An Analysis and Criticism of Mind Transfer
Abstract
In this article, I examine a futuristic but not unimaginable optional opportunity of immortality – mind transfer – which has a strong connection with neuroscience, computer science, cognitive research, artificial intelligence and finally philosophy. I analyse this promising procedure from different points of view, such as regarding the potential difficulties of human transformation and the confusing issue of consciousness. The methodologies of mapping and scanning the human brain demonstrate contemporary technologies’ capabilities, but their limitations are apparent, too. I find that using mind transfer to ensure
or give humans the opportunity to extend their lifespan is not possible with the current level of knowledge and technology. I prove this through an analysis of a thought experiment and examine the differences between the person and the uploaded copy of it, making clear why mind transfer seems to be an impossible challenge right now. Although the use of AI provides great opportunities to support and improve humanity, we can conclude that its usage within present methodologies and technologies is neither sufficient to achieve eternal life nor remove the limitations of time. With the mind transfer procedure, we can preserve information only about humanity and not the essence that makes it unique.
Schlagworte:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence mind transfer, consciousness, human transformation, paradigm shift, ethicsLiteraturhinweise
Baillet Sylvain, Mosher John C., Leahy Richard M. 2001. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Explore, 18 (6) : 14–30. Online available: https://doi.org/10.1109/79.962275 (20.10.2021).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/79.962275
Google Scholar
Block Ned. 2008. Consciousness and cognitive access. In Phenomenal and access consciousness. Ed. Ned Block, Cynthia MacDonald, 289–317. Oxford: University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2008.00247.x
Google Scholar
Britannica. (n.d.a). Morphogenesis. https://www.britannica.com/science/morphogenesis (20.10.2022). Britannica. (n.d.b). Organogenesis. 2021, https://www.britannica.com/science/organogenesis (20.10.2022).
Google Scholar
Crane Tim, Patterson Sarah (ed.). 2000. History of the mind-body problem. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Graziano Michael S.A. 2019. What happens if your mind lives for ever on the internet?. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/oct/20/mind-uploading-brain-live-for-ever-internet-virtual-
Google Scholar
reality (20.10.2022).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2022.20.2.NQ22019
Google Scholar
Human Brain Project. Understanding cognition. 2021. https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/en/understanding-cognition/ (20.10.2022).
Google Scholar
Human Connectome Project. http://www.humanconnectomeproject.org/ (20.10.2022).
Google Scholar
Kampis György. 2000. Test és elme. In Filozófia az ezredfordulón. Ed. Kristóf Nyíri, 163–178. Budapest:Áron Kiadó.
Google Scholar
Kurzweil Ray. 1999. The age of spiritual machines. Viking.
Google Scholar
Kurzweil Ray. 2005. The singularity is near. Viking.
Google Scholar
Powell Kendall. 2018. How biologists are creating life-like cells from scratch. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07289-x (20.10.2022).
Google Scholar
Quinn Tristan. 2016. The immortalist: Uploading the mind to a computer. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35786771 (20.10.2022).
Google Scholar
Authors
Beáta Lakihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-8483
PhD in philosophy, senior lecturer at the Department of Behavioral Sciences of the University of Pécs, Hungary
Statistics
Downloads
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2024 Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International.
Licencja oraz prawa autorskie autorzy przekazują wydawcy, którym jest Redakcji Wydawnictw WT UO.
Am häufigsten gelesenen Artikel dieser/dieses Autor/in
- Beáta Laki, Avoidance Versus Elimination. How Can We Harm Less? How Can We Do Rather Good? , Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego: Bd. 43 Nr. 2 (2023)
