Script Oppositions and Humorous Tагgets: Promoting Values and Constructing Identities via Humor in Greek Conversational Data

Argiris Archakis; Villy Tsakona

Opublikowane: 2006-12-30

Tom 15 (2006)

Script Oppositions and Humorous Tагgets: Promoting Values and Constructing Identities via Humor in Greek Conversational Data

Argiris Archakis , Villy Tsakona

Abstrakt

Recent pragmatic research focuses on the issue of identity construction via humor. In this paper, we intend to investigate how could the General Theory of Verbal Humor (in Attardo 2001, henceforth GTVH) contribute to the analysis of humor as a means of iden[1]tity construction. Among the six knowledge resources proposed by the GTVH we focus on target and script opposition. The first one helps us identify whose behavior our young informants consider incongruous and, at the same time, worth laughing at. The second one reveals the specific (and often implicit) norms ard values shared by conversationalists. We illustrate our points u mg Greek conversational narratives coming from same-gen[1]der groups of young Greek males and females. We show that, in our data, conversationa[1]lists select targets either outside or inside their group. Special emphasis is given to sel[1]f-targeting humor (henceforth STH) and its function as a discourse strategy used for iden[1]tity construction. Previous research on this kind of humor has revealed that STH can be interpreted as an index of either lack or presence of self-confidence and self-esteem. Our data show that, by using STH, our interlocutors indirectly point to a positive self-image. In all cases, the target of humor reinforces the existing bonds among group members, while bringing the evaluative dimension of humor to the surface and revealing the group values. Finally, our analysis brings an interesting pragmatic difference to the surface. This difference is related to the effect of humor on the identities constructed: through humor directed at other people’s behavior (in the cases of out- and in-group targets), the speaker eventually de-legitimizes those others, while, through self-targeting humor, the speaker aims at legitimizing him/herself and his/her own actions.

Pobierz pliki

pdf (English)

Zasady cytowania

Archakis, A., & Tsakona, V. (2006). Script Oppositions and Humorous Tагgets: Promoting Values and Constructing Identities via Humor in Greek Conversational Data. Stylistyka, 15, 119–134. Pobrano z https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3885

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Antonopoulou E. & Sinanou M., 2003: “Conversational dynamics of humour: the tele phone game in Gieek”. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (5), 741-769.
Google Scholar

Archaxis A. & Tsakona V., 2u04: “Linguistic Humor as a Means ofldentity Construction: Analysis of Data from Young Male and Female Inxeractions”. In the proceedings of the 6Ш International Conference of Greek Linguistics, 18-21 September 2003. Ret hymno: Linguistics Lab, University of Crete (). [in Greek]
Google Scholar

Archakis A. & Tsakona V., 2005: “Analyzing conversational data in GTVH terms: A new approach to the issue of identity construcxion via humor”. Humor 18 (1), 41-68.
Google Scholar

Attardo S., 2001: Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Google Scholar

Brown P. & Levinson S.( 1987: Politeness: Some Universal in Language Usage. Cam bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Bonaiuto M., Castellana E. & Picrro A., 2003: “Arguing and laughing: The use of humor to negotiate in group discussions”. Humor 16 (2), 183-223.
Google Scholar

Boxer D. & Cortes-Conde F., 1997: “From Bonding to Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display”. Journal of Pragmatics 27 (3), 275-294.
Google Scholar

Davis M., 1993: What's So Funny? The Comic Conception of Culture and Society. Chica go: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

De Fina A., 2003: Identity in Narrative. A Study of Immigrant Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Duszak A. (ed.), 2002: Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 377-400.
Google Scholar

Glenn P., 2003: Laughter in Intel action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Hay J., 2001: “The Pragmatics of Humor Support”. Humor 14 (1), 55-82.
Google Scholar

Holmes J., 2000: “Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace”. Discourse Studies 2 (2), 159-185.
Google Scholar

Holmes J. & Marra M., 2002a: “Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends”. Humor 15 (1), 65-87.
Google Scholar

