Specific features of communication in Internet discussions

Bohumila Junková



Abstract

Discussions on the Internet show the changes of traditional conception of language styles. Even though the texts are undoubtedly written down they are spontaneous and colloquial Czech is primarily used there. High occurrence of spoken colloquial language can be understood as an attempt to establish a contact with other discussion participants.The dichotomy of speech and writing is disappearing. Slight differences between written and spoken texts are not observed only in everyday communication style of the Internet discussions and that is why traditional distinguishing of speech and writing is not always possible.

Keywords:

everyday communication style, Internet discussions, speech, writing, standard and nonstandard language

Bečka J.V., 1992, Česka stylistika, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Čechova M., Krèmová M., Minářová E., 2008, Současná stylistika, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Chloupek J., 1994, Funkèní styly dnes, „Naše řeč“, 77, s. 57–66.
  Google Scholar

Chloupek J., Èechová M., Krèmová M., Minářová E., 1991, Stylistika češtiny, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Havránek B., Weingart M., 1932, Spisovná čeština a jazyková kultura, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Jedlièka A., Formánková V., Rejmánková M., 1970, Základy české stylistiky, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Junková B., 2010, Jazyková dynamika současné publicistiky, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Junková B., 2011, Reprezentace mluvenosti v nepřipravených psaných textech na internetu. – Jazyk a diskurs v kultúrnom a politickom kontexte, ed. S. Ondrejoviè, Bratislava, s. 198–205.
  Google Scholar

Junková B., 2013, Zpùsoby reprezentace názorù v psaných textech funkèního stylu prostìsdìlovacího na internetu. – Stylistika v kontextu historie a současnosti, eds. K. Klímová, I. Kolářová, J.M. Tušková, Brno, s. 209–214.
  Google Scholar

Junková B., 2014, Názory diskutujících na internetu na přechylování příjmení.– Vlastní jména v textech a kontextech, eds. E. Minářová, D. Sochorová, J. Zítková, Brno, s. 78–83.
  Google Scholar

Junková B., 2017, Agresivita v diskusích na internetu, „Nová čeština doma a ve svìtì“, 1, s. 39–44, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Lakoff G., Johnson M., 2014, Metafory, kterými žijeme, Brno.
  Google Scholar

Minářová E., 2011, Stylistika pro žurnalisty, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Mistrík J., 1985, Štylistika, Bratislava.
  Google Scholar

Ruščák F., 2002, Štylistika epistolárnych textov, Prešov.
  Google Scholar


Published
2019-12-26

Cited by

Junková, B. (2019). Specific features of communication in Internet discussions. Stylistyka, 27, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka27.2018.12

Authors

Bohumila Junková 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.