On the emotionality of discourse markers in spontaneous spoken communication
Abstract
The characteristics of the so-called discourse markers play an important role in the stylistic analysis of spontaneous spoken communication. The term discourse markers refers to the group of synsemantic words (or their collocations) that convey primarily pragmatic information. When describing discourse markers, their polyfunctionality is always emphasized. Discourse markers can perform a variety of (textual and interaction-related) functions, depending on the context, their structural position in the utterance, and especially their sound modifications. The article is based on the analysis of discourse markers in terms of their expressive and emotional functions. The use of discourse markers to express the speaker’s emotional attitudes is connected with three processes: sound modification, multiplication (repetition), and cumulation (formation of multiwords markers). The main source of language material for the research was the corpus of contemporary spoken Czech ORAL v1.
Keywords:
discourse marker, language function, emotional function, spoken Czech, dialogue analysis, Czech National CorpusReferences
Zdroje
Google Scholar
Kopřivová M., Lukeš D., Komrsková Z., Poukarová P., Waclawičová M., Benešová L., Křen M.: ORAL: korpus neformální mluvené češtiny, verze 1 z 2.6.2017. Ústav českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha 2017. Dostupný z WWW: http://www.korpus.cz.
Google Scholar
Literatura
Google Scholar
Čermák F., 2008, Partikule, jejich syntagmatika a kumulace v mluvené češtině. –Čeština v mluveném korpusu, red. M. Kopřivová, M. Waclawičová, Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, s. 63–74.
Google Scholar
Čermáková A., Jílková L., Komrsková Z., Kopřivová M., Poukarová P., 2019, Dis kurzní markery. – Syntax mluvené češtiny, red. J. Hoffmannová, J. Homoláč, K. Mrázková, Praha: Academia, s. 244–351.
Google Scholar
Grepl M., 1967, Emocionálně motivované aktualizace v syntaktické struktuře výpovědi, Brno: Univerzita J. E. Purkyně.
Google Scholar
Hoffmannová J., Müllerová O., Zeman J., 1999, Konverzace v češtině při rodinných a přátelských návštěvách, Praha: TRIZONIA.
Google Scholar
Chamonikolasová K., 2010, Diskurzní částice v českém a anglickém dialogu. –Integrace v jazycích – jazyky v integraci, M. Krčmová a kol., Praha: NLN, s. 99–110.
Google Scholar
Kačala J., 2012, K podstate vety. Syntetický pohľad, Martin: Vydavateľstvo Matice slovenskej.
Google Scholar
Müllerová O., 2005, Opakování jako jeden z rysů výstavby mluvených textů. – Aktu álne otázky súčasnej syntaxe, red. M. Šimková, Bratislava: Veda, s. 139–149.
Google Scholar
Stivers T., 2004, „No no no“ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interac tion, „Human Communication Research“, 30, č. 2, s. 260–293.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00733.x
Google Scholar
Authors
Denisa KnobováAuthors
Sára PodojilováStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