Holmes J. & Marra M., 2002b: “Humour as a discursive boundary marker in social inte raction”. In Duszak A. (ed.), Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 377-400.
Google Scholar

Kotthoff H., 20u0: “Gender and Joking: On the Complexities of Women’s Image Politics in Humorous Narratives”. Journal o f Pragmatics 32 (1), 55-80.
Google Scholar

La Fave L., Haddad J. & Maesen W, 1996: “Sup< rionty, Enhanced Self-Esteem, and Per ceived Incongruity Humour Theory”. In Chapman A. & Foot H. (eds.), Humor and Laughter. Theory, Research and Applications. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Tran saction Publishers, 63-91.
Google Scholar

Lampert M. & Ervin-Tripp S., 1998: “Exploring paradigms: fhe study of gender and sense of humor near the end of the 20th century”. In RUCH W. (ed.), The Sense of Hu mor. Explorations of a Personality Characteristic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 231-270.
Google Scholar

Lytra V., 2006 forthcoming: “Teasing in Contact Encounters: Frames, Participant Potsitions and Responses”. Multilingua 25 (4).
Google Scholar

McGhee R, 1979: Humor. Its Origin and Development. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Google Scholar

Mulkay M., 1988: On Humor. Its Nature and Its Place in Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

NorrickN., 1993: Conversational Joking Humor in Everydav Talk Bloomington: India na University Press.
Google Scholar

Norrick N., 1994: “Involvement and Joking in Conversation” Journal of Pragmatics 22 (3/4), 409-430.
Google Scholar

Norrick N., 2004: “Humor, tellability, and conarration in conversational storytelling”. Text 24 (1), 79-111.
Google Scholar

Pike K., 1967: Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of Human Behaviour. The Hague: Mouton.
Google Scholar

Priego-Valverde B., 2004: “Humor and ‘double-bind’: responding to self-disparagmg hu mor in everyday speech”. Paper presented in the 16th Conference of the Internatio nal Society for Humor Studies, 14-18 June 2004, Dijon, Prance.
Google Scholar

PurdieS., 1993: Comedy. The Mastery of Discourse. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Google Scholar

Raskin V., 1985: Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Google Scholar

Ross A., 1998: The Language of Humour. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Sarbin T. Sc Kitsuse J., 1994: Constructing the Social. London: Sage Publications
Google Scholar

Schifffin D., 1996: “Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic construction of identity”. Language in Society 25 (2), 167-203.
Google Scholar

Sifianou M., 2001: Politeness phenomena in England and Greece. A cross-cultural perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Taylor T., & Cameron D. 1987: Analysing Conversation: Rules and Units in the Structure of Talk. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Google Scholar

Tracy S., Myers K. & Scott C., 2002: “Humor as Organizational Sensemaking A Groun ded Multisite Analysis”. Paper presented at the 2002 National Communication As sociation convention, New Orleans.
Google Scholar

Tsakona V., 2003: “Jab lines in narrative jokes”. Humor 16 (3), 315-329.
Google Scholar

Tsakona V., 2004: “Humor in Written Narratives: A Linguistic Analysis”. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Athens, [in Greek]
Google Scholar

Tzanne A., 2001: ‘“What you’re saying sounds very nice and I am delighted to hear it’. Some considerations on the functions of presenter-initiated simultaneous speech in Greek panel discussions”. In Bayraktaroglu A. & Sifianou M. (eds.), Linguistic po liteness. The case of Greece and Turkey. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benja mins Publishing Company, 271-306.
Google Scholar

van Dijk T., 1998: Ideology: An interdisciplinary approach. London: Sage. Widdicombe S. 1998: “Identity as an analysts’ and a participants’ resource” In Antaki C. & Widdicombe S. (eds.), Identities in talk. London: Sage, 191-206.
Google Scholar

Zajdman A., 1995: “Humorous Face-threatening Acts: Humor as Strategy”. Journal of Pragmatics 23, 325-339
Google Scholar