Funkcionalʹno-stilevaâ specifika folʹklornogo teksta v acpekte èkstralingvističeskoj obuslovlennosti

Marina A. Vengranovič




Abstract

The article considers the problem of defining the stylistic peculiarities of the folklore text. As criteria for objective investigation of the problem the author suggests using the
functional approach, presupposing the study of any kind oftext in two inseparable aspects - textual and extralinguistic. In accordance with this approach the author distinguishes
the following basie extralinguistic factors revealed in the folklore text: folklore thinking, character of the folklore communication and collective authorship, which together determine
specific character of the folklore communicative act participants - speech subject and addressee. The author focuses on the predominating features of the folklore thinking,
which deterrnine the unity of the generalizing method in folklore w ithin which complex semantic structure of the folklore word is organized as well as a specific type of depiction
- literary-generalizing. Influence of the folklore communication is perfom1ed in natura! ways and can be characterized by continuity and synchronizing the acts of performance
and perception; heterogenie character, activity of both participants. The consequences of it are examined by the author as literary syncretism of the folklore text, the evidence of the autorcommunicational text features, hypertext structure as well as peculiarities of realizing the phenomena of subject and address. Analyzing extralinguistic factors the author
comes to conclusion of granting the folklore speech the status of stylistic variety of literary speech with its own specific features.

Keywords:

folklore text, functional stylistic aspect, extralinguistic factors, folklore thinking, folklore communication, collective authorship, category of subject and address, belles-lettres speech

^доньева C.E., 2000, Сказочный текст u традиционно культура, Санкт- Петербург.

Артеменко E.E., 1977, Синтаксический! строй русской народної! лирической песни в аспекте ее художественной организации, Воронеж.

Еычины Севера, 1951, т. I, 2, Москва-Ленинград.

Гусев B.E., 1978, O специфике воспрития фольклора (K проблеме синестезии в искусстве). - Творческий процесс и художественное воспритие, Ленинград.

Жши-были... Русско обрядовая поэзо, 1998, Санкт-Петербург.

Исторические песни XVII в, 1966, Москва-Ленинград.

Колесов В.В., 1991, Семантический синкретизм как категория языка, "Вестник Ленинградского университета”, сер. 2, вып. 2 (№9).

Кравцов Н.И., 1972, Проблемы славянского фольклора, Москва.

Лопатин H.M., Прокунин В.П., 1956, Русские народные лирические песни, Москва.

Лотман Ю.М., 1999, Внутри мысощгх миров. Человек - текст - семиосфера - исторт, Москва.

Мадьцев Г.И., 198 1, Традиционные формулы русской необрядовой лирики. (K изучению эстетики устнопоэтического канона).- Русский фольклор. Поэтика русского фольклора, XXI, Ленинград.

Мильков B.B., 1988, Синкретизм в древнерусской мысли. - Отечественная общественна мысль эпохи среднебекобья (историко-фтософские мысли), Киев.

Оссовецкий H.A., 1975, О языке русского традиционного фольклора.- Вопросы язьїкознанш, №5, Москва.

Путилов E.H., I 975, Историко-фолькчорный процесс и эстетика фольклора.- Проблемы фольклора, Москва.

Собрание народных песен П.В.Киреееского, 1986, Тула.

Толстой H.H., 1995, Язык и народны культура. Очерки по славянской мифологии и этнолингвистике, Москва.

Хроленко A.T., I 991, Сеоеобразие фольклорного слоеа,- Русский фольклор. Проблемы текстологии фольклора, XXVI , Ленинград.

Published
2021-05-29

Cited by

Vengranovič, M. A. (2021). Funkcionalʹno-stilevaâ specifika folʹklornogo teksta v acpekte èkstralingvističeskoj obuslovlennosti. Stylistyka, 14, 601–614. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/4065

Authors

Marina A. Vengranovič 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2005 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.