O ponâtii "tekstovaâ norma" v kommunikativnoj stilistike teksta

Nina S. Bolotnova




Abstract

Communicative stylistics is a new field of modem functional stylistics and it is formed on the basis of other sciences, which study text as a fom1 of communication and phenomenon of idiostyle. In contrast to linguistics oftext and linguistic poetics communicative stylistics studies text in respect to author and addressee's activity. Unlike pragmatics, psycholinguistics, psychopoetics, which are guided by the theory of speech activities, communicative stylistics concems linguistic-stylistic aspects of intercourse speech in their textual realization. And at the same time a research of structural and semantic text organization in the view of communicative effect is considered as analysis caused by some factors such as stylistic usage and author's idiostyle. Activities approach in the context of
communicative stylistics is connected with its examination as a fact ofinitial communicative author's activity and an object of secondary communicative reader's activity. The aim of communicative stylistics is to work up the problems of efficacy of author and addressee's textual activity taking into account specific character of language person, field of intercourse, aim and tasks, genre and style peculiarities of text. In accord with anthropocentric approach to text idiostyle is considered as a dominant notion and it gets another communicative sense. This notion contains multifold demonstration of author's language person in the structure, semantics and pragmatics of text. The ąuestions of normalization in text activity are considered as the main problem of communicative stylistics. A new aspect of this problem is that it is connected with efficacy intercourse of author and reader. Taking into consideration bilateral character of communication (initial and secondary communicative activity which is connected with text formation and text perception and interpretation) textual norm is regarded as an important factor for dialogic intercourse of author and addressee, which shows a standard of textual activ ity for a certain sphere of communication. Textual nom1 is defined as follows: 1 ) it is firm rules of textual activity which are prevalent historically and accepted by a society; standard texts for a certain sphere of communication are fom1ed on the bas is of these rules; 2) it is a system of communicative- pragmatic, genre and style, composition and speech norms, which is proper for a certain type of text and it shows its communicative essence, linguistic character and extralinguistic orientation; 3) it is a harmonious organization of all structural elements of text in accord with the basie idea of author and direction of attention toward addressee.
This notion of textual norm takes into account a complex of the following factors: 1) place of text in the structure of universal model of speech communication by Roman O. Jakobson; 2) levels of model of language person which is out of text according to the theory of Yurij N. Karaulov; 3) communicative characteristics of speech which text must meet the requirements; 4) the main features and characteristics of text. ln spite of their stability textual nom1s are historically changed and varied depending on the type oftext (mainly it depends on its genre and style peculiarities, sphere of communication, literary school which author follows) and author's intention and addressee's factor.

Keywords:

communicative stylistics, textual norm, efficacious communication

Бепьчнков 1О.А., 1997, Стиль -Русский язык: Знцимопедия, Москва.

Бопотнова Н.С., 1992, Хуdожественный текст 6 коммуникативном аспекте и ком/ыексный ониз еОини пексическ020 уробня, Томск.

Бопотнова Н.С., 1992, Коммуникативные универсалии и их лексическое 60/поиуение 6 ху0ожест6енном тексте, «Фнлологнческне наукн», М24, Москва.

Бопотнова Н.С., 1996, Краткая исторг стилистики ху0ожест6енной речи 6 России (к истокам ко^уникотибнои стилистики текста), Томск.

Бопотнова Н.С., 1997, Коммуникативна стилистика текста и ее особенности - Материмы меж0унаро0но2о сое^0а русистов 6 Красноярске ( 1-4 октября 1997), т.1, Красноярск.

Бопотнова Н.С., 1998, О статусе коммуникативной стшистики текста и перспективах ее развития, «Известня Апта^кко^о ун-та», №3 (8), Еарнауп.

Еопотнова Н.С., Еабенко М.И., Васнльева А.А..., 2001, Ко^уникативноя стилистика ху0ожест6енно2о текста: пексическм структура и идиостшы, Томск.

Болотнова Н.С., 2003, Коммуникативная стилистика худо:>1сественно2о текста. - Стилистический знциклопедический словарь русского языка I Под ред. М.Н. Кожиной, Москва.

Венгранович М.А., 2004, Традиционность как базовая стилевая черта фольклорно2о текста. - Стереотипность и тборчестбо 6 тексте: Межвуз. сб. научн. трудов I Отв. ред. М. П. Котюрова, Пермь.

