Current trends of commenting in the Polish daily press
Agnieszka Mac
Abstract
The article focusses on commentary as a text genre in the daily press. The aim of the first part is to present the prototypical marks and characteristic differences of the genre as well as its conditions. The second part discusses possible ways of broadening the genre pattern on the basis of the analysed samples from the daily press of different ranges: newspapers of nationwide, regional, and local range according to selected criteria. The article strives to answer the question about the form of the contemporary press commentary. It also attempts to explain the reasons why journalists tend to depart from the pattern of the genre.
Keywords:
commentary, alternative patterns of commentary, text genres, daily pressReferences
Giessen H.W., 2012, „Was nun Herr Obama?“ Eine quantitative textanalytische und medienlinguistische Untersuchung deutschsprachiger Kommentare über die US-amerikanische Midterm Elections im November 2010 aus unterschiedlichen Zeitungskategorien, samt Versuch einer Kategorisierung.–Persuasionsstile in Europa. Methodologie und Empirie kontrastiver Untersuchungen zur Textsorte Kommentar, Hrsg. H.E.H. Lenk, M. Vesalainen, Hildesheim–Zürich–New York, S. 159–190.
Google Scholar
Lenk H.E.H., 2012, Von der Illokutionsstruktur zum Handlungsweg. Methodologische Überlegungen zur Analyse der Handlungsstruktur von Zeitungskommentaren. – Persuasionsstile in Europa. Methodologie und Empirie kontrastiver Untersuchungen zur Textsorte Kommentar, Hrsg. H.E.H. Lenk, M. Vesalainen, Hildesheim– Zürich–New York, S. 115–158
Google Scholar
Lüger H.-H., 1995, Pressesprache, Tübingen. Lüger H.-H., 2001, Akzeptanzwerbung in Pressekommentaren.–Mediensprache. Medienkritik, Hrsg. U. Breuer, J. Korhonen, Frankfurt am Main, S. 207–224.
Google Scholar
Lüger H.-H., 2002, Berichten und Argumentieren im Konflikt. Akzeptanzwerbung, Desinformation und „rhetorischer Overkill.“–Semantische Aspekte öffentlicher Kommunikation, Hrsg. I. Pohl, Frankfurt am Main, S. 439–468.
Google Scholar
Lüger H.-H., 2015, Kontinuität im Wandel? Journalistisches Kommentieren zwischen Tradition und Innovation.–Quo vadis, Kommunikation? Kommunikation – Sprache – Medien, Hrsg. I.-N. Creþu, Frankfurt am Main, S. 51–71.
Google Scholar
Mac A., 2015, Komentarz i jego warianty w dzisiejszej prasie codziennej.–Gatunki mowy i ich ewolucja. Gatunek a granice, red. D. Ostaszewska, J. Przyklenk, Katowice, s. 304–315.
Google Scholar
Mac A., Szwed I., 2016, Zur Besonderheit der polnischen Presselandschaft und zur Stellung des Kommentars in den Tageszeitungen.–Persuasionsstile in Europa II. Kommentartexte in den Medienlandschaften europäischer Länder, Hrsg. H.E.H. Lenk, Hildesheim–Zürich–New York, S. 203–228.
Google Scholar
Miarecki T., 2001, Komentarz.–Dziennikarstwo od kuchni, red. A. Niczyperowicz, Poznañ, s. 49–61.
Google Scholar
Nowag W., Schalkowski E., 1998, Kommentar und Glosse, Konstanz.
Google Scholar
Wojtak M., 2004, Gatunki prasowe. Lublin.
Google Scholar
Authors
Agnieszka MacStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Agnieszka Mac, Kontrastywna analiza formatu i tematyki wiadomości telewizyjnych w Polsce i Niemczech , Stylistyka: Vol. 20 (2011): Integracja w stylistyce - Integration in Stylistics
- AGNIESZKA MAC, Telewizyjna prognoza pogody – analiza gatunku z perspektywy diachronicznej , Stylistyka: Vol. 32 No. 32 (2023): Stylistyka
