Reprezentatives of the concept MEMORY in a view of the stylistics' tasks

Olʹga V. Evtušenko

Московский государственный лингвистический университет
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5090-4329

Abstract

Starting with the definition of style by K.A. Dolinin, the article proposes to reflect on the perspectives of an interdisciplinary approach to stylistic research, using primarily the achievements of psychology and philosophy, as the style of a literary work is the result of the subject’s choices, which in turn result from his/her individual way of thinking. The interdisciplinary approach will also allow for more effective aesthetic assessment of the work. The article analyses three literary texts based on memories: The childhood years of Bagrov-grandson, serving as a continuation of the Family Chronicle by S.T. Aksakov, The Life of Arsenyev by I.A. Bunin and Be Like Children by V.A. Sharov. On the example of language constructions forming the concept of MEMORY, the researcher shows the factors that influence the choice of language means that ultimately create the individual style of the author. The study proves that this choice is influenced by non-linguistic factors: the situational context, era, the author’s professional and personal experience and education, philosophicaland aesthetic ideas, and other important circumstances that guide the artist’s thinking. Genre rules and current tastes are also of importance. The study shows that the ratio of the number of language constructions regarding experience memory and information memory can characterize the individual style of a given author. It also proves that a broader interdisciplinary view of style allows to see more determinants of the aesthetic value of a work. Among them are: the harmonious structure of the text including its spatial and temporal organization, and the compliance with the broadly understood norm that involves not only the linguistic but also the mental layer of the text, as expressed by appropriately selected means.

Keywords:

style, memory, genre-memory, types of thinking, communication context, choice of language means

Aksakov S. T., 1966, Detskie gody Bagrova-vnuka, sluzhashhie prodolzheniem „Semejjnojj khroniki”. – Sobranie sochinenijj: V 5 tt., t. 1, Moskva, s. 261–575.
  Google Scholar

Bakhtin M. M., 2002, Sobranie sochinenijj: V 7 tt., t. 6, Kaluga.
  Google Scholar

Bunin I. A., 1988, ZHizn Arseneva. – Sobranie sochinenijj: V 4 tt., t. 3, Moskva, s. 265–537.
  Google Scholar

Gadamer G.-G., 1988, Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskojj germenevtiki. Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Gajjda S., 2015, Aktualnye zadachi stilistiki, „Aktualnye problemy stilistiki”, № 1, s. 12–21.
  Google Scholar

Dolinin K. A., 1987, Stilistika francuzskogo języka, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Evtushenko O. V., Ba JU., 2016, Tipologija rechemyslitelnykh operacijj, lezhashhikh v osnove slovotvorchestva. – Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, vyp. 17 (756), s. 26–38.
  Google Scholar

Zaliznjak A. A., 2008, Konceptualizacija PAMJATI i ZABVENIJA v russkom jazyke. – Kognitivnye issledovanija, vyp. 2, red. V. D. Solovev, T. V. CHernigovskaja, Moskva, s. 209–230.
  Google Scholar

Igrunova N. V., 2004, SHarov: „JA ne chuvstvuju sebja ni uchitelem, ni prorokom”, „Druzhba narodov”, № 8, s. 191–198.
  Google Scholar

Liotar ZH.-F., 2013, Sostojanie postmoderna, Sankt-Peterburg.
  Google Scholar

Lukach D., 1985–1987, Svoeobrazie ehsteticheskogo: V 4-kh tt., t. 1 i 3, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Nacionalnyjj korpus russkogo jazyka, URL: http://ruscorpora.ru.
  Google Scholar

Polozhenceva I. V., Kashhenko T. L., 2014, Fenomen istoricheskojj pamjati i aktualizacija lichnojj istoricheskojj pamjati studentov, „Vlast”, № 12, s. 42–46.
  Google Scholar

Tolkovyjj slovar russkogo jazyka: V 4-kh tt., 2000, red. D. N. Ushakov, t. 2, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Ufimceva N. V., 2017, EHtnopsikholingvistika kak razdel teorii rechevojj dejatelnosti. – (Neo)psikholingvistika i (psikho)lingvokulturologija: novye nauki o cheloveke govorjashhem, red. V. V. Krasnykh, Moskva, s. 21–96.
  Google Scholar

KHendriks U., 1980, Stil i lingvistika teksta. – Novoe v zarubezhnojj lingvistike, vyp. IX, Moskva, S. 172–211.
  Google Scholar

KHolodnaja M. A., 2012, Osobennosti organizacii konceptualnykh struktur. – Kognitivnye issledovanija: sbornik nauchnykh trudov, vyp. 5, red. A. A. Kibrik, T. V. CHernigovskaja, A. V. Dubasova, Moskva, s. 177–193.
  Google Scholar

SHarov V. A., 2017, Budte kak deti, Moskva.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31912/rjano-2017.1.3   Google Scholar

SHarov V. A., 2015, Moja kompanija, „Znamja”, № 4, s. 81–82.
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-01-10

Cited by

Evtušenko, O. V. (2020). Reprezentatives of the concept MEMORY in a view of the stylistics’ tasks. Stylistyka, 28, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka28.2019.2

Authors

Olʹga V. Evtušenko 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5090-4329

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.