Rhetorical Styles in Internet-Mediated Political Discourse Concerning Polish Gender Parity Debate 2009/2010

Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska




Abstract

The aim of this study is to describe the stylistic features of Internet-mediated political discourse, basing on two samples of hypertextual materials authored by organizations promoting (Kongres Kobiet the Congres of Women, abbr. KK) and criticizing (Antyparytety - Antiparity, abbr. AP) the Polish gender parity initiative of 2009/2010. Firstly, the notion of rhetorical style is introduced in the context of political discourse analysis. Accordingly, rhetorical styles are understood here broadly as emergent properties of texts characterized by clusters of linguistic devices used strategically for persuasive purposes. Next, the methodological framework for the ensuing stylistic analysis is delineated and the “critical” angle of the present study is elucidated. In the course of analysis of two samples of texts (KK - approx. 2080 words; AP approx 1930 words) representing antagonistic positions in the gender parity debate, it is demonstrated that there are more similarities than differences between their rhetorical styles. By focusing on the interrogation of such categories as generic frames, strategies of addressing the reader and pervasive rhetorical figures, it has been shown that both styles exemplify a high degree of saturation with persuasion-oriented linguistic devices. This makes both analyzed styles to some extent manipulative, since they tend to efface rational argumentation for the sake of appeals to emotions and employ some classic propagandists tricks (e.g. glittering generalities, stereotyping, simplification or testimonials). Yet, it seems that the opponents of the gender parity initiative (AP) rely on such devices more heavily, as their texts are mainly oriented towards discrediting the project by arising readers’ doubt and anxiety. The proponents (KK), after all, must also inform the readers about the details of their initiative and present sound reasons why it should be embraced. That is why the rhetorical style emerging in AP corpus seems to be shaped primarily by linguistic devices of pathos, while the rhetorical style of KK’s texts relies on logos and ethos.

Keywords:

rhetorical style, political discourse, critical discourse analysis, gender parity, Internet-mediated communication

Anderson B., 1984, Imagined community: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, London: Verso.
  Google Scholar

Bakhtin M., 1986, Speech genres and other late essays, edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist, translated by V. W. McGee, Austin: University of Texas Press.
  Google Scholar

Billig M., 1995, Banal nationalism, London: Sage.
  Google Scholar

Butler J., 1990, Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion o f identity, New York: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Chilton P. and Schaffner Ch., 2002, Politics as text and talk, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  Google Scholar

Curran J. and Seaton J., [1980] 2003, Power without responsibility: The press, broadcasting and new media in Britain, London: Taylor and Francis.
  Google Scholar

Dobek-Ostrowska B., 2007, Komunikowanie polityczne i publiczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  Google Scholar

Fairclough N., 1989, Language and power, Harlow: Longman.
  Google Scholar

Fairclough N., 1995, Media discourse, London: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Fairclough N., 2000, New Labour, new language?, London: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Fetzer A. and Lauerbach G. E., 2007, Political discourse in the media, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  Google Scholar

Goban-Klas T., 2006, Media i komunikowanie masowe. Teorie i analizy prasy, radia, telewizji i Internetu, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  Google Scholar

Gruber H., 2008, Analysing communication in the new media - Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences, edited by R. Wodak and M. Krzyżanowski, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 54-76.
  Google Scholar

Halliday M., 1985, Introduction to functional grammar, London: Edward Arnold.
  Google Scholar

Levinson S. 1979, Activity types and language, “Linguistics” 17(5/6), 356-399.
  Google Scholar

McLuhan M., 1964, Understanding media: The extensions of man, London: Routledge
  Google Scholar

and Kegan Paul.
  Google Scholar

Montgomery M., 2007, The discourse of broadcast news: A linguistic approach, London: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Nichols B., 2001, Introduction to documentary, Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
  Google Scholar

Selting M., 1999, Communicative style Handbook o f pragmatics, edited by J. Verschueren et al., Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1-33.
  Google Scholar

Stokes J., 2003, How to do media and cultural studies, London: Sage.
  Google Scholar

Tannen D., 1999, The argument culture. Stopping America s war of word, New York: Ballantine Books.
  Google Scholar

Thomborrow J., 2002, Power talk. Language and interaction in institutional discourse, Harlow: Longman.
  Google Scholar

Tokarz M., 2007, Ocena społeczna - teoria i wnioski praktyczne Mechanizmy perswazji i manipulacji: Zagadnienia ogólne, edited by G. Hebrajska, Łask: Oficyna Wydawnicza Leksem, 73-94.
  Google Scholar

van Dijk T.A., 1993, Elite discourse and racism, London: Sage.
  Google Scholar

van Dijk T.A., 1998, Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach, London: Sage.
  Google Scholar

Wodak R., 2009, The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2010-12-02

Cited by

Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2010). Rhetorical Styles in Internet-Mediated Political Discourse Concerning Polish Gender Parity Debate 2009/2010. Stylistyka, 19, 145–160. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3535

Authors

Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.