Polish view of the Contemporary Orthodox Church Law – problems on the way to systematization
Marek Ławreszuk
University of Białystok, Department of Orthodox Theology, Polandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8051-8106
Piotr Makal
The Association of the Orthodox Brotherhood of Sts. Cyril and Methodius, Polandhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-5076
Abstrakt
Orthodox church law is comprised of elements that regulate the life of the Church at various levels. The theological decisions, oroses, canons and canonical letters, which concern the Church globally, obviously focus on doctrine. Still, they also characterize the theological aspects of ecclesiology, primarily expressed in the Orthodox Church’s fundamental confession of faith – the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed. Although a number of the canons of the ecumenical councils and of the Holy Fathers, historical and contemporary resolutions passed by various local Orthodox Churches and other ecclesiastical authorities and institutions pertain to the universal sphere in many aspects, the vast majority of them set specific organizational standards of church life in the local perspective: the local Church, basic administrative units (dioceses, metropolises or exarchates), but above all in basic organizational structures, which include parishes and monasteries.
This article presents the problems experienced when systematising contemporary Orthodox church law.
This research aims to present a model for systematizing church law and to direct further research towards a comprehensive systemization of church law, including both the universal code and the legislation of specific Orthodox autocephalous churches.
The methodology of this work is based on analysing legal acts and analyses already conducted by authoritative canonists.
While focusing on the legal code of the autocephalous churches, the following questions were addressed: discrepancies resulting from the source corpuses adopted in various local churches and the lack or omission of information on significant organizational and systemic issues. The difficulties presented in this article provoke further research into organizing Orthodox church law. The fundamental problem is the absence of a standardized legal code for the universal Orthodox Church and a standardized compilation of ecclesiastical laws to be applied in autocephalous churches. The provisions of universal church law do not sufficiently organize issues of mutual intra-church relations, and in particular, the obligations and boundaries of the prerogatives of local autocephalous church structures.
This process of systematization should include updating legal provisions by means of recognizing provisions that have been canonically repealed by later canons of the same rank or higher as invalid.
##semicolon##
Orthodox church law##common.commaListSeparator## contemporary canonical issues##common.commaListSeparator## Orthodoxy##common.commaListSeparator## canon law##submission.citations##
Agapius a Hieromonk & Nicodemus a Monk (ed.). 1957. The Rudder. D. Cummings (transl.). Chicago: The Orthodox Christian Educational Society.
Google Scholar
Baron Arkadiusz & Pietras Henryk (ed.). 2006. Dokumenty synodów od 50 do 381 roku. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM (Synody i Kolekcje Praw).
Google Scholar
Beneševič Vladimir. 1914. Sbornik pamâtnikov po istorii cerkovnogo prava, preimuŝestvenno russkoj cerkvi do èpohi Petra Velikogo. Petrograd.
Google Scholar
Betlejko Jerzy. 2017. „Święty i Wielki Sobór Cerkwi Prawosławnej”. Studia i Dokumenty Ekumeniczne [Ecumenical Studies and Documents] 33(1) : 50-73.
Google Scholar
Blaza Marek. 2020. „Synodalność (soborowość) w Kościołach wschodnich”. Studia Bobolanum 31 : 87–111. doi: 10.30439/2020.2.5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30439/2020.2.5
Google Scholar
Borkowski Andrzej. 2019. „Ekumenizm a realizacja misyjnego posłannictwa Kościoła w kontekście dokumentów Wszechprawosławnego Synodu na Krecie”. Elpis 21 : 93–97. doi: 10.15290/elpis.2019.21.12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/elpis.2019.21.12
Google Scholar
Dragas Alexander. „The Autocephaly of the OCA – History, Arguments, and Aftermath”. Greek Orthodox Theological Review 61 : 167-209.
Google Scholar
Dragas Alexander. „The Constantinople and Moscow Divide: Troitsky and Photiades on the Extra-Jurisdictional Rights of the Ecumenical Patriarchate”. Theologia 88 : 135-190.
Google Scholar
J̌ovanović J̌evtimiǰe. 1844. Načatki cerkovnago prava drevnija pravoslavnija Crkve, s latinskim i srpsko-slovenskim tekstom. Novi Sad. (28.11.2021) http://digital.bms.rs/ebiblioteka/publications/view/5230.
Google Scholar
Kormčaâ napečatana sʺ originala patriarha Iosifa. 1912. Moskva: Žurnal «Cerkovʹ».
Google Scholar
Ławreszuk Marek. 2009. „Prawosławie wobec problemu etnofiletyzmu”. Elpis 19–20 : 73–102.
Google Scholar
Łotocki Aleksander. 1932. Zasady autokefalii. Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Nikodim episkop Dalmatinskij. 1897. Pravoslavnoe cerkovnoe pravo. Sankt-Peterburg.
Google Scholar
Pavlov Aleksij. 1902. Kurs cerkovnogo prava. Svâto-Troickaâ Sergieva Lavra.
Google Scholar
Przekop Edmund. 1977. „Problem wspólnego kodeksu prawa kanonicznego dla Kościołów prawosławnych”. Studia Płockie 5 : 173–183.
Google Scholar
Rallis Georhios & Potlis Michael. n.d. Sýntagma tôn theíon kaì iherôn kanónon. 6 vols. Athens.
Google Scholar
Troitsky Sergei. 1947. „O granitchach raspostradenija prava vlasti Konstantinopolskoj Patriarchii na ‘diaspora’”. Zhurnal Moskovskoj Patriarhii 11 : 34-45.
Google Scholar
Znosko Aleksy. 1973. Prawosławne prawo kościelne. Część I. Warszawa: Chrześcijańska Akademia Teologiczna.
Google Scholar
Zyzykin Michał. 1931. Autokefalia i zasady jej zastosowania. Warszawa.
Google Scholar
##libcom.authors##
Marek Ławreszukhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8051-8106
ks. dr hab. Marek Ławreszuk, prof. UwB
Kierownik Katedry Teologii Prawosławnej Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku. Dr hab. nauk teologicznych, dr nauk teologicznych w zakresie nauk teologicznych. Prawosławny duchowny i teolog. W latach 2005-2014 nauczyciel religii prawosławnej w białostockich szkołach. W latach 2009-2013 wykładowca liturgiki w Prawosławnym Seminarium Duchownym w Warszawie. Od 2012 roku p.o. Kierownika Katedry Teologii Prawosławnej UwB. Redaktor naczelny czasopisma naukowego “Elpis”.
##libcom.statistics##
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-sa4.footer##Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Studia Oecumenica
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0
Licencja oraz prawa autorskie autorzy przekazują wydawcy, którym jest Redakcji Wydawnictw WT UO.
Najaktuálnejšie články rovnakého autora (rovnakých autorov)
- Marek Ławreszuk, Pogrzeb nieochrzczonych dzieci w praktyce liturgicznej Cerkwi prawosławnej , Studia Oecumenica: Diel 19 (2019)
- Marek Ławreszuk, Wychowanie do postawy dialogu w katechezie Kościoła prawosławnego , Studia Oecumenica: Diel 16 (2016)
- Marek Ławreszuk, INVOCATION OF HOLY SPIRIT IN ANAPHORA OF SAINT JOHN CHRYSOSTOM AND SAINT BASIL THE GREAT , Studia Oecumenica: Diel 14 (2014)
