Między rzeczywistością a ideałem— o profilowaniu obrazu demokracji w polskim i niemieckim dyskursie feministycznym
Monika Grzeszczak
Abstract
The goal of the article is to analyze the image of democracy in Polish and German feminism discourse, the way democracy is conceptualized and differentiated. The Author uses the defmite notions applied in ethnolinguistic analyses conducted by the Lublin Eth- nolinguistic School, such as: profiling the notions, projile, thepoint of view, interpretation perspective. The analysis of the collected data leads to the dififerentiation of two basie profiles of democracy: to the real one (oriented towards description) and to the ideał one (expressed with postulates), where the real profile dominates in the discourse of Polish feminism and the ideał profile - in the discourse of German feminism. In the framework of the chief profiles, the Author points out the political profiles in the following discourses: the profile of world-view in Polish discourse, and the social one - in German discourse. The given analysis shows different points of view: the Polish feminists talk about domi- nating and the redundant role of men (in politics particularly), whereas the German feminists talk about the of women in political, social and professional spheres. The presented differences occur as the result of the accepted values. In Polish discourse democracy is used in collocations with the following notions - values: równoace (equality (of rights)), wolnoceoe (freedom, independence), normalnooece (normalization, standarization), whereas in German discourse we meet Gerechtigkeit (justice, equity, faimess), Frieden (pe- ace), Gewaltfreiheit (the absence of violence, coercion, constraint), Wohlstand (welfare, wellbeing, prosperity).
Keywords:
profiling, democracy, discourse, Polish, German, feminismReferences
Bartmiński J., 2006, Niektóre problemy i pojęcia etnolingwistyki lubelskiej, „Etnolingwistyka”, nr 18, s. 77-90.
Bartmiński J., 2007, Wartości i ich profile medialne, (Referat wygłoszony na konferencji „Ideologie w słowach, gestach i obrazach” z cyklu „Oblicza komunikacji 2”, Wrocław 16-17 IV 2007) [tekst w druku]
Bartmiński J., Panasiuk J., 2007, Stereotypy językowe we współczesnym języku polskim. - Bartmiński J., Stereotypy mieszkają w języku. Studia etnolingwistyczne, Lublin, s. 85-105.
Bartmiński J., Niebrzegowska S., 1998, Profile a podmiotowa interpretacja świata. -] Profilowanie w języku i w tekście, Bartmiński J., Tokarski R., red., Lublin, s. 211-224.
Dahl R.A., 1993/2000, O demokracji, przełożył M. Król, Kraków.
DEWKób — Kóbler G., Deutsches Etymologisches Worterbuch, [b.m.] 1995, s. 77. [w formacie pdf na stronie http://www.koeblergerhard.de/derwbhin.html]
Fleischer M„ 1999, Symbolika kolektywna w Polsce i w Niemczech (porównanie interkulturowe), „Etnolingwistyka”, t. 11, s. 69-106.
Dijk T.A., van, 2003, Dyskurs polityczny i ideologia, „Etnolingwistyka”, t. 15, s. 7-28.
Grzegorczykowa R., 2009, Punkty dyskusyjne w rozumieniu pojęcia językowego obrazu świata — widziane z perspektywy badań porównawczych referat wygłoszony na konferencji w Opolu 27 V 2009]
Grzeszczak M., 2009, Der Begrijf demokracja .Demokratie 'im Gegenwartspolnisch. Persach einer kognitiven Definition. — Europa undseine Werte. Akten der internationa- len Arbeitstagung Normen und Wertbegriffe in der Perstandigung zwischen Ost- und IPesteuropa 3./4. April 2008, J. Bartmiński, R. Liihr (wyd.) [artykuł w druku]
NSEJPKurcz - Długosz-Kurczabowa K., Nowy słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, Warszawa 2003, s. 99—100.
Śpiewak P., 2004, Obietnice demokracji, Warszawa.
Authors
Monika GrzeszczakStatistics
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Stylistyka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
