Mestoimeniâta v stilovete na b”lgarskiâ ezik
Mariâ Ilieva
Abstract
The stylistic peculiarities of the pronouns in the Bulgarian language are examined in the paper. The reasons for the attention towards the pronouns He in their poor studying as stylistic means as well as in their belonging to the Fnguistic universalities which gives an opportunity for observations in comparative and juxtaposing aspect. First of all, on the basis of materiał from the five functional styles, conclusions are drawn about the frequency of the pronominal use in each formation. By discussing the extra-linguistic reasons for the results the marked activity of the pronouns in the colloouial speech is ascertained vs. the сотрагабѵеіу Iow frequency of use in the business speech. The statistic data are based on a body of 150 000 units for each style, fhe author quote< data conceminj the functioning of the separate groups of pronouns in the five func*'onal styles and the data are bound to the indication bookishness of the texts.
The second problem which is discussed in the paper is the axiological and intensification use of the pronouns in the colloquial speech. On the basis of their distribution on the scalę us / them the assessment uses are described which are connected with the oppositions near / far, definite / indefmite, man I not man. As a result of the analysis of the cited examples the equalization of the oppositions us 'them and good / bad in the use of linguistic means is determined. Part of the examples have counterparts in other languages as for instance ii i the Polish language and this provides the opportunity to formulate the hypothe^is of universality in the assessment uses of the pronouns in the various languages as well.
Keywords:
pronouns, colloąuial speech, reąuency, functional styles, extra-linguistic factors, connotation, opposition, assessment, intensification, depersonalizationReferences
Апресян Ю.Д., 1986, Деиксш. в лексике и грамматике и наивная модель мира. - Семиотика и информатика, вып. 28, 5-33.
Бондаренко,В. Н., 1483, Отрицание как логико-грамматическая категория, Москва.
Буров Ст, 1998, Бележки заупотребата на нарицателните сыцествителни имена за лица като прагматически оператори в изказването. — Славистични проучвания, В. Търново, под ред. на Н. Даска юв и др., 9- 25.
Илиева М., 2004, Българинът в своите местоимения, В. Тьрново.
Илиева М., 2005, Количествен анализ на местоименните ѵпотреби в стиловете на бьлгарския език, Варна.
Иосифова Р., Илиева, М., 1499, Стилистика. Теоретични бележки. Задачи и текстове за упражнения, В. Тьрново.
Корпус Николова, http:,/www.hf.uio.no/easteur-orient/bulg/matNikolova
Костов Н., 1939, Българска граматика, София.
Николова Цв., 1987, Честотен речник на бьлгарската разговорна реч, София.
Ницолова Р., 1986, Българските местоимения. София.
Ницолова Р., 2008, Българска граматика. Морфа огия, София.
Пашов, П., 1989, Практически бь ігарска граматика, София.
Речник БАН, 2000, Речник на бьлгарския език. Под ред. на Емилия Пернишка и др. БАН. Т. 10. С.
Стоянов Ст., 1980, Граматика на бьлгарския книжовен език, София.
Фау іър Р., 1493, Речник на съвременните литературни термини, София.
Чаралозова К., 1996, Някои наблюдения върху употреиата на показателното местоимение този/онзи при ситуационен деиксис, „ Български език”, №2), 44-48.
Черненко Л. О., 1490, Оценка в знаке и знак в оценке. — Науч. докл. высш. шк. Филол. науки. Москва, №2, 72-82.
Marcjanek M., 1999, Sposoby mówenia przez Polaków o osobach trzecich. „Przegląd Humanistyczny" nr o, XLI11, s. 137-153.
Wierzbicka, A., 1996, Semantics: Primes and Universals, N. Y. Oxford.
Authors
Mariâ IlievaStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Stylistyka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
