Dynamics of Meanings in Poetica! Texts in the Perspective of Phenomenological and Cognitive Hypothesis of
Joanna Ślósarska
Abstract
The paper presents a comparative view of the hypothesis of relatively isolated systems on the phenomenological (R. Ingarden) and cognitive (especially R. Langacker, G. La[1]koff, and M. Turner) backgrounds. Main arguments of the paper are as follows: I) the hy[1]pothesis of relatively isolated systems, which has as its component the concept of hetero[1]nomous objects, constitutes a research paradigm that is common to phenomenology and cognitivism; this paradigm is specially distinct in the research of the domains oflinguisti[1]cs and poetics, which assumes ontological and cognitive context as essential for interpre[1]tation of linguistic expressions; 2) complete understanding of poetica! texts involves most of all the research of linguistic representation of the values in relation to cognitive and vi[1]tal field of the utterance and the auctorial subjects; 3) anisotropy of the cognitive field, created in poetica( texts, constitutes a component of dynamie interaction of the " I-in-the-world" and "1-against-the-world" systems, as well as of modelling them.
component of dynamie interaction of the " I-in-the-world" and "1-against-the-world" systems, as well as of modelling them.
References
Arin E., 1983, Die Semiotische Katastrophe, „Semiosis” 8, 2 (30), 21-31.
Google Scholar
Bobryk J., 1992, Niektóre problemy epistemologiczne w badaniach cognitive science. Pogranicza epistemologii, pod red. J. Niżnika, Warszawa, s. 60-78.
Google Scholar
Bobryk J., 1996, Akty Świadomości i procesy poznawcze, "Monogrąfie Fundacji Na Rzecz Nauki Polskiej», Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Falkowski A., 1990, Relacja podobieństwa w procesach poznawczych. Ekologiczne i informacyjne podejście w psychologii, Lublin.
Google Scholar
Ingarden R., 1947, Szkice z filozofii literatury, Łódź. Ingarden R., 1957, Studia z estetyki, t. l, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Ingarden R., 1958, Studia z estetyki, t. 2, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Ingarden R., 1970, Studia z estetyki, t. 3, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Ingarden R., 1981 , Spór o istnienie świata, t. 3: O strukturze przyczynowej realnego świata, przygot. i partie tekstu z jęz. niem. przetł. D. Gierulanka, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Ingarden R., 1987a, Spór o istnienie świata, t. l, Ontologia egzystencjalna, Przygot. i partie tekstu z jęz. niem. przetł. D. Gierulanka, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Ingarden R., 1987b, Spór o istnienie šwiata, t. 2: Ontologiaformalna, cz. 2: Swiat i šwiadomo", przygot. i partie tekstu z jez niem. przetl. D. Gierulanka, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Ingarden R., 1988, O dziele literackim; przel. M. Turowicz, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
LakoffG., Turner M., 1989, More than cool reason: afield guide to poetic metaphor, Chicago and London.
Google Scholar
Langacker R. W., 1987, Foundations ofgenerative grammar. Vol. I . Theoretical prerequisities, Stanford, CA.
Google Scholar
Langacker R. W., 1991, Foundations ofgenerative grammar- Vol. 2. Descriptive application, Stanford, CA.
Google Scholar
Langacker R. W., 1995, Wyklady z gramatyki kognitywnej, przeld. zbior. pod red. H. Kardeli, Lublin.
Google Scholar
Lozowski R, 1994, Czym jest prototyp w semantyce diachronicznej. — Podstawy gramatyki kognitywnej, pod red. H. Kardeli, Warszawa, s. 243-254.
Google Scholar
Nerlich B., 1989, Elements for an integral theory oflanguage change, „Journal of Literary Studies. An International Review" XIII, 3, s. 163-186.
Google Scholar
Rosch E., 1978, Principles of categorization. — Cognition and categorization, ed. by E. Rosch, B. L. Loyd, Hillsdale, NY.
Google Scholar
Różewicz T., 1967, Wiersze i poematy, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Wildgen W., 1987, Dynamic and ontological foundation for a theory of the lexicon. Process linguistics: exploring the processual aspects of language use and the methods of their description, «Linguistische Arbeiten», ed. by T. T. Ballmer and W. Wildgen, Tübingen, s. 80-127.
Google Scholar
Authors
Joanna ŚlósarskaStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
