Przestrzeń lokalna w prasie górnośląskiej XIX w.
Joanna Przyklenk
Abstract
The article is devoted to the Upper-Silesian space understood here not as the matter’s physical attribute, but as a cultural fact which delimits the area of incidents that the local press can include. It is an attempt to identify the textual strategies employed to demarcate the local borders – shared by the sender and the receiver. The strategies acknowledged to be the most interesting were those whose teleological dimension was subordinated to the journalistic practice of creating the sense of regional affinity.
The research confirmed the thesis about the stylistic and genre unification of the Upper-Silesian press in the second half of the 19th century as stemming from the sociopolitical and cultural situation of the region, i.e., predominantly from the lack of the receivers’ reading skills, using the press as a political weapon, or publishers’ concern for winning the readers over. All of the above can be, thus, easily observed in the text, where appeals, addresses and persuasive resources are used in abundance.
The analyses were focused on these elements which create the community of the Upper-Silesian region in the structure of the press message in a multifaceted way: the newspaper as a whole – the press column as a text – the press text. A number of newspaper titles were studied, which showed the strongly-stressed identification of the press makers with the local space – the Upper-Silesian one. The emotional style, explicitly expressed relationship with one’s own community and the use of the primarily spoken genre of speech (e.g., legend) in the written form make the bond stronger, whereas the whereas the goal of “taming” foreign topics was realized through, among others, the textual structure of enumeration or the dialogue.
goal of “taming” foreign topics was realized through, among others, the textual structure of enumeration or the dialogue.
Keywords:
press text, text style, text structure, Upper Silesia, the sense of regional affinityReferences
Gajda S., 1987, Społeczne determinacje nazw własnych tekstów (tytułów). – Socjolingwistyka, t. 6, red. W. Lubaś, Warszawa–Kraków.
Glensk J., 1978, Nakłady prasy polskiej na Śląsku (1789–1939), „Studia Śląskie. Seria nowa”, 34, s. 115–158.
Glensk J., 1989, Rola prasy w budzeniu świadomości narodowej Ślązaków, „Zeszyty Prasoznawcze”, 1 (119), s. 5–14.
Glensk J., 1992, Udział prasy polskiej w odzyskaniu Śląska. – Wszechnica górnośląska, t. 6: Oblicza literackie Śląska, red. J. Malicki, Katowice–Opole–Cieszyn.
Glensk J., 1993, Diariusz prasy polskiej na Śląsku, t. 1: Do 1945 roku, Opole.
Grim E., Prus K., 1924, Paweł Stalmach. Karol Miarka, Katowice.
Grzmil-Tylutki H., 2010, Francuska lingwistyczna teoria dyskursu. Historia. Tendencje. Perspektywy, Kraków.
Kafel M., 1969, Prasoznawstwo. Wstęp do problematyki, Warszawa.
Kowalska A., 1982, Zróżnicowanie socjalne polszczyzny górnośląskiej w drugiej połowie XIX wieku. – Socjolingwistyka, t. 4, red. W. Lubaś, Warszawa–Kraków–Katowice.
Kowalska A., 1992, Szkic do dziejów polskiego języka literackiego na Śląsku do 1922 roku. – Wszechnica górnośląska, t. 6: Oblicza literackie Śląska, red. J. Malicki, Katowice–Opole–Cieszyn.
Madajczyk P., 2005, Obcość jako wyznacznik powstawania i funkcjonowania granic etniczno-narodowych na Górnym Śląsku. – Górny Śląsk wyobrażony: wokół mitów, symboli i bohaterów dyskursów narodowych, red. J. Haubold-Stolle, B. Linek, Opole–Marburg.
Malicki J., 1995, Pamięć i trwanie. Obrzeża staropolskiej kultury, Katowice.
Malinowska E., 1984, W dialogu z czytelnikiem. Teksty literackie w polskiej prasie na Górnym Śląsku w latach 1889–1901, Katowice.
Przywecka-Samecka M., Reiter J., 1960, Bibliografia polskich czasopism śląskich (do 1939 roku), Wrocław.
Ratajewski J., 1992, Obraz polskiej prasy na Górnym i Dolnym Śląsku w drugiej połowie XIX wieku. – Książka polska na Śląsku w drugiej połowie XIX wieku. Zarys problematyki, red. M. Pawłowiczowa, Katowice.
Saratowicz-Stolarzewiczowa J., 1967, Sprawy narodowe w „Zwiastunie Górnośląskim”. – Zeszyty Naukowe WSP w Katowicach. Prace Historycznoliterackie. Studia nad piśmiennictwem śląskim, 4 (40), red. H. Zaremba, Katowice.
Siuciak M., 2011, Historyczne podstawy świadomości narodowej Ślązaków, „Białostockie Archiwum Językowe”, 11, s. 223–235.
Szczurek E., 1995, Styl publicystyczny. – Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, red. S. Gajda, Opole.
Śnieżko D., 2003, Swojskie i obce w kronice uniwersalnej (przykład Marcina Bielskiego), „Teksty Drugie”, 1, s. 23–40.
Witosz B., 2009, Dyskurs i stylistyka, Katowice.
Wolińska O., 1981, Z badań nad językiem prasy śląskiej drugiej połowy XIX wieku. – Perspektywy badań śląskoznawczych. Językoznawstwo. Piśmiennictwo. Folklorystyka, red. D. Simonides, H. Borek, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk–Łódź.
Wolińska O., 1983, Stosunek do języka polskiego i gwary śląskiej w XIX-wiecznych czasopismach górnośląskich. Deklaracje i realizacja. – U. Burzywoda, A. Kowalska, O. Wolińska, Studia z dziejów języka polskiego na Górnym Śląsku w okresie pruskim, Katowice.
Zieniukowa J., 1997, Z badań nad językiem dawnej polskiej prasy Śląska. – Polszczyzna śląska. Historia i współczesność, red. B. Wyderka,
Opole.
Authors
Joanna PrzyklenkStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Stylistyka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
