Kontrastywna analiza formatu i tematyki wiadomości telewizyjnych w Polsce i Niemczech

Agnieszka Mac




Abstract

This paper aims to analyze TV news of selected public information magazine programs in Poland and Germany. The contrastive analysis encompasses TV news of the first German national channel ARD and the first Polish national channel TVP1. The focus of the analysis lies on the comparison of framed programs and information service topics broadcast in the two countries’ TV stations during the time when the main topie of all TV news both in Poland and Germany was the radical change in Egypt (selected information services in January and February in 2011). The following aspects have been thoroughly analyzed: service format, share of the hard news and the soft news as well as the national and intemational news of the information magazine during the given time as well as time dedicated to the main topie of the day.What can be inferred from the contrastive analysis of the information services of the national channels in Poland (TVP1) and Germany (ARD) is that the same information function performed within the same format may show many various differences. While the news on TVP1 seems to compete for larger audiences (i.e., greater share of the sensational news and soft news, the role of the anchor person), the ARD-news continues to prefer a certain sound tradition by offering a classical type of information service, stressing a serious national and intemational information. The decision to keep an unchanged TV news presentation guarantees the ARD-news a strong market share in the information sector among other public and commercial TV stations.

Keywords:

television, television news, contrastive Polish-German analysis, channel format, news topics

Bauer Z., 2008, Gatunki dziennikarskie. - Dziennikarstwo i świat mediów, Z. Bauer, E. Chudziński, red., Kraków, s. 255-280.

Godzić, W., 2004, Telewizja i jej gatunki, Kraków.

Greule, A., Burghardt, M., 2002, Information, Infotainment, Infodrama? Zur Frage nach der sprachlich-motivierten Dramatisierung der Fernsehnachrichten. — Semanti- sche Aspekte offentlicher Kommunikation, 1. Pohl, red., Frankfurt am Main, s. 279-304.

Holly, W., 2004, Fernsehen, Tiibingen.

Ludes, P., Schiitte, G., Staab, J.F., 2002, Entwicklung, Funktion, Prasentationsformen und Texttypen der Fernsehnachrichten. - Medienwissenschaft. Ein Handbuch zur Entwicklung der Medien und Kommunikationsformen, J.-F. Leonhard, H.-W. Ludwig, D. Schwarze, E. StraBner, red., Berlin, New York, s. 2308-2321.

Mrozowski, M., 2001, Media masowe: władza, rozrywka, biznes, Warszawa.

Muckenhaupt, M., 1994, Fon der Tagesschau zur Infoshow. Sprachliche und journalistische Tendenzen in der Geschichte der Fernsehnachrichten. — Tendenzen der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, H.-J. Heringer i in., red., Tiibingen, s. 81-120.

Pisarek, W., 1974, Typologia programów telewizyjnych, „Zeszyty prasoznawcze” R. XV, nr 1(59), s. 23-32.

Pisarek, W., 2008, Podstawy retoryki dziennikarskiej. — Dziennikarstwo i świat mediów, Z. Bauer, E. Chudziński, red., Kraków, s. 361-377.

Schmitz, U., 2004, Sprache in modernen Medien, Berlin.

Tetelowska, L, 1966, Informacja - odrębny gatunek dziennikarski, „Zeszyty prasoznawcze”, z. 1-2, s. 16-33.

Uszyński, J., 2008, Genologia telewizyjna. - Dziennikarstwo i świat mediów, Z. Bauer, E. Chudziński, red., Kraków, s. 281-299.

Wittwen, A., 1995, Infotainment. Fernsehnachrichten zwischen Information und Unterhaltung, Bem.

Wojtak, M., 2004, Gatunki prasowe, Lublin.

Wolny-Zmorzyński, K., Kaliszewski, A., Furman, W., 2009, Gatunki dziennikarskie, Warszawa.

Published
2021-01-21

Cited by

Mac, A. . (2021). Kontrastywna analiza formatu i tematyki wiadomości telewizyjnych w Polsce i Niemczech. Stylistyka, 20, 233–249. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3458

Authors

Agnieszka Mac 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2011 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.