Official Acts of a Speech

Ewa Malinowska




Abstract

One of the basic foundation of this study is to acknowledge the official statement as a macroact of a speech, established from specyfic foundations, intentions and attitude of its sender. In this essay there are talked over only the legal macroacts (connected with the normative action of the State organs). Theirs basic elements are creative and directive microacts. In the legal macroacts of a general significance they are both equal to each other, while in the macroacts of an indyvidual significance the creative microact is taking the rule of presupposition - the law base, which is refered by the civil servants. All of the official acts of a speech are connected by the initial terms (person who makes the act has to be authorized), nevertheless they are differed in the basic terms i.e. intentions of a act’s sender. For most of them characteristic is the agreement between literal value and a real intention of the statement.



Published
1996-12-31

Cited by

Malinowska, E. (1996). Official Acts of a Speech. Stylistyka, 5, 323–331. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/4310

Authors

Ewa Malinowska 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.