Функционирование вопросов в научнои рецензии (те проблеме диалогизации письменной речи)

ЛИДИЯ В. КРАСИЛЬНИКОВА




Abstract

.L' Auteur de cet article considere l'avis critique comme une sorte de replique dans un dialogue scientifique ecrit. D'ailleurs, le critique peut egalemeнt s'adresser au lecteur, ainsi que poser des questions ou faire des suggestions а l'auteur de l'ouvrage analyse.
L'article critique possede donc une structure communicative toute particuliere assez complexe. L'inteпogation dans l'article critique peut, premierement, remplir sa fonction directe, c'est-a-dire inteпogative (sans replique immediate de l'opposant). Deuxiemement, elle
peut presenter uн procede puor dialoguer, се qui s 'exprime surtout dans les raisonnements du critique (autocommuнication) ou lors de l'expose des proЫemes du texte analyse. Et troisiemement, l'inteпogation peut etre employee а des fins stylistiques pour organiser
le texte. Les coнstructions inteпogatives ont egalement des significations supplementaires, appreciatives ou modales.


Арутюнова Н.Д., 1970, Некоторые типы диалогических рейkций и "почему"- репшки в русском языке, ,,Филологические науки", № 3.

Кириченко И.В., 1990, Функционирование средств экспрессивного синтаксиса в тексто вой структуре на учно-популярного про изведен ияkипология текста в функционально-сти;шстическом аспекте, Пермь.

Милевская Т.Е., 1985, Средства выражения речевого конmй1Сmа в русском язы ке (вопросно-о тве тный к о мплекс в н а учно-по пулярных произведе) АКД, Ленинград.

Кожина М.Н., 1986, О диалогичности письменной научной речи. Учебноеb пособие по спецкурсу, Пермь.

Светане С.В., 1985, О диалогизации монолога, ,,Филогические науки" № 4.

Published
2021-07-22

Cited by

КРАСИЛЬНИКОВА, Л. В. (2021). Функционирование вопросов в научнои рецензии (те проблеме диалогизации письменной речи). Stylistyka, 2, 231–242. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/4456

Authors

ЛИДИЯ В. КРАСИЛЬНИКОВА 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.