Винокур Г.О., 1959, Избранные работы по русскому языку, Москва.

Винокур Т.Г., 1993, Товорящий и слушающий. Варианты речебоbо поведения, Москва.

Караулов Ю.Н., 1987, Русским язык и языковая личность, Москва.


Кожина М. Н., 1977, Стилистика русского языка, Москва.

Кожина М. Н., 1983, Стилистика русского языка, 2-е изд., Москва.

Кожина М. Н., 1993, Стиистика русско2о языка, 3-е изд., Москва.

Кокина М.Н., 2002, Речебедение и фунм/иональная стилистика: вопросы теории. Избранные труОы, Пермь.

Манаков Н.А., Москальчук Г.Г., 2004, К вопросу о синтезе материальных и идеальных характеристик текста. - Художественный текст: варианты интерпретации: Материапы IX межвузовской науч.-практ. конф. (20-21 мш 2004 2.). Вып. 9, Бийск.

Матвеева Т.В., 2003, Норма. - Учебный спобарь: русский язык, культура речи, стилистика, риторика, Москва.

Москальчук Г.Г., 1998, Структурная ор2аниза^/^/я и самоор2аниза^/ия текста, Барнаул.

Очерки истории нау'Iного сти.111 русско2о литературного языка XVШ-XX 66., т. I: Разбитие научного стиля б аспекте функ^/ионирования языковых единиц различных уровней, ч. I; ч. II: Стилистика научшхо текста (общие параметры), ч. 1, ч. 2, под ред. проф. М.Н. Кокиной, 1994-1998, Пермь.

Текст: стереотип и творчество: Межвуз. сб. нау'Iн. трудов, отв. ред. М.П. Котюрова, 1998, Пермь.

Тюкова 11.Н., 2004, Коммуникативные универсалии и их лексическое воплощение в лирике Е.Н. Пастернака (на материале книги «Сестра моя - жизнь»): Автореф . дис . ... канд. филол. наук, Томск.

Сидоров Е.В., 1987, Проблемы речевой системности, Москва.

Стереотипность и творчество в тексте: Межвуз. сб. научн. Трудов, отв. ред. М.П. Котюрова,1999, Пермь.

Стереотипность и творчество в тексте: Межвуз. сб. научн трудов, отв. ред. М.П. Котюрова, 2002, Пермь.

Стереотипность и творчество в тексте: Межвуз. сб. 1-1ау'Iн. Трудов, отв. ред. М.П. Котюрова, 2003, Пермь.

Стояновнч А., 2004, К общим 1акономерностям диффузии стилей - Стереотипность и творчество в тексте: Межвуз. сб. научн. трудов, отв. ред. М.Т1. Котюрова, Пермь.


Пищапьннкова В.А., I 992, Проблема смысла хуОожественного текста: Психолингвистический аспект, Новосибирск.

Черемнсина Н.В., 1983, О гармонии композиции хуОожественного целого (трагеОш Пушкина «Моцарт и Сапьери»). - Язык и композицм хуОожественного текста, Москва.

Черемнснна Н.В., 1984, О гармонии композиции хуОожественного текста (Роман Пушкина «Евгений Онегин»). - Язык и композиция хуОо- жест8енного текста, Москва.

Черемнснна Н.В., 1986, Период: структура, гармония, поОтекст. - Язык и компози^/^IЯ хуОожественного текста, Москва.

Штанн К.3., 1993, Принципы ^н^шз^ поэтического текста, Санкт-Петербург - Ставропопь.

Штанн К.3., 1996, Поэтический текст в научном контексте, Санкт-Петербург -Ставропопь.

Штанн К.3., 2004, Культурное Оостояние России: Пермская научна иикола функционалы стилистики. - Стереотипность и творчество в тексте: Межбуз. сб. научн. труОов, отв. ред. М. П. Котюрова, Пермь.

Якобсон Р., I 975, Лингвистика и поэтика. - Структурализм: «за>> и «против», Москва.

Published
2021-05-28

Cited by

Bolotnova, N. S. . (2021). O ponâtii "tekstovaâ norma" v kommunikativnoj stilistike teksta. Stylistyka, 14, 87–102. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/4052

Authors

Nina S. Bolotnova 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2005 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.


Most read articles by the same author(s)