Godfrey Goodman and George Hakewill on the decay of the world

Adam Drozdek

doi:10.25167/so.5293

Godfrey Goodman and George Hakewill on the decay of the world

Adam Drozdek

Duquesne University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25167/so.5293

Аннотация

The end of the sixteenth and the beginning of the seventeenth century was marked by theological discussions concerning the decay of the world. Godfrey Goodman in The fall of man presented an extensive argument in favor if inherent corruptibility of the world that gradually heads to its destruction and George Hakewill countered with a book-long rebuttal of this view. The views of these two clergymen are presented in this article both of whom trying to enhance by common opinion that the world was created to express the glory of God.

Ключевые слова:

Godfrey Goodman, George Hakewill, the corruptibility of the world

Библиографические ссылки

[Godfrey Goodman]. 1616. The fall of man, or the corruption of nature, proved by the light of our naturall reason. Which being the first ground and occasion of our Christian faith and religion, may likewise serve for the first step and degree of the naturall mans conversion. London: Felix Kyngston and are to be sold by Richard Lee.
Google Scholar

Estreicher Karol. 1900. Bibliografia polska. Vol. 18. Kraków: Drukarnia Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Google Scholar

Foster Jones Richard. 1936. Ancients and moderns. St. Louis: Washington University.
Google Scholar

G[oodman of] G[louster] G[odfrey]. 1653. The two great mysteries of Christian religion, the ineffable Trinity, wonderfull Incarnation, explicated, to the satisfaction of mans own naturall reason, and according to the grounds of philosophy. London: J. Flesher.
Google Scholar

G[oodman]G[odfrey]. 1622. The creatures praysing God: or, The religion of dumbe creatures. An example and argument for the stirring up of our devotion, and for the confusion of atheism. London: Felik [!] Kingston.
Google Scholar

Hakewill George. 1627. An apologie of the power and providence of God in the government of the world. Oxford: William Turner.
Google Scholar

Harris Victor. 1966. All coherence gone: a study of the seventeenth century controversy over disorder and decay in the universe. London: Frank Cass.
Google Scholar

Hepburn Ronald W. 1955. “George Hakewill: the virility of nature”. Journal of the History of Ideas 16: 135–150.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2707659 Google Scholar

Ingle Soden Geoffrey. 1953. Godfrey Goodman, Bishop of Gloucester, 1583–1656. London: S.P.C.K.
Google Scholar

Leslie Stephen, Lee Sidney. Eds. 1890. Dictionary of national biography. Vol. 24. New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Matuszewski Adam. 2011. “Popularyzacja nauki europejskiej w twórczości Jana Jonstona”. Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki 56 (3–4): 57–75.
Google Scholar

Myślicki Ignacy. 1921. Jonston et de Spinoza, Dissertatio ex Chronici Spinozani Tomo Primo. Separatim edita. Hagae Comitis.
Google Scholar

Myślicki Ignacy. 1922. Jonston i de Spinoza. Varsoviae: Universitatis Liberae Polonae.
Google Scholar

Pietrzak Zbigniew. 2022. “Znaczenie idei «niszczenia się świata» w kształtowaniu filozofii przyrody Jana Jonstona w dziele O stałości natury.” Ruch Filozoficzny 78 (2): 275–297.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2022.015 Google Scholar

Szpilczyński Stanisław. 1976. “Jan Jonston z Szamotuł. Tytaniczny trud barokowego erudyty w świetle wielkiej dydaktyki.” Śląski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka 2: 223–229.
Google Scholar

Download