Comparative Researching Cultures Through a Communicative Ideal

Vadim V. Dementʹev



Natalâ B. Rogačëva




Abstract

The article is devoted to researching cultures through a communicative ideal or absolu[1]te commun ,ative value that covers the culture’5 basic communication rules shared by all speakers. This absolute ideal determines the concept of “good” and “bad” speech and is invariably considered when any language or speech unit is used. The intentional structure, themes and style of the communicative ideal cover all types, forms and genres of phatic and non-phatic communication. Communicative ideal also de[1]termines the poetics of human communication within this culture. It s possible to discover a communicative ideal through the language idioms which are formed by lexical units of the language naming the key value concepts of this culture. Good material can also be gained from various reflexives or metalanguage comments, phrases about the language and speech which belong to various spheres and types of com[1]munication. It may also be valuable to study the characters of national (Russian, English, Polish) li[1]terature who may be viewed as the models of the ideal communicative partners within these cultures. The article discusses the probability of experimental study of a communicative ideal. It is also important that a communicative ideal occupies a significant place in the system of statements about the types of the national cultures which are formulated in a semantic pri[1]mitive language. Thus, commun.. ative ideal is formed by values described in a semantic primitive language through simple affirmative formulas: “It’s good if...” Communicauve ideal as a rule is rather simple and clear for every speaker and is usual[1]ly not an object of description and discussion. This mainly dirferentiates the communica[1]tive ideal from various communicative scenarios. However, a communicative ideal can also vary, at least, in some cultures. The typology of communicative concepts and values based on the field model where the centre corresponds with the communicative ideal and the periphery - particular communicative scenan >s, enables to learn different types of communicative concepts va ation for the centre and periphery.

Keywords:

communicative ideal, communicative scenarios, metalanguage comments, speech genres, addressee of speech


Published
2021-04-29

Cited by

Dementʹev, V. V., & Rogačëva, N. B. (2021). Comparative Researching Cultures Through a Communicative Ideal. Stylistyka, 15, 7–36. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3872

Authors

Vadim V. Dementʹev 

Authors

Natalâ B. Rogačëva 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.