Published: 2019-11-03

Co lub kogo falsyfikuje Popper? Problem ścisłej wiedzy politologicznej

Łukasz Młyńczyk
Studia Krytyczne/Critical Studies
Section: Varia
DOI https://doi.org/10.25167/sk.1430

Abstract

The cognitive value of contemporary political science is the result of a consensus which largely ignores the methodological dispute between naturalism and antinaturalism, assuming that the scientific of political knowledge is less important than its postulated usefulness. The text attempts to indicate the epistemological perspective, which is a response to the formal removal of knowledge about social facts from the resources of science theory by Karl R. Popper. It is therefore a question of how the synthesis of social knowledge and natural sciences can be removed from politics by the invective pseudo-science, to which its contemporary luminaries have contributed significantly, limiting knowledge to the quantification of typical social-science behaviours, and recognizing this as undeniable on the basis of methodology.

Keywords:

naturalism, antinaturalism, critical rationalism, evolution, natural selection, political, theory

Download files

Citation rules

Młyńczyk, Łukasz. (2019). Co lub kogo falsyfikuje Popper? Problem ścisłej wiedzy politologicznej. Studia Krytyczne/Critical Studies, (4), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.25167/sk.1430

Cited by / Share


This website uses cookies for proper operation, in order to use the portal fully you must accept cookies.