

In the article the problem of semiosis of the global topie in verbal and visual texts is taken into consideration. In the first section a theoretical framework is introduced, in the second verbal text (i.e. the genre of the synthesis of Polish national history) is elaborated, in the third the similar discussion on visual ‘texts’ is conducted, while in the fourth section finał remarks are provided with additional suggestions conceming further investigations.The opening remarks concem the very idea of the topie in verbal texts, notably in historical texts (the operational term finał—taken from semiotic works of Boris Uspienski - is introduced). The finał - interrelated with the global topie and genre - organizes the whole historical narration and establishes its cohesion; their overwhelming presence enables grasping the very act of data interpretation. Every event or historical figurę conceptualized in a historical narration (for instance the Prussian Homage in 1525 or Polish king Sigismund) receives its own meaning only insofar as it maintains its constant relation with the global topie expressed by the title (top-down and bottom-up mechanisms).There are some similarities that the title and global topie possess in the acts of interpretation of painting, notably realistic representations of historical events. For example a piece of Jan Matejko entitled Hołd Pruski (Prussian Homage) imposes on an observer a set of connotative features deeply rooted in the Polish imaginery encoded in language and structured by the national narration. This particular example opens up a discussion about the function of the verbal title and visual ‘text’ in pieces of Giorgione, Rene Magritte, Kazimierz Malewicz, Marek Rostworowski.The analysis is not finished; it only sketches a very generał problem of interrelation of verbal and visual codes that could be analyzed within the field of semiotics and semiotics of culture.

Keywords:

semiotics, semiotics of culture, historical text, painting, image, verbal codes, visual codes

Auerbach E., 1968 [1946], Mimesis. Rzeczywistość przedstawiona w literaturze Zachodu, Z. Żabicki, tłum., Warszawa.

Białostocki J., 2008, Wybór pism estetycznych, Kraków.

Brikner Klaus (2009 [2000]), Analiza strukturalna tekstu. — Lingwistyka tekstu w Niemczech, I. Szwed, tłum., Z. Bilut-Homplewicz, W. Czachur, M. Smykała, red., Wrocław.

Czerwiński M., 2007, Dyskursy i ich porządek w społecznej heteroglosji, „Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej”, 42, s. 247-268.

Czerwiński M., 2008, Kultura jako znakotwórcza przestrzeń spotkania języków, „Studia z Filologii Polskiej i Słowiańskiej”, 43, s. 217-237.

Czerwiński Maciej, 2010a, Gatunek jest znakiem — uwagi na marginesie dyskusji o tekście historycznym, „Pamiętnik literacki”, 2, s. 179-196.

Czerwiński M., 2010b, Synteza dziejów narodu - zarys problematyki stylistycznej gatunku, „Studia z filologii polskiej i słowiańskiej”, 45, s. 99-118.

Duszak A., 1998, Tekst, dyskurs, komunikacja międzykulturowa, Warszawa.

Eco U., 2009 [1976], Teoria semiotyki, M. Czerwiński tłum., Kraków.

Eco U., 2010 [2007], Od drzewa do labiryntu. Studia historyczna o znaku i interpretacji, G. Jurkowaniec tłum., i. in., Warszawa.

Gajda St., 2004 [1982], Propozycja systematyki gatunków naukowych. - Akty i gatunki mowy, S. Niebrzegowska-Bartmińska, red., Lublin, s. 217-224.

Ingarden R., 1958, Studia z estetyki, II, Warszawa.

Pelc J., 1961, O pojęciu tematu, Wrocław.

Porębski M., 1972, Ikonosfera, Warszawa.

Porębski M., 1986, Sztuka a informacja, Kraków.

Rosner K., 1981, Semiotyka strukturalna w badaniach nad literaturą, Warszawa.

Topolski J., 2010 [2003], Historia Polski, Poznań.

Uspienski B., 1998, Semiotyka historii, tłum. B. Żyłko, Gdańsk.

van Dijk T., 2004 [1975], Działanie, opis działania a narracja. — Narratologia, M. Głowiński, red., M. B. Fedewicz, tłum., Gdańsk, s. 90-123

White H., 2000, Poetyka pisarstwa historycznego, E. Domańska, M. Wilczyński, red., tłum. E. Domańska i in., Kraków.

Wilkoń A., 2002, Spójność i struktura tekstu, Kraków.

Published
2021-01-21

Cited by

Czerwiński, M. (2021). O semiotycznej i intersemiotycznej roli tematu głównego. Od syntezy dziejów narodu polskiego do malarstwa realistycznego i nowoczesnego. Stylistyka, 20, 213–232. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3457

Authors

Maciej Czerwiński 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2011 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.