Zróżnicowanie wyznaniowe stylu religijnego. Analiza na podstawie polskich modlitw ewangelickich, katolickich i prawosławnych
Aleksandra Pawlikowska
Abstract
The paper is about confessional differences in Polish religious style. In Polish linguistics there is interest in religious communication, but most of the research applies only to Catholic texts. Besides Catholicism, there are many various Christian and non-Christian
religious communities which should be analyzed. The basis for the analysis were prayers of Polish Catholicism, Lutheranism and Orthodoxy. These are three biggest religious communities in Poland. Very important were he structural, pragmatic and cognitive aspects of texts. The method of the analysis was statistics. The statistical analysis showed that there are a lot of differences, especially in
the lexis and pragmatics of prayers, like creation of God and man, speech acts, entropy and redundancy, lexical fields, etc. All of these are determined by theological and ideological rules of the confessions. But it is important to remember that all the texts are still a realization of one style.
Keywords:
religious style, prayer, religious community, Catholicism, Lutheranism, Orthodoxy, statistics, differenceReferences
Bartmiński J., 1995, Styl potoczny. – Język a kultura, potoczność w języku i kulturze, t. 5, red. J. Anusiewicz, F. Nieckula, Wrocław.
Borowik I., 2009, Szkice z socjologii religii, Kraków.
Grzegorszykowa R., 2005, Wypowiedzi religijne jako forma uczestnictwa w sacrum. – Język religijny dawniej i dziś, t. 2, red. S. Mikołajczak, T. Węcławski, Poznań.
Grzelak E., 2005, Zróżnicowanie funkcjonalne języka religijnego. – Język religijny dawniej i dziś, t. 2, red. S. Mikołajczak, T. Węcławski, Poznań.
Kamińska-Szmaj I., 1992, Różnice leksykalne między stylami funkcjonalnymi polszczyzny pisanej, Wrocław.
Kajtoch W., 2011, Językowe obrazy świata w prasie młodzieżowej i alternatywnej, t. 1, Kraków.
Makuchowska M., 1998, Modlitwa jako gatunek stylu religijnego, Opole.
Makuchowska M., 2008, Bibliografia języka religijnego 1945–2005, Tarnów.
Markowski A., 1990, Leksyka wspólna różnym odmianom polszczyzny, t. 1–2, Wrocław.
Mistàik J., 1992, Religiosnyj stil, „Stylistyka”, I, s. 82–89.
Pawlikowska A., Język religijny na tle pięciu stylów polszczyzny pisanej, w druku a.
Pawlikowska A., Język religijny polskiego katolicyzmu, ewangelicyzmu i prawosławia, w druku b.
Religie świata. Encyklopedia PWN, 2008, Warszawa.
Rybka M., Sławek J., O ewolucji funkcji komunikatywnej. Na podstawie porównania katechizmów z wieku XX i współczesnego. – Język katechezy, red. R. Przybylska, W. Przyczyna, Tarnów 2008.
Sambor J., 1972, Słowa i liczby. Zagadnienia językoznawstwa statystycznego, Wrocław.
Winiarska I., 2004, Słownictwo religijne polskiego kalwinizmu na tle terminologii katolickiej, Warszawa.
Wojtak M., 1992, O początkach stylu religijnego w polszczyźnie, „Stylistyka”, I, s. 90–97.
Wojtak M., 2004, Styl religijny w perspektywie genologicznej. – Język religijny dawniej i dziś, t. 1, red. S. Mikołajczak, T. Węcławski, Poznań.
Authors
Aleksandra PawlikowskaStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Stylistyka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Aleksandra Pawlikowska, Funkcje zneosemantyzowanej leksyki religijnej w stylu potocznym , Stylistyka: Vol. 20 (2011): Integracja w stylistyce - Integration in Stylistics
