Epistemic situation as a semantic unit of scientific texts in stylistic and rhetorical aspects: (towards term development)
Marija P. Kotjurova
Abstract
The article deals with the epistemic situation understood as a semantic unit of scientific texts. An epistemic situation comprises the substantial aspects of the content – ontological (represented by the terminized concept), methodological (how knowledge is acquired and in what form it is verbalized) and axiological (correlated with value characteristics of knowledge). A language system possesses a wide range of means that can explain the epistemic situation. The rhetorical analysis consists of determining the dominant characteristics of the text, conditioned by dynamics of the epistemic situation – the dynamics which help to appeal to the addressee.
Keywords:
scientific text, scientific knowledge, semantic unit of scientific text, epistemic situation, stylistic analysis, rhetorical effectReferences
Arutûnova N. D., 1999, Âzyk i mir čeloveka, Moskva: Âzyki russkoj kulʹtury. 896 s.
Google Scholar
Baženova E. A., 2001, Naučnyj tekst v aspekte politekstualʹnosti, Permʹ.
Google Scholar
Baženova E. A., 2005, Diskursivno-stilističeskij podhod k izučeniû naučnogo teksta, „Stylistyka", XIV, Opole, s. 317-334.
Google Scholar
Baženova E. A., 2014, Diskursivno-stilističeskij analiz teksta, „ Stylistyka ". XXIII, Opole, с. 9-18.
Google Scholar
Bedrina I. S., 2001, K obosnovaniû kategorii predšestvuûŝego znaniâ (PZ) v naučnom tekste.Stereotipnostʹ i tvorčestvo v tekste: mežvuz. sb. nauč. trudov, pod red. M. P. Kotûrovoj, vyp. 4, Permʹ, s. 157-178.
Google Scholar
Belozerova N. P., 2010, Mir realʹnyj i mir virtualʹnyj: dve èkologičeskie sistemy?, Tûmenʹ: Izd-vo Tûmensk. gos. un-ta, 252 s.
Google Scholar
Birkin A. A., 2009, Priroda reči, Moskva: Izdatelʹstvo«Likvidaciâ bezgramotnosti», 384 s.
Google Scholar
Bondarko A. V., 2002, Teoriâ značeniâ v sisteme funkcionalʹnoj grammatiki: Na materiale russkogo âzyka, Moskva: Âzyki slavânskoj kulʹtury, s. 99-114.
Google Scholar
Zalevskaâ A. A., 1985, Informacionnyj tezaurus čeloveka kak baza rečemyslitelyûj deâtelʹnosti, Issledovanie rečevogo myšleniâ v psiholingvistike, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Karcev V. P., 1984. Socialʹnaâ psihologiâ nauki i problemy istoriko-naučnyh issledovanij. Moskva.
Google Scholar
Kožina M. N., 2002, Stilistika i ritorika v ih vzaimootnošenii, Rečevedenie i funkcionalʹnaâ stilistika: voprosy teorii. Izbrannye trudy, Permʹ, s. 126-149.
Google Scholar
Kotûrova M. P., 1983, Èvolûciâ vyraženiâ svâznosti reči v naučnom stile XVIII-XX vv., Permʹ. 96 s.
Google Scholar
Kotûrova M. P., 1998, Naučnyj tekst i ego celʹnostʹ, „Stylistyka", VII, Opole, с. 329-342.
Google Scholar
Kotûrova M. P., 20 1 1 , Diskursivno-stilističeskoe rassmotrenie stereotip¬nosti reči (Na materite tekstov naučnyh statej). «Stereotipnostʹ i tvorčestvo v tekste», vyp. 15, pod red. M. P. Kotûrovoj, Permʹ, s. 46-61.
Google Scholar
Kotûrova M. P., 2015, Slova širokoj èpistemičeskoj semantiki i ih funkcii v naučnom tekste (v pečati).
Google Scholar
Kotûrova M. P., Baženova E. A., 2008, Kulʹtura naučnoj reči: Tekst i ego redaktirovanie, Moskva: Flinta: Nauka, 280 s.
Google Scholar
Kotûrova M. P., 1996. Vyraženie èpistemičeskoj situacii v periferijnyh tekstah celogo proizvedeniâ. — Očerki istorii naučnogo stilâ russkogo literaturnogo âzyka XVIII-XX ev, pod red. M. N. Kožinoj: v 3 t., t. II, č. 1, Stilistika naučnogo teksta (obŝie parametry), glava XI, Permʹ: Izd-vo Perm. un-ta.
Google Scholar
Râbceva N. K., 2005, Âzyk i estestvennyjintellekt, Moskva: Akademia, s. 57-75.
Google Scholar
Gajda S., 1982, Podstawy badań stylistycznych nad językiem polskim.
Google Scholar
Authors
Marija P. KotjurovaStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
