Rol' aksyologyečskogo aspekta v formirovanii novogo naučnogo znaniâ
Nataliâ V. Danilevskaâ
Abstract
The dynamics of developing a scientific text reflects the dynamics of a cognitive process. At the same time the changing of the knowledge available in the text from hypothetical to more valid is fulfilled according to the principle of its pithy and thematic accessibility for the broad continuum of special scientific information: proper new knowledge of a researcher becomes scientific only under conditions of its going into the system of available knowledge.
The text analysis shows that the old and knew knowledge conflict in scientific communication is not a conflict, but a dialectical unity. The interaction between already known and knew is fulfilled according to the principle of altemation of old and knew knowledge components. It is realized in two ways: I ) as an interaction between components of scientifically known and scientifically unknown (author's) knowledge - intertextual alternation. 2) as an interaction between the knowledge
known according to a certain communication, expressed in the left context and the components of new knowledge, unknown from a certain text and for the first time expressed in it - intratextual alternation. lt is important that inter- and intratextual altemation pierces through the whole text and thus is normative for a scientific style. Expressing of the scientifically new knowledge always takes place in "arrangement" of the old (scientific and communicational) knowledge and the "arrangement" is made by author. We can say that the expressing of new knowledge goes according to the principle: "the necessary maximum of old + the possible minimum of new.
Keywords:
former scientific knowledge, scientific discourse, the text dynamics, axiological aspect of the epistemological situation, the dynamics of cognitionReferences
Гусев С.С.,Тульчинский Г.Л., 1985, Проблема потшатш 8 философии, Москва.
Данилевская Н.В., 200 1, «Знание» как объект исследования u механизм выражения познавательной деятельности в научном дискурсе. Разновидности «знания». - Стереотипность и творчество в тексте, Пермь.
Ивин A.A., 2000, Теория аргументации, Москва.
Клике. Ф., 1983, Пробуждающееся мышление: Y истоков человеческого интешекта, Пер. с нем. / общ. ред. Величковекого Б.М.; Предисл. Ломова Б.Ф., Москва.
Кондаков Н.И., 1971, Логический словарь, Москва.
Кожина М.Н., 200 1, Стилистико-текстовый статус и взаішодействие категорий ретроспекции и проспекции в научной речи (интерди- сциминарный аспект) (в соавт. с 51.А. Чиговекой). - Стереотипность и творчество в тексте, Пермь.
Котюрова М.П., 1996, O некоторых особенностях смысловой структуры теоретического текста. - Очерки истории научного стаю русского литературного языка XVI11-XX вв, т. II, ч. I. Стилистика научного текста (общие парметры), гл. VIII, Пермь.
Котюрова М.П., 1988, Об экстрачингвистическш; основаниях смьісловоіі структуры научного текста, Красноярек.
Крьімекий С.Б., 1974, Научное знание и принципы его трансформации, Киев.
Крьімекий С.Б., 1989, Типы и принципы рациональности. - Йолан П.Ф., Крьім- екий С.Б., ГІарахонекий Б.А. Рациональность в науке и культуре, Киев.
Леонтьев А.Н., 1975, Деятельность, сознание, .чинность, Москва.
Лурия А.Р., 1975, Основные проблемы нейролингвистики, Москва.
Мамчур Е.А., Овчинников Н.Ф., Уемов А.И., 1989, Принцип простоты и меры сложности, Москва.
Матвеева Т.В., 1998, Стилистика текстовых категорий, “Stylistyka" t. VII, Opole.
Мусхелишвили Н.Л., Шрейдер Ю.А., 1989, Постижение versus понимание, Ученые запиеки Тартусского универеитета, вып. 855, Текст - культура - семиотика нарратива, “Труды по знаковым системам” XXIII, Тарту.
Навозов Б.Ф., 1969, Оценка, ее структура и роль в познании. - Проблемьі методологии и логики науки, вып. 5, Томек.
Ианкрац ІО.Г., 1992, Пропозиционшьная форма представления знаний. - Язык и структуры представленім знаний, Сб. Научно-аналитичееких обзоров, Москва.
Петров М.К., 1991, Язык, знак, культура, Москва.
Петров М.К., 1992, Социально-культурные основания развития современной науки, Москва.
Ракитов А.И., 1977, Философские проблемы науки, Москва.
Розов M.A., 1977, Проблемы эмпирического анализа научных знаний, Новосибирск.
Рябцева Н.К., 1992, Мысль как действие, или риторика рассуждения. - Логический аначиз языка, Москва.
Славин A.B., 1976, Проблема возникновения нового знания, Москва.
Смирнов A.A., 1966, Проблемы психологии nGMJ1mii, Москва.
Стичистический энциклопедический словарь русского языка, ред. M.H. Кожина, Москва, 2003.
Швырев В.С., 1984, Научное познание как деятельность, Москва.
Швырев В.С., 1988, Анализ научного познаны: основные направления, формы, проблемы, Москва.
Authors
Nataliâ V. DanilevskaâStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Stylistyka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
