Linguistic and on-linguistic mechanisms shaping the collective memory in the popular series of historical educational videos “History Uncensored”
Abstract
The subject of interest of the paper is Historia bez Cenzury (“History Uncensored”), a popular series of historical educational videos. The series can be recognised as an effective tool for the shaping of the collective memory of the young generation thanks to the intriguing content of the programme, as well as its linguistic and visual attractiveness. The analysis has revealed two basic communication strategies that serve this purpose; the first is somatisation, that is, concentration on the corporeality of historical figures, and the other is the modernisation of form – which has been used in the series on the linguistic (lexis and phraseology) and the cultural (allusions to the modern world) levels. The aim of the paper is the presentation of linguistic and (to a lesser degree) non-linguistic exponents of these mechanisms.
Keywords:
YouTube, Historia bez Cenzury, collective memory, somatisation, modernisation of form, communication strategiesReferences
Assmann J., 2008, Pamięć kulturowa. Pismo, zapamiętywanie i polityczna tożsamość w cywilizacjach starożytnych, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Bartmiński J., 1981, Derywacja stylu, Lublin.
Google Scholar
Borowiec P., 2013, Czas polityczny po rewolucji. Czas w polskim dyskursie politycznym po 1989 roku, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Czachur W., 2016, Dlaczego pamięć społeczna może być obiektem badań lingwistycznych?, http://www.academia.edu/22173374/Dlaczego_pami%C4%99%C4%87_spo%C5%82eczna_mo%C5%BCe_by%C4%87_obiektem_bada%C5%84_lingwistycznych (dostęp: 15.11.2018).
Google Scholar
Czachur W., 2017, Lingwistyka pamięci. Założenia, zakres badań i metody analizy. – Pamięć w ujęciu lingwistycznym. Zagadnienia teoretyczne i metodyczne, red. W. Czachur, Warszawa, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319998429_Lingwistyka_pamieci_Zalozenia_zakres_badan_i_metody_analizy (dostęp: 01.11.2018).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323530077.pp.7-55
Google Scholar
Dubisz S. (red.), 2003, Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego, t. 1–6, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Hawrysz M., 2012, Polemiczna twórczość Marcina Czechowica w perspektywie genologii lingwistycznej, Zielona Góra.
Google Scholar
Lubaś W. (red.), 2001–2016 Słownik polskich leksemów potocznych, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Malicki K., 2012, „Nudna, statyczna, nieaktualna”. Opinie młodzieży o polskiej edukacji historycznej. – K. Malicki, Pamięć przeszłości pokolenia transformacji, Warszawa, s. 177–190.
Google Scholar
Nijakowski L., 2008, Polska polityka pamięci. Esej socjologiczny, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Ożóg K., 2008, Zmiany we współczesnym języku polskim. – Język a Kultura, t. 20, red. A. Dąbrowska, Wrocław, http://jk.wuwr.pl/preview/-1969.
Google Scholar
Sikora K., 2016, Kilka uwag na temat wulgaryzacji i brutalizacji polszczyzny, „Poznańskie Spotkania Językoznawcze”, 32, https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/psj/article/view/8350.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/psj.2016.32.8
Google Scholar
Szacka B., 2006, Czas przeszły, pamięć, mit, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Szynol A., 2010, Tablidy na polskim rynku – bilans zysków i strat, „Oblicza komunikacji”,
Google Scholar
Witosz B., 2012, O potrzebie perspektywy multimodalnej w badaniach stylistycznych. –Transdyscyplinarność badań nad komunikacją medialną, t. 1: Stan wiedzy i postulaty badawcze, red. M. Kita, M. Ślawska, s. 154–166, https://rebus.us.edu.pl/bitstream/20.500.12128/2556/1/Witosz_O_potrzebie_perspektywy_multimedialnej_w_badaniach_stylistycznych.pdf.
Google Scholar
Wójcicka M., 2014, Pamięć zbiorowa a tekst ustny, Lublin.
Google Scholar
Statistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
