Sick Disaster Jokes as a Cultural Phenomenon

Dorota Brzozowska




Abstract

Artykuł dotyczy specyfiki występowania niesmacznych dowcipów katastroficznych w kulturach polskiej i amerykańskiej. Przedstawiono w nim charakterystykę polskich dowcipów o powodzi, polskich i amerykańskich tekstów powstałych po terrorystycznym ataku na World Trade Centre oraz polskich dowcipów odnoszących się do afery tzw. „łowców skór” w łódzkim pogotowiu. Analizie poddano poszczególne grupy tekstów, ich źródła i kontekst socjokulturowy. Badanie komparatystyczne prowadzi do wniosku o kulturowo zróżnicowanym charakterze skryptów występujących w wymienionych grupach dowcipów. Ten brak symetrii między polskimi i amerykańskimi dowcipami ma swoje źródło w odmiennej mentalności, tradycji i wyznawanych systemach wartości, które jednakże ulegają unifikacji pod wpływem globalizacji, zmieniającej polskie preferencje do przedstawianego typu dowcipów.


Download


Published
2002-12-31

Cited by

Brzozowska, D. (2002). Sick Disaster Jokes as a Cultural Phenomenon. Stylistyka, 11, 339–348. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3773

Authors

Dorota Brzozowska 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.


Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>