Problematika styloreho hodnoceni frekventovanych unirerbizdtu v textech raźnych stylovych oblasti

Ivana Kolářová




Abstract

The article focuses on „univerbizates”, lexical units that were formed by fusion of multiverbal lexemes into a one-word lexemes, whose freąuency in the Czech National Corpus SYN is more than 300 and only 4-2x lower than the freąuency of their underlying multiverbal lexemes. There are monitored the univerbizates with high freąuency in the texts of various stylish spheres. The texts with freąuented univerbizates evidence that the uniyerbizates with freąuency comparable to the freąuency of underlying multiverbal lexemes are often stylish neutral or they are used terminologically, but some freąuented uniyerbizates are substandard - colloąuial (conversational), for example prumyslovka, obćanka, ridićak, or expressive, for example papiftak, spacak. Some uniyerbizates that were taken for expressive and slangy are taken for terminological, for example kopirka.

Keywords:

Czech National Corpus, multiverbal lexeme, univerbizat, reąuency, freąuented uniyerbizates, style, stylish sphere

Ćechova M., Krćmova M., Minarova E., 2008, Soućasna stylistika, Praha: 1SV.

Ćermak F., Blatna R. a kol., 2005, Jak vyuźivat Ćesky narodni korpus, Praha: Nakladatelstvi Lidove noviny.

Ćermak F., Filipec J., 1985, Ćeska lexikologie, Praha: Academia.

Dokulil M., 1967, Tvoreni slov v ćeśtine 2. Odvozovani podstatnych jmen, Praha: Academia.

Hebal-Jezierska M. 2008, Vyzkum morfologicke variantnosti prostrednictvim ĆNK. - Śticha F., Fried M., eds., Grammar & Corpora. Gramatika a korpus 2007, Praha: Academia, s. 345-351.

Horalik J., 1967, O univerbizaci a homonymii z hlediska principu ekonomie, „Ćeskoslovenska rusistika” 12, s. 140-142.

Hubaćek J., 2003, Vyberovy slovnik ćeskych slangu, Ostrava: Profil.

Chloupek J., Ćechova M., Krćmova M., Minarova E., 1991, Stylistika ćeśtiny, Praha: SPN.

Jedlicka A., 1969, Univerbizace a multiverbizace v pojmenovavacich strukturach. „Slavica Pragensia” 11, s. 93-101.

Karlik P., Nekula M., Pleskalova J. a kol., 2002, Encyklopedicky slovnik ćeśtiny, Praha: Nakladatelstvi Lidove noviny.

Karlik P., Nekula M., Ruslnova Z. a kol., 1996, Prirućni mluvnice ćeśtiny, Praha: Nakladatelstvi Lidove noviny.

Orłoś T. Z., 2008, O czeskich nazwach kulinarnych, „Bohemistyka” VIII, s. 359—362.

Slovnik spisovne ćeśtiny pro śkolu a verejnost, 2005, Praha: Academia.Slovnik spisovneho jazyka ćeskeho I-YIll, 1989, Praha: Academia.

Sochova Z., 1966, K slovotvorne a stylotvorne charakteristice mluveneho jazyka, „Naśe reć” 49, s. 81-87.

Szczepańska E., 1994, Uniwerbizacja w języku czeskim i polskim, Kraków: Universitas.

Śticha F., Klimova J., 2006, K moźnostem a mezim sujixalni derivace substantiv. - Śticha, F., ed., Moźnosti a meze ćeske gramatiky, Praha: Academia, s. 127—138.

Śticha, F., Usage, freąuency, and grammaticality. — Śticha F., Fried M., eds., Grammar & Corpora. Gramatika a korpus 2007, Praha: Academia, s. 285-291.

Ćesky narodni korpus, dostupny na adrese http://ucnk.fF.cuni.cz/struktura.php

Published
2021-01-22

Cited by

Kolářová , I. (2021). Problematika styloreho hodnoceni frekventovanych unirerbizdtu v textech raźnych stylovych oblasti. Stylistyka, 20, 363–379. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3477

Authors

Ivana Kolářová  

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2011 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.


Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>