Rozmowa pisana. Parametry formalne i pragmatyczne wypowiedzi na forach dyskusyjnych w Internecie
Abstract
The aim of the article is to describe formal exponents of discourse on the Internet forum, which is an interactive discourse created in writing, and to define the specificity of this form of communication from a pragmatic perspective. The analysis of the examples taken from Polish discussion fora focuses on three main issues, i.e., the stylistic form of speech (i.e., the method of translating the oral style into a written form), the organisation of the discussion structure (the system of replies, the mode, the order of speaking), as well as the availability of relevant contextual data and contact with the interlocutor. As shown by the analysis, the above-mentioned parameters of a network discussion show significant differences as compared with those related to direct conversation, and this discrepancy generates equally important pragmatic consequences. This leads to the conclusion that the exchange of opinions on an online forum is not only a transfer of a typical face-to-face interaction into a virtual communication space, but also is a separate form of a polylogue combining the features of an oral conversation and a written style in terms of the possibilities offered by both modes and related restrictions.
Keywords:
discussion, Internet forum, formal and pragmatics parameters, spoken style, written styleReferences
Béguelin M.-J., 2002, Clause, période ou autre ? La phrase graphique et la questiondes niveaux d’analyse, „Verbum”, XXIV, 1–2, s. 85–107.
Google Scholar
Berrendonner A., 1993, Périodes. – La temporalité du discours, red. H. Parret, L ouvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, s. 47–61.
Google Scholar
Berrendonner A., 2003, Éléments pour une macro-syntaxe : actions communicatives, types de clauses, structures périodiques. – Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique. L’analyse linguistique de l’oral, red. A. Scarano, Roma: Bulzoni, s. 93–110.
Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste C., 2000, Approches de la langue parlée en français, Paris: Ophrys.
Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste C., Jeanjean C. (red.), 1987, Le Français parlé : transcription et édition, Paris: Didier.
Google Scholar
Colin J.-Y., Mourlhon-Dallies F., 2004, Du courrier des lecteurs aux forums de discussion sur l’internet : retour sur la notion de genre, „Les Carnets du Cediscor”, 8, s. 113–140, https://journals.openedition.org/cediscor/707 (dostęp: 10.06.2022).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/cediscor.707
Google Scholar
Goffman E., 1981, Forms of Talk, Philadelphie: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar
Golus B., 2004, Fenomen rozmów internetowych i ich języka. – Dialog a nowe media, red. M. Kita, J. Grzenia, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, s. 33–41.
Google Scholar
Groupe De Fribourg, 2012, Grammaire de la période, Bern: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Grzenia J., 2006, Komunikacja językowa w internecie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar
Jakobson R., 1963, Essais de linguistique générale, Paris: Minuit.
Google Scholar
Karwatowska M., Jarosz B., 2013, Forum internetowe, czyli (cyber)komunikacja o ograniczonym zasięgu społecznym, „Polonica”, XXXIII, s. 109–121.
Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni C., 1990, 1992, 1994, Les Interactions verbales, 3 tomy, Paris: Armand Colin.
Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni C., 2000, L’Analyse des interactions verbales : la notion de négociation conversationnelle. Défense et illustration, „Lalies”, 20, s. 63–141.
Google Scholar
Kita M., 2004, Tekstowy status modułu rozmowy. – Gatunki mowy i ich ewolucja, t. 2, red. D. Ostaszewska, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, s. 405–413.
Google Scholar
Kita M., Grzenia J. (red.), 2004, Dialog a nowe media, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, http://www.sbc.org.pl/Content/40285/dialog_a : 10.06.2022).
Google Scholar
Labocha J., 2012, Pragmatyczne mechanizmy składni języka mówionego, „Slavia Occidentalis”, 69, s. 139–145, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/154445013.pdf (dostęp: 10.06.2022).
Google Scholar
Łukaszewicz-Olczyk A., 2008, Strategie marketingowe w dyskursie na forum internetowym. – Język w marketingu, red. K. Michalewski, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, s. 214–222.
Google Scholar
Marcoccia M., 2004, L’analyse conversationnelle des forums de discussion : questionnements méthodologiques, „Les Carnets du Cediscor”, 8, s. 23–37, https:// journals.openedition.org/cediscor/220 (dostęp: 10.06.2022).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/cediscor.220
Google Scholar
Moeschler J., 1989, La modélisation du dialogue, Paris: Hermès.
Google Scholar
Münchow von P., 2004, Le discours rapporté dans un forum de discussion sur l’Internet, „Les Carnets du Cediscor”, 8, s. 91–112, https://journals.openedition.org/ cediscor/702 (dostęp: 10.06.2022).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/cediscor.702
Google Scholar
Naruszewicz-Duchlińska A., 2014, Nowe media a nowe gatunki – wstępna charakterystyka genologiczna internetowego forum dyskusyjnego, „Postscriptum Polonistyczne”, 2, s. 27–38, http://uwm.edu.pl/polonistyka/pliki/article/125/fora.pdf (dostęp: 10.06.2022).
Google Scholar
Roulet E. i in., 1987, L’articulation du discours en français contemporain, Berne-Paris: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Taras B., 2004, Anonim w Internecie, czyli o komunikacji incognito. – Dialog a nowe media, red. M. Kita, J. Grzenia, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, s. 42–51.
Google Scholar
Vion R., 1992, La communication verbale. Analyse des interactions, Paris: Hachette.
Google Scholar
Warchala J., 1991, Dialog potoczny a tekst, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar
Warchala J., 2003, Kategoria potoczności w języku, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar
Wilkoń A., 2000, Typologia odmian językowych współczesnej polszczyzny, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar
Wołowska K., 2015, Le facteur discursif dans l’analyse sémantique de l’interprétation. – Linguistique du discours : de l’intra- à l’interphrastique, red. T. Muryn, S. Mejri, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, s. 205–217.
Google Scholar
Wołowska K., 2020, Perturbation du cadre temporel et participatif de l’interaction sur les forums de discussion en ligne, „Roczniki Humanistyczne”, z. 5, t. 68, s. 193–203, https://ojs.tnkul.pl/index.php/rh/article/view/12847/12663 (dostęp: 10.06.2022).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh20685-13
Google Scholar
Wyrwas K., 2004, Kilka uwag o dyskusji na forum internetowym. – Dialog a nowe media, red. M. Kita, J. Grzenia, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, s. 52–72.
Google Scholar
Żydek-Bednarczuk U., 1994, Struktura tekstu rozmowy potocznej, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar
Żydek-Bednarczuk U., 2004, Tekst w Internecie i jego wyznaczniki. – Dialog a nowe media, red. M. Kita, J. Grzenia, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, s. 11–21.
Google Scholar
Statistics
Downloads
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
