Èpatažnostʹ kak stilevaâ dominanta setevyh SMI

Tat’âna B. Karpova




Abstract

The article describes that network mass media which appeared as a new type of discourse in the Russian-speaking sector of the internet - runet — morę than ten years ago are active- ly forming in the socio-cultural space of Russia. It mentions both generał features for the network and traditional mass media and specific ones characteristic only for network edi- tions, conditioned at first by technical possibilities of the internet (hypertextuality, inte- ractivity, multimediability, etc).The major content of the publication is connected with the display of speech epatage as the style dominant of the texts in network mass media. It is shown, for example, that the first phrase of the text (its peculiar headline-“hook”) is devoted arousing maximum inte- rest of the reader, to “hook” him and thus it is epatageous by its naturę, destination. Such a phrase tums out often to be units having both linguistic and cultural meaning, called lo- goepisystems or logoepisystemoids (transformed logoepisystems).The main idea of the article is that the traditional publicistic pathos of mass media has changed on the internet to the tonality of total irony and language gamę, resulting in the fact that the text is perceived as an enigma to be not only read, but rather unriddled.

Keywords:

network mass media, epatageability, style characteristics

Анненков А., 2006, Сеть и массовая информация, Мир 1п1егпе1, № 9.

Бурвикова Н.Д., Костомаров В.Г., 2006, Жизнь в мимолетных мелочах, Санкт-Петербург.

Дускаева Л.Р., 2007, Речевой эпатаж на современном отечественном телевидении, Элекронные средства массовой информации вчера, сегодня, завтра, Санкт-Петербург.

Засурский Я.Н., 2000, Журналистика и мир на рубеже тысячелетий, От книги до Интернета, Москва.

Костомаров В.Г., 2005, Наш язык в действии. Очерки современной русской сти¬листики, Москва.

Кузнецова О.В., 2001, Эпатажное поведение телевизионного журналиста как ос¬обая разновидность коммуникативного стиля, Концептуальная картина мира и интерпретативное поле текста с позиций лингвистики, журналистики и коммуникативистики, Барнаул.

Лукина М.М., 2006, СМИ в Интернете, Средства массовой информации России: Учеб, пособие / Под ред. Я.Н.Засурского, Москва.

Скороходова Е.Ю., 2007, Современное состояние функционально-стилистической системы русского литературного языка, “Вопросы филологии”, №1 (25), Москва.

Сметанина С.И., 2001, Тексты СМИ в системе культуры, Русский язык на рубеже тысячелетий, Т. 2, Санкт-Петербург.

Трофимова Г.Н., 2004, Языковой вкус Интернет-эпохи в России: Фун¬кционирование русского языка в Интернете: концептуально-сущностные доминанты. Дисс. докт. филолог, наук. Москва.

Published
2021-02-04

Cited by

Karpova, T. B. . (2021). Èpatažnostʹ kak stilevaâ dominanta setevyh SMI. Stylistyka, 18, 263–272. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3556

Authors

Tat’âna B. Karpova 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2009 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.