Społeczeństwo strachu a warunki dialogu

Franciszek Kampka

doi:10.25167/so.5632

The society of fear and the conditions for dialogue

Franciszek Kampka

Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4564-514X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/so.5632

Abstract

The article discusses the new social conditions of interreligious dialogue. Adopting a sociological perspective and referring to the concept of the risk society and the politics of fear showed that religious diversity today is sometimes treated as a potential threat. This was followed by a discussion of the new social context in which religion operates today. Different ways of understanding and practising dialogue between adherents of different religions and the possible outcomes of such dialogue were also presented, with a particular focus on the perspective of European countries.

Keywords:

interreligious dialogue, intercultural dialogu, society of fear, society of risk

References

Altheide David L. 2006. “Terrorism and the Politics of Fear”, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 6 (4): 415-439.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605285733 Google Scholar

Arthur James. 2011. “Intercultural versus Interreligious. Dialogue in a Pluralist Europe”, Policy Futures in Education, 9(1): 74-80.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.1.74 Google Scholar

Bauman Zygmunt. 2008. Płynny lęk, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Google Scholar

Beck Ulrich. 2002. Społeczeństwo ryzyka: w drodze do innej nowoczesności, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Google Scholar

Besley Tina, Michael A. Peters. 2011. “Interculturalism, Ethnocentrism and Dialogue”, Policy Futures in Education, 9(1): 1-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.1.1 Google Scholar

Bokern Friedrich. 2009. “Interreligious peacebuilding: a new engagement of religious actors in European politics?”, European View, 8:107–115.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-009-0083-9 Google Scholar

Castells Manuel. 2008. Siła tożsamości, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Cheruvallil-Contractor Sariya. 2023. “Muslims and Dialogue: The Value of Inter-Convictional Approaches in ‘Coming to Common Terms’”, Journal of Dialogue Studies, 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55207/VJLA8047 Google Scholar

Dornhof Sarah, 2012. “Rationalities of dialogue”, Current Sociology, 60(3): 382–398.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111426190 Google Scholar

Emmerich Arndt-Walter. 2022. “Negotiating Germany’s first Muslim–Christian kindergarten: Temporalities, multiplicities, and processes in interreligious dialogue”, Social Compass, 69(4): 578–595.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686221084694 Google Scholar

Fuist Todd Nicholas, Thomas J. Josephsohn. 2013. “Lines that matter, lines that don’t: Religion, boundaries, and the meaning of difference”, Critical Research on Religion, 1(2): 195–213.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303213490042 Google Scholar

Furredi Frank. 2018. How Fear Works: Culture of Fear in the Twenty-First Century, London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar

Giddens Anthony. 2008. Konsekwencje nowoczesności, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Google Scholar

Jaskóła Piotr. 2016. Die christliche Grundwerte am Ende des XX Jahrhunderts, w: tenże, Ku jedności w Chrystusie. Wybrane zagadnienia z problematyki ekumenicznej i dogmatycznej, Opole: Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego Uniwersytetu, 473-480.
Google Scholar

Khan Issa, Mohammad Elius, Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor, Mohd Yakub zulkifli Bin Mohd yusoff, Kamaruzaman Noordin, Fadillah Mansor. 2020. “A Critical Appraisal of Interreligious Dialogue in Islam”, SAGE Open, October-December: 1–10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020970560 Google Scholar

Koch Kurt. 1992. Christ sein in einem neuen Europa. Provokation und Perspektiven, Freiburg (Schweiz): Paulusverlag.
Google Scholar

Lupton Deborah. 2013, Risk, New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Martini Carlo M. Kardinal, Georg Sporschill, Jerusalemer Nachtgespräche. 2008. Über das Risiko des Glaubens, Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder.
Google Scholar

Martini Carlo Maria. 1991. Perspektiven für Kirche und Welt. Ein Gespräch mit dem Mailänder Kardinal, München – Zürich – Wien: Verlag Neue Stadt.
Google Scholar

Murat Haner, Melissa M. Sloan , Francis T. Cullen, Teresa C. Kulig, Cheryl Lero Jonson. 2019. “Public Concern about Terrorism: Fear, Worry, and Support for Anti-Muslim Policies”, Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5: 1–16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119856825 Google Scholar

Parker Gumucio Cristián. 2008. “Interculturality, Conflicts and Religion: Theoretical Perspectives”, Social Compass, 55(3): 316–329.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768608093694 Google Scholar

Possamai Adam, Murray Lee. 2011. “Hyper-real religions Fear, anxiety and late-modern religious innovation”, Journal of Sociology, 47(3): 227–242.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311408967 Google Scholar

Rodell Jeremy. 2023. “Humanists and Dialogue: Why the Non-religious must be Included”, Journal of Dialogue , 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55207/JNLO6797 Google Scholar

Sik Domonkos. 2020. “Towards a social theory of fear: A phenomenology of negative integration”, European Journal of Social Theory, 23(4): 512–531.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431019850074 Google Scholar

Supp-Montgomerie Jenna. 2021. When the Medium Was the Mission. The Atlantic Telegraph and the Religious Origins of Network Culture, New York: NYU Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479801527.001.0001 Google Scholar

Taylor Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Taylor Michael. 2023. “Christians and Dialogue: An Opinion Piece”, Journal of Dialogue Studies, 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55207/YZFL3867 Google Scholar

Wieviorka Michel. 2015. Wielokulturowość: różnice w różnicach, w: Współczesne teorie socjologiczne, red. Irena Borowik, Janusz Mucha, t. 2, s. 423-455, Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy „NOMOS”.
Google Scholar

Download