Čelovek i vremâ v istorii russkogo literaturnogo âzyka
Lûbov’ V. Balašova
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analyses of the conceptual metaphors “Time and Coor- dinate Space” in the literary Russian language history. The principles of forming the conceptual Time-models in the Old Russian language have been discovered. The two most productive models have been stated. In the first model, time is active and moves on the horizontal datum linę; man is static but it is exactly he who takes the central position, which has been perceived as the Present. The second model is also connected with the idea of horizontal moving. But in this model, the man becomes active and moves on the Time coordinate. One can see the increasing productiveness of these conceptual meta- phors in diachronic approach. The number of members of this metaphorical field incre- ases significantly as well as the system of the relationship between them becomes morę ti- ghtly knit. There is the following tendency of the relationship between man and time in diachronic approach from the conceptual point of view. In the Old Russian language time was mostly regarded as something objective and existing independently from a man. But in the contemporary Russian literary language the active influence of a man on the time is becoming possible. This category combines both objective and subjective ąualities. Thus, anthropocentrism of the relationship “Man and Time” becomes stronger.
Keywords:
conceptual model, metaphor, Russian literary language, diachronia, time, manReferences
Арутюнова Н.Д., 1998, Язык и мир человека, Москва.
Балашова Л.В., 1998, Метафора в диахронии, Саратов.
Бардина Н.В.,1996, Конфигуративно-энергиальные единицы речевого потока. — Семантика языковых единиц, Т.1, Москва.
Буслаев Ф.И., 1992, Преподавание отечественного языка, Москва.
Иванов Вяч.Вс., 1990, Реконструкция структуры символики и семантики индое-вропейского погребального обряда. - Исследования в области балто-славя-нской духовной культуры. Погребальный обряд, Москва.
КаралюнасС., 1986, К выражению противопоставления ‘раннее’— ‘позднее (время дня) '(соотв. ‘утро’- ‘вечер ’) в балтийских и некоторых других и.-е. языках. - Этимология 1984, Москва.
Колесов В.В., 1991, Слова литературного языка в диалектной речи (4. Образ). - Диалектная лексика 1987, Санкт-Петербург.
Лакофф Дж., 2004, Женщины, огонь и опасные вещи: Что категории языка говор¬ят нам о мышлении, Москва.
Лакофф Дж., Джонсон М., 2004, Метафоры, которыми мы живем, Москва.
Лихачев Д.С., 1979, Поэтика древнерусской литературы, Москва.
Лотман Ю.Н., 1992, Статьи по семиотике и типологии культуры, Таллинн.
Маковский М.М., 1989, Удивительный мир слов и значений, Москва.
Преображенский А.Г., 1958, Этимологический словарь русского языка, Москва.
Радутная О.А., 1996, Синкретизм и полисемия как категории формально-содер-жательной языковой асимметрии. — Семантика языковых единиц. Т. 1, Москва.
Соколов В.В., 1979, Средневековая философия, Москва.
Степанов Ю.С., 1997, Словарь русской культуры, Москва.
Телия В.Н., 1988, Предисловие. - Метафора в языке и тексте, Москва.
Топоров В.Н., 1983, Пространство и текст. — Текст: семиотика и структура, Москва.
Топоров В.Н., 1994, Судьба и случай. — Понятие судьбы в контексте разных культур, Москва.
Успенский Б.А., 1989, История и семиотика (восприятие времени как семиотическая проблема). Статья 2. — Труды по знаковым системам. Вып. XXIII, Тарту.
Фасмер М., 1986, Этимологический словарь русского языка, Т. I, Москва.
Фрейденберг О.М., 1997, Поэтика сюжета и жанра, Москва.
Якобсон Г., 1969, Цели и методы этимологизации слов, выражающих некоторые абстрактные понятия. — Этимология. 1967, Москва.
Яковлева Е.С, 1994; Фрагменты русской языковой картины мира (модели пространства, времени, восприятия), Москва.
Authors
Lûbov’ V. BalašovaStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Stylistyka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
