The Folklore Epithets in В. Oliynyk's Poetry
Galina Klìŝun
Âroslav Čornenʹkij
Abstract
The fundamental bulk of folklore epithets in B.Oliynyk’s poetry - are the constant epithets in semantic-emotional author’s interpretation, which functionate in poetry-parables and connected with historical themes, in intimate lyric poetry, and seldom in social-political and philosophical lyrics. In the basis of renovation figurativeness of folklore epithets in B.Oliynyk’s works are their combination with other lexical units; combination range is very wide: from changing ofthe traditional words in set expressions to close to sense or associatively connected with it-to join the folk-lore epithet with antonym of the main word of the traditional wordcombination. In combination they form metaphorical and symbolic meanings. The context is promoted to figurativeness renovation where the traditional folklore epithets are realizes in „unusual conditions”. In B.Oliynyk’s poetry folk-lore epithets are combinated in integral whole with other folk-lore elements-metaphors, comparisons and other popular poetry sym[1]bols, which favourthe formation ofthe corresponding sentiments ofthe reader.
Authors
Galina KlìŝunAuthors
Âroslav ČornenʹkijStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Âroslav Čornenʹkij, The Artistic Comparisons as Stylistic Elements of V. Stephanik's Novel , Stylistyka: Vol. 7 (1998): Slavic Stylistics
