Nominative Sentences in the Language of Science and Technology in Russian (in Comparison with Serbian)
Andrei Stoânovič
Abstract
Nominative sentences in Russian and Serbian (genre of text-books and manuals) exhibit a high degree of resemblance as to their function: in both languages they perform the function of a title. Some common characteristics are also shown with regard to the means of expression, the most prominent being wide use within titles of deverbative nouns (Nomina actionis), with acquie thus semi-predicative nature. However, more important interlinguistic resemblance is related to differences in the use of verbs: in the Russian titles examined, verbs are most often omitted, whereas in Serbian they are used more freely. It is probably a consequence of differences between the two grammar systems (limited use of participles in modem Serbian).
Although genetic relation between the two Slavic languages is important, future contrastive-stylistic analysis of scientific style should be focused on possible extralinguistic differences (difference in the developmental history of scientific styles and their subsequent growth; differences in language traditions established, in (stylistic) uses accepted; different degree of language editor's interference, etc.).
Authors
Andrei StoânovičStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
