Ankieta internetowa jako element mixed-mode survey design: zastosowania, wyzwania perspektywy

Adam Rybak

doi:10.25167/sk.1431

Published: 2019-11-03

No. 4 (2017)

Ankieta internetowa jako element mixed-mode survey design: zastosowania, wyzwania perspektywy

Adam Rybak

Studia Krytyczne/Critical Studies

Section: Varia

https://doi.org/10.25167/sk.1431

Abstract

The aim of the article is to present the current knowledge on the possibilities and the advisability of the use of online survey mode in conducting surveys in the mixed-mode design. Due to the increasing difficulty in the realization of survey research in the traditional way, it is necessary to search for new solutions. The article presents the main difficulties associated with the use of Web mode, and ways of minimizing them in some areas, mainly by mixing modes in all stages of research. The solutions are based on experiments results published in international methodological literature. Eventually it indicates areas where the current knowledge is inadequate and it is necessary to carry out further experimental research.

Keywords:

web survey, online questionnaire, mixed-mode survey design

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Rybak, A. (2019). Ankieta internetowa jako element mixed-mode survey design: zastosowania, wyzwania perspektywy. Studia Krytyczne/Critical Studies, (4), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.25167/sk.1431

Cited by / Share

References

Argaez, Enrique De. 2017. „Internet World Stats”. Pobrano 22 wrzesień 2017 (www.internetworldstats.com).
Google Scholar

Baruch, Yehuda i Brooks C. Holtom. 2008. „Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research”. Human Relations 61(8):1139–60.
Google Scholar

Bergstrom, Betty. 1992. Ability measure equivalence of computer adaptive and paper and pencil tests: A research synthesis. San Francisco.
Google Scholar

Buskirk, Trent D. i Charles H. Andrus. 2014. „Making Mobile Browser Surveys Smarter”. Field Methods 26(4):322–42.
Google Scholar

Cole, Michael S., Arthur G. Bedeian, i Hubert S. Feild. 2006. „The Measurement Equivalence of Web-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Measures of Transformational Leadership”. Organizational Research Methods 9(3):339–68.
Google Scholar

Couper, Mick. 2013. „Is the sky falling? New technology, changing media, and the future of surveys”. Survey Research Methods 7(3):145–56.
Google Scholar

Couper, Mick P. 2011. „The future of modes of data collection”. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(5 SPEC. ISSUE):889–908.
Google Scholar

Couper, Mick P. i Peter V. Miller. 2008. „Web survey methods: Introduction”. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(5):831–35.
Google Scholar

Couper, Mick P. i Gregg J. Peterson. 2017. „Why Do Web Surveys Take Longer on Smartphones?” Social Science Computer Review 35(3):357–77.
Google Scholar

Dillman, Don A., Jolene D. Smyth, i Leah Melani Christian. 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Google Scholar

Edwards, Michelle L., Don A. Dillman, i Jolene D. Smyth. 2014. „An experimental test of the effects of survey sponsorship on internet and mail survey response”. Public Opinion Quarterly 78(3):734–50.
Google Scholar

Groves, Robert. 2006. „Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys: What Do We Know about the Linkage between Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias?” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5):646–75.
Google Scholar

Groves, Robert M. 2011. „Three eras of survey research”. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(5 SPEC. ISSUE):861–71.
Google Scholar

Gwaltney, Chad J., Alan L. Shields, i Saul Shiffman. 2008. „Equivalence of Electronic and Paper-and-Pencil Administration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Meta-Analytic Review”. Value in Health 11(2):322–33.
Google Scholar

Jabkowski, Piotr. 2015. Reprezentatywność badań reprezentatywnych?: analiza wybranych problemów metodologicznych oraz praktycznych w paradygmacie całkowitego błędu pomiaru. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Google Scholar

de Leeuw, Edith D. 1992. Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face surveys. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.
Google Scholar

de Leeuw, Edith D. 2008. „Choosing the Method of Data Collection”. Ss. 113–35 w International Handbook of Survey Methodology, zredagowane przez E. D. de Leeuw, J. J. Hox, i D. A. Dillman. New York: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar

de Leeuw, Edith D. i Joop. J. Hox. 2011. „Internet surveys as part of a mixed-mode design”. Ss. 45–76 w Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet. London: Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar

