Constructing a “breakthrough”: News values in Science Magazine’s 2017 ranking of most important discoveries
Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska
Abstract
The objective of this study is to conduct a stylistic analysis of the synopses publicized in the end-of-the-year ranking list of 2017 scientific “breakthroughs” from Science Magazine. The article provides a review of literature on science popularization (also known as science accommodation) and presents the typology of news values and rationalization cues that are used by editors to make science-related coverage both newsworthy and credible at the same time. The article lists the possible ways in which scientific findings can be stylistically constructed as “breakthroughs”. The analysis consists in quantifying and illustrating the typical stylistic maneuvers for framing selected science-related issues as “breakthroughs.” The article concludes with the implications of such constructions for the public understanding of science.
Keywords:
science popularization, journalism, news values, rationalization valuesReferences
Bazerman C., 1988, Shaping Written Knowledge, Madison, Wisconsin.
Google Scholar
Bednarek M., Caple H., 2012, News Discourse, London.
Google Scholar
Bednarek M., Caple H., 2014, Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analyzing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond, “Discourse and Society” 25(2), s. 135-158.
Google Scholar
Bednarek M., Caple H., 2017, The Discourse of News Values, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Bell A., 1991, The Language of News Media, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Biber D., Conrad S., 2009, Register, Genre, and Style, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Boykoff M.T., 2011, Who Speaks for the Climate?: Making Sense of Media Reporting
Google Scholar
on Climate Change, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Bucchi, M., 1998, Science and the Media: Alternative Routes to Scientific Communications, London.
Google Scholar
Entman R.M., 1993, Framing: Towards a clarification of a fractured paradigm, “Journal of Communication” 43(4), s. 51-58.
Google Scholar
Fahnestock J., 1986, Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts, “Written Communication” 3, s. 275-296.
Google Scholar
Galtung J., Ruge M., 1965, The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in four Norwegian newspapers , “Journal of International Peace Research” 2, s. 64-90.
Google Scholar
Guenther L., Ruhrmann G., 2013, Science journalists’ selection criteria and depiction of nanotechnology in German media, “Journal of Science Communication” 12(3), s. 1-17.
Google Scholar
Jensen E., 2012, Scientific sensationalism in American and British press coverage of therapeutic cloning, “Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly” 89(1), s. 40-54.
Google Scholar
Harcup T., O’Neill D., 2001, What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited, “Journalism Studies” 2(2), s. 261-280.
Google Scholar
Hyland K., 2000, Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing, Harlow.
Google Scholar
Kitzinger J., 2007, Framing and frame analysis.– Media Studies: Key Issues and Debates, ed. E. Devereux, London, s. 144-161.
Google Scholar
Kitzinger J., Williams C., 2005, Forecasting science futures: Legitimising hope and calming fears in the embryo stem cell debate , “Social Science and Medicine” 61, s. 731-740.
Google Scholar
Kuhn T., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago.
Google Scholar
Latour B., 1987, Science in Action, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska K., 2015, Pragmalinguistic categories in discourse analysis of science journalism, “Lodz Papers in Pragmatics” 11(2), s. 157-179.
Google Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska K., 2016, Framing disease, ageing and death in popular science journalism, “Brno Studies in English” 42(1), s. 49-69.
Google Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska K., 2017a, Stylistic analysis of headlines in science journalism: A case study of New Scientist, “Public Understanding of Science” 26(8), s. 894-907.
Google Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska K., 2017b, Communicating environmental science beyond academia:Stylistic patterns of newsworthiness in popular science journalism, “Discourse & Communication” 11(1), s. 69-88.
Google Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska K., 2017c, Journalistic practices of science popularization in the context of users’ agenda: A case study of New Scientist, “Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica” 5(43), s. 93-109.
Google Scholar
Nelkin D., 1995, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology, New York
Google Scholar
Perez-Llantada C., 2012, Scientific Discourse and the Rhetoric of Globalization, London.
Google Scholar
Richardson J.E., 2007, Analysing Newspapers. An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis, Basingstoke.
Google Scholar
Risbey J.S., 2008, The new climate change discourse: Alarmist or alarming , “Global Environmental Change” 18, s. 26-37.
Google Scholar
Authors
Katarzyna Molek-KozakowskaStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska, The advantages of applying the concept of rhetorical style in language-oriented Journalism Studies , Stylistyka: Vol. 25 (2016): Gajda i stylistyka
- Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska, Visual culture and the style of college textbooks: a critical study , Stylistyka: Vol. 22 (2013): Styl w kulturze
- Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska, The style of EU directives and the discourse of expert rationality , Stylistyka: Vol. 23 (2014): Dyskurs i styl
- Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska, Rhetorical Styles in Internet-Mediated Political Discourse Concerning Polish Gender Parity Debate 2009/2010 , Stylistyka: Vol. 19 (2010): Style a media
- Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska, Stylistics across disciplines , Stylistyka: Vol. 20 (2011): Integracja w stylistyce - Integration in Stylistics