What hinders the description of speech phenomena?: From audiomutitas congenital aphasia and alalia to specific language impairment (SLI)

Grażyna Jastrzębowska



Abstract

This article, dedicated to Professor Stanis³aw Gajda because of his anniversary, raises theoretical issues of accuracy and explicitness of terms used in science which are familiar to him. Logopaedics, by virtue of its interdisciplinary character and exposure to borderline of numerous and often very distant from each other sciences such as anatomy, linguistics or physics, significantly uses appropriate for these sciences tools of descriptions (frequently doubling notions) and thus, it represents a very good example of discipline in which unnecessary overgrowth of terminology makes it difficult to track research results and quality analysis of phenomena. Specific Language Impairment (SLI) is one of those phenomena which, despite numerous trials of finding consensus and settlement on forums of international assemblies, is still differently termed (what suggests the title of this article). On the basis of this phenomenon uniquely interesting for researchers due to its multiformity and changeable character of dysfunction, the author endeavours to indicate how important for the progress of research and exchange of scientific thought is to operate unitary, unambiguous nomenclature and how much justified is the discourse dedicated to cultivating of description tools.

Keywords:

speech terminology, audiomutitas, alalia, dyslalia, speech development disorder of aphasia type, specific language impairment (SLI)

Bishop D.V.M., 1992, The underlying nature of specific language impairment, „Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry”, vol. 33.
  Google Scholar

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fifth edition) – DSM-V, 2013, Washington.
  Google Scholar

Gałkowski T., Jastrzêbowska G. (red.), 2003, Logopedia – pytania i odpowiedzi. Podręcznik akademicki, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Grabias S., 1991, Logopedia, jej przedmiot i stopień zaawansowania refleksji metanaukowej.–Przedmiot logopedii, red. S. Grabias, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Grabias S., 1997, Mowa i jej zaburzenia, „Audiofonologia”, t. 10.
  Google Scholar

Jastrzębowska G., 2000, Istota i klasyfikacje opóźnień w rozwoju mowy – przegląd stanowisk, „Logopedia”, t. 28.
  Google Scholar

Jastrzębowska G., 2001, Z metodologii opisu alalii (afazji, dysfazji rozwojowej).–Zaburzenia mowy. Mowa – teoria – praktyka, red. S. Grabias, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Jastrzębowska G., 2002, SLI: specyficzne upośledzenie rozwoju języka.–Człowiek wobec ograniczeń, red. G. Jastrzębowska, Z. Tarkowski, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Jastrzębowska G., 2003, Afazja, dysfazja dziecięca.–Logopedia – pytania i odpowiedzi. Podręcznik akademicki, red. T. Gałkowski, G. Jastrzębowska, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Jastrzębowska G., 2005, Zaburzenia rozwoju mowy i języka – terminologia i kategoryzacje stosowane w krajach zachodnich. – Podstawy neurologopedii. Podręcznik akademicki, red, T. Gałkowski, E. Szeląg, G. Jastrzębowska, Opole 2005.
  Google Scholar

Jastrzębowska G., 2013a, Kilka refleksji o polskiej terminologii logopedycznej (dyslalia; opóźnienie rozwoju mowy – opóźniony rozwój mowy).–Język. Człowiek. Społeczeństwo, red. J. Panasiuk, T. Woźniak, Lublin.
  Google Scholar

Jastrzębowska G., 2013b, Opóźnienie rozwoju języka a ryzyko dysleksji rozwojowej, „Logopedia Silesiana”, t. 2.
  Google Scholar

Kordyl Z., 1968, Psychologiczne problemy afazji dziecięcej, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Leonard L.B., 2000, Children with Specific Language Impairment, London.
  Google Scholar

Pużyński S., Wciórka J. (red.), 1997, Międzynarodowa statystyczna klasyfikacja chorób i problemów zdrowotnych ICD-10. Klasyfikacja zaburzeń psychicznych i zaburzeń zachowania. Opisy kliniczne i wskazówki diagnostyczne, Kraków–Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Rapin I., 1996, Practitioner review: Developmental language disorders: A clinical update, „Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry”, vol. 6.
  Google Scholar

Robertson S.B., Weismer S.E., 1999, Effects of treatment on linguistic and social skills in toddlers with delayed language development, „Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research”, vol. 42.
  Google Scholar

Styczek I., 1980, Logopedia, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Zaleski T., 1992, Opóźniony rozwój mowy, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Zaleski T., 1993, Opóźniony rozwój mowy.–Diagnoza i terapia zaburzeń mowy, red. T. Gałkowski, Z. Tarkowski, T. Zaleski, Lublin.
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-01-10

Cited by

Jastrzębowska, G. (2020). What hinders the description of speech phenomena?: From audiomutitas congenital aphasia and alalia to specific language impairment (SLI). Stylistyka, 25, 543–554. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka.25.2016.35

Authors

Grażyna Jastrzębowska 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.