Unctional-Stylistic Method o f the Analysis as the Relevant Principle of Studying Laws Textformation
Natal’â V. Danilevskaâ
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of evaluation in scientific knowledge. The author substantiates specific role of evaluation in scientific text. Evaluation is being presented as axiological component of cognitive activity that takes active part in the process of composing scientific production. The author differentiates “cognitive evaluation” and traditional understanding of evaluation as a scalę “good - neutral - bad” and States that evaluation penetrates through the entire fabric of scientific text and so can be called the “energy” of mechanism of text making.
Keywords:
functional stylistics, discursive analyses, development o f the text, cognitive evaluation, dynamics of cognitionReferences
Балли Ш., 1961, Французская стилистика, Москва.
Блакар Р.М., 1987, Язык как инструмент социальной власти, Язык и моделирование социального взаимодействия, Москва.
Данилевская Н.В., 2005, Роль оценки в механизме развертывания научного текста, Пермь.
Изард К., 1999, Психология эмоций, пер. с англ., Санкт-Петербург.
Ким В.В., Блажевич Н.В., 1998, Язык науки: Философско-методологические аспекты, Екатеринбург.
Кинцель А.В., 2000, Психолингвистическое исследование эмоционально-смысловой доминанты как текстообра іующего фаі :тора, Барнаул.
Кожина М.Н., 1986, О диалогичности письменной научной речи, Пермь.
Кожина М.Н., 1993, Стилистика русского языка: учеб, для студ. пед. ин-тов., 3-е изд., перераб. и доп., Москва.
Кожина М.Н., 1995, Целый текст как объект стилистики текста, „stylistyka”!. IV, s. 33-53.
Кожина М.Н., 2000, Предмет риторики в парадигме речеведческих дисциплин (взгляд со стороны стилистики). Стереотипность и творчество в тексте, Пермь.
Кожина М.Н., 2004, Дискурсный анализ и функциональная стилистика с речеведческих позиций, Текст - Дискурс - Стиль: сб. науч. ст. Санкт-Пеі ербург.
Кожина М.Н., Дускаева Л.Р., Салимовский В. А., 2008, Стилистика русского языка: учебник, Москва.
Леонтьев А. А., 2001, Деятельный ум (Деятельность, Знак, Личность), Москва.
Лурия А.Р., 1979, Язык и сознание, Москва.
Одинцов В.В., 1982, Композиционные типы речи, Функциональные типы русской речи, Москва.
Петров М.К., 1992, Самосознание и научное творчество, Ростов-на-Дону.
Рубинштейн С.Л., Основы общей психологии, т. 2, Москва.
Рябцева Н.К., 1996, Теоретическое и лексикографическое описание научного изложения, науч. докл. по опубликованным трудам, представленный к тащите на соиск. учен. степ. докт. филол. наук., Москва.
Серио П., 1999, Как читают тексты во Франции, Вступительная статья, Квадратура смысла, Москва.
Славин А.В., 1976, Проблема возникновения нового знания, Москва.
Смирнов С.Д., 1985, Психология образа: проблема активности психологического отражения, Москва.
Чернявская В.Е., 2004, Текст как интердискурсивное событие, Текст - - Дискурс - Стиль: сб. науч. ст. Санкт-Петербург.
Larson Ch.U., 1995, Persuasion: reception and responsibility, Belmont.
Authors
Natal’â V. DanilevskaâStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Stylistyka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