Mead, Alan D. i Fritz Drasgow. 1993. „Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 114(3):449–58.
Google Scholar

Meade, A. W., L. C. Michels, i G. J. Lautenschlager. 2007. „Are Internet and paper-andpencil personality tests truly comparable? An experimental design measurement invariance study”. Organizational Research Methods 10(2):322–45.
Google Scholar

Medway, Rebecca L. i Jenna Fulton. 2012. „When more gets you less: A meta-analysis of the effect of concurrent web options on mail survey response rates”. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(4):733–46.
Google Scholar

Millar, Morgan M. i Don A. Dillman. 2011. „Improving response to web and mixed-mode surveys”. Public Opinion Quarterly 75(2):249–69.
Google Scholar

Ministerstwo Cyfryzacji. 2017. „Udostępnianie danych z rejestru PESEL”. Pobrano 18 styczeń 2018 (https://www.gov.pl/cyfryzacja/udostepnianie-danych-z-rejestru-pesel1).
Google Scholar

Neyman, Jerzy. 1934. „On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method?: The Method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection Author(s): Jerzy Neyman Source?: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , Vol . 97 , No . 4 (1934), pp . 558-625 Pub”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 97(4):558–625.
Google Scholar

Olson, Kristen, Jolene D. Smyth, i Heather M. Wood. 2012. „Does giving people their preferred survey mode actually increase survey participation rates? an experimental examination”. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(4):611–35.
Google Scholar

Porter, Stephen R. i Michael E. Whitcomb. 2007. „Mixed-mode contacts in web surveys”. Public Opinion Quarterly 71(4):635–48.
Google Scholar

Preckel, Franzis i Helge Thiemann. 2003. „Online- versus paper-pencil-version of a high potential intelligence test”. Swiss Journal of Psychology 62(2):131–38.
Google Scholar

Sakshaug, Joseph W., Ting Yan, i Roger Tourangeau. 2010. „Nonresponse error, measurement error, and mode of data collection: Tradeoffs in a multi-mode survey of sensitive and non-sensitive items”. Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5):907–33.
Google Scholar

Shudong Wang, Hong Jiao, M. J. Young, T. Brooks, i J. Olson. 2007. „A Meta-Analysis of Testing Mode Effects in Grade K-12 Mathematics Tests”. Educational and Psychological Measurement 67(2):219–38.
Google Scholar

Smyth, Jolene D. i Jennie E. Pearson. 2011. „Internet Survey Methods: A Review of Strengths, Weaknesses, and Innovations”. Ss. 11–44 w Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet, zredagowane przez M. Das, P. Ester, i L. Kaczmirek. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Stoop, Ineke, Jaak Billiet, Achim Koch, i Rory Fitzgerald. 2010. Improving Survey Response: Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Google Scholar

Sztabiński, Franciszek i Teresa Żmijewska-Jędrzejczyk. 2012. „Mixed Mode Survey Design: problem efektu techniki”. Przegląd Socjologiczny 61(1):31–63.
Google Scholar

Sztabiński, Paweł B. i Franciszek Sztabiński. 2016. „Does Mixed Mode Data Collection Improve the Achieved Sample? A Comparison of the ESS PAPI Survey and a Mixed Mode Experiment”. Pobrano 22 wrzesień 2017 (www.ifispan.pl/wp-content/uploads/ 2016/03/PBS_FS_Sztabinski_ESS7_dissconf.pdf).
Google Scholar

Vannieuwenhuyze, J. T. A. i Melanie Revilla. 2013. „Evaluating Relative Mode Effects on Data Quality in Mixed-Mode Surveys”. Survey Research Methods 7(3):157–68.
Google Scholar

Vehovar, Vasja, Katja Lozar Manfreda, i Gašper Koren. 2008. „Internet Surveys”. Ss. 271–83 w The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research, zredagowane przez W. Donsbach i M. Traugott. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Google Scholar

Wells, Tom, Justin T. Bailey, i Michael W. Link. 2014. „Comparison of Smartphone and Online Computer Survey Administration”. Social Science Computer Review 32(2): 238–55.
Google Scholar

Zając, Jan M. i Dominik Batorski. 2007. „Jak skłonić do udziału w badaniach internetowych: zwiększanie realizacji próby”. Psychologia Społeczna 2 3–4(5):234–247.
Google Scholar