О definicjach stylu
ТERESA SKUBALANКA
Abstract
1n the article the author gives а critical survey of different definitions of language style, beginning from the qualification of style as а manner of speaking, which was already known in antiquity. That defmition is still in use nowadays. Individual aspects of style were considered Ьу the Romanticists, and later Ьу the German Neoidealists. Bally and Croce linked style with expression, and that definition is still valid as well. Nevertheless, contemporary stylistics originates, generally speaking, from the ideas of the Russian formalists, and the concept of function which is of primary importance in its theory, stems from the views of the members of the Prague Linguistic Circle. Тhе author pays much attention to the discussion of Polish works in stylistics, which are always linked with contemporary trends in linguistics, from Kurylowicz, Budzyk, Mayenowa, Kurkowska and Skorupka to Gajda and Wilkon. The defmitions of style one could meet after the Second World War mirrored the probems discussed in various scientific schools, either linked with structuralism in its various forms, or inspired Ьу pragmatics, axiology, information theory and statistics, or axiology, semiotics and new types of cognitivism. Тhе author considers the concept of style to bе one of the universals of language, to Ьelong always to the plane of its sign realisation and to contain in itself the thought of the way the system is realised in usage depending on the function perfoпned. In her opinion the definitions of style foпnulated up to now may Ье understood, in а sense,
to convey no contradiction, as they reflect the complex character of the phenomenon.
References
Bartminski J., 1990, Folklor - język - poetyka, Wrocław.
Boguslawski А., 1993 "Znaczenie" а "językowa konwencja poznawcza", О definicjach i definiowaniu, red. J. Bartminski, R. Tokarski, Lubin.
Borowski Н. 1992, Wartość jako przeżycie. Wprowadzenie do aksjologii, Lublin.
Budzyk К., 1937, Z zagadnien stylistyki. Prace ofiarowane К. W6ycickiemu, Wilno.
Budzyk К., 1946, Zarys dziejów stylistyki teoretycznej w Polsce. Stylistyka teoretyczna w Polsce, pod red. К. Budzyka, Warszawa.
Т. Dobrzynska, 1992, Badania struktury tekstu - nowe i;r6dlo inspiracji stylistyki, ,,Stylistyka" 1.
Enkvist N.E., 1946, Оп defining style. -Enkvist N.E., Spencer J., Gregory MJ., Linguistics and Style, Oxford.
Gajda S., 1982, Podstawy badan stylistycznych nad językiem naukowym, Wrocław.
Gajda S., 1988, Styl indywidualny а wsp6lczesna stylistyka. -Z polskich studi6w slawistycznych, seria VП, Warszawa.
Gajda S., 1991, Stan wsp6lczesnej stylistyki а synteza stylistyczna. - Synteza w stylistyce słowiańskiej, Opole.
Gajda S., 1992, Dylematy stylistyka. - Systematyzacja роjęć w stylistyce. Materiały z konferencji z 24-26 IX 1991 r., red. naukowa S. Gajda, Opole.
Górski К., 1946, Poezja jako wyraz. Próba teorii poezji, Toruń.
Grzegorczykowa R., 1992, Kognitywne ийсiе znaczenia а рrоЫет realizmu kognitywnego. -,,Język а kultura", t. 8.
Guiraud Р., 1971, La semiologie, Paris.
Havranek В., 1932, Ukoly spisovneho jazyka а jeho kultura. - Spisowna cestina а jazykovd kultura, red. В. HavrAnek, М. Weingart, Praha.
Jakobson R., 1960, Poetyka w swietle językoznawstwa, ,,Pamiętnić Literacki", z. 2.
Jelinek М., 1992, ProЫematika definice pojmu "styl" ,,Stylistyka", 1.
Językowy obraz świata, 1990, red. J. Bartmiński, Lublin.
Kardela Н., 1992, Gramatyka kognitywna jako globalna teoria йzyka. - ,,Język а kultura", t. 8: Podstawy metodologiczne semantyki wsp6lczesnej, red. J. Nowakowska-Kempny, Wroclaw.
Кlemensiewicz Z., 1961, Zagadnienia i zalożenia historii języka polskiego. - W kręgu języka literackiego i artystycznego, Warszawa.
Korzyk К., 1992, Semantyka kognitywna - рrоЫету i metody. (Kilka uwag natury filozoficznej). - ,,Jęęyk а kultura", t. 8.
Kurkowska Н., Skorupka S., 1959, Stylistyka polska. Zarys, wyd. 1, Warszawa 1959.
Kurylowicz J., 1947, Język poetycki ze stanowiska lingwistycznego, ,,Sprawozdania Wrocl. T.N", 11 [przedruk w: Studia językoznawcze, Warszawa 1987].
Literatura polska. Przewodnik encyklopedyczny, 1985, t. 2, N-Z, Warszawa.
Markiewicz Н., 1970, Gl6wne рrоЫету wiedzy о literaturze; wyd. 3, przejrzane i uzupełnione, Кraków.
Marouzeau J., 1959, Nature, degres et qualite de l' expression stylistique. - Stil - und Form probeme in der Literatur. Vortrage des VII. Kongresses der Internationalen Vereinigung ftJ,r moderne Sprachen und Literaturen in Heidelberg, Heide lberg. Mayenowa M.R., 1966, Moiliwosci i niebelzpieczenstwa metod matematycznych w poetyce. - Poetyka i matematyka, red. M.R. Мayenowa, Warszawa.
Mayenowa M.R., 1965, Analiza doktryny stylistycznej Praskiego Kola. Praska szkoła strukturalna w latach 1926-1948. ПуЬ6r material6w, Warszawa.
Mayenowa M.R., 1976, Teoria tekstu а tradycyjne zagadnienia poetyki. - Рrоbеmу teorii literatury, seria 2, Wrocław.
Mayenowa M.R., 1979, Poetyka teoretyczna. Zagadnienia języka, wyd. 2 uzup. i popr., Wrocław.
Mazur J., 1990, Styl i tekst w aspekcie pragmatycznym. Z zagadnień teoretyczno-metodologicznych, ,,Socjolingwistyka" IX.
Мiko F., 1970, Text а styl, Bratisłava.
Morris Ch., 1946, Sign, Language and Behavior, New York [w j
Authors
ТERESA SKUBALANКAStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
