Kultura a styl wypowiedzi autobiograficznej – dyskursywność 1 dzienników Zygmunta Mycielskiego i Stefana Kisielewskiego
Ewa Biłas-Pleszak
Abstract
Discourse, understood as a category of the cognitive character, was applied in this article to analyse the diaries of two Polish composers and feature writers – Stefan Kisielewski and Zygmunt Mycielski, written in the communist Poland. The purpose of the analysis was to show how this special cultural, social and political context was reflected in their works and how it affected their choices as far as the style and topics were concerned. This paper was also supposed to single out various types of discourses and discursive strategies in the authors’ diaries. A particular attention was paid to the selfawareness of the writers and methods of its expression, either in a direct or oblique way, which often requires an active, almost “archaeological” reading that involves revealing new reserves of meanings from under another layer of words. The performed analysis leads to the conclusion that various types of discourses (anti-totalitarian, chronicle, critical and musical, political, intimate) are present in the discussed works. The above conclusion invites one to ask the following question (which sets a further direction in the research): To what extent is it an individual feature of the authors’ works and to what extent is it a certain element of the style of this period?
Keywords:
musical discourse, autobiographical literature, styleReferences
Duszak A., Fairclough N. (red.), 2008, Krytyczna analiza dyskursu: interdyscyplinarne podejście do komunikacji społecznej, Kraków.
Foucault M., 2009, O archeologii nauk. W odpowiedzi Kołu epistemologicznemu. – Język, dyskurs, społeczeństwo, red. L. Rasiński, Warszawa.
Grzeniewski L. B., 1998, Wprowadzenie. – S. Kisielewski, Dzienniki, Warszawa.
Guilhaumou J., Maldidier D., Robin R., 1994, Discours et archive, Liège.
Hejmej A., Hawryszków K., Cudzich-Budniak K. (red.), 2011, Dysonanse. Twórczość Stefana Kisielewskiego (1911–1991), Kraków.
Howarth D., 2008, Dyskurs, Warszawa.
Kiklewicz A., 2012, Czwarte królestwo. Język a kontekst w dyskursach współczesności, Warszawa.
Kisielewski S., 1998, Dzienniki, Warszawa.
Labocha J., 2000, Tekst autobiograficzny jako pewna wizja świata. – Język a kultura. t. 13: Językowy obraz świata i kultura, red., J. Anusiewicz, Wrocław.
Lejeune Ph., 1975, Pakt autobiograficzny, „Teksty”, 5.
Mycielska-Golik Z., 1998, Słowo wstępne. – Z. Mycielski, Niby-dziennik, Warszawa.
Mycielska-Golik Z., 1999, Nota edytorska. – Z. Mycielski, Dzienniki 1950–1959, Warszawa.
Mycielski Z., 1998, Niby-dziennik, Warszawa.
Mycielski Z., 1999, Dzienniki 1950–1959, Warszawa.
Mycielski Z., 2001, Dzienniki 1960–1969, Warszawa.
Stęszewski J., 1999, Zygmunt Mycielski. Kompozytor – pisarz – myśliciel – autorytet. – Z. Mycielski, Dzienniki 1950–1959, Warszawa.
Wiszniowska M., 2011, Felietony Stefana Kisiela. Próba lektury. – Dysonanse. Twórczość Stefana Kisielewskiego (1911–1991), red. A. Hejmej, K. Hawryszków, K. Cudzich-Budniak, Kraków.
Witosz B., 2001, Dziennik pisany nocą – między gatunkowym a indywidualnym stylem wypowiedzi, „Język Artystyczny”, t. 11, red. B. Witosz, Katowice.
Witosz B., 2009, Dyskurs i stylistyka, Katowice.
Authors
Ewa Biłas-PleszakStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Stylistyka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
