The Motif of Sacrifice in Surrogacy
Roman Globokar
Theologische Fakultät der Universität Ljubljanahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-497X
Abstract
The regulation of surrogacy varies between different countries. There is a trend towards greater liberalization on the global level. Ethical evaluation creates a basic dilemma: Is surrogacy a superior form of solidarity between people or the instrumentalization of a woman’s body, being contrary to the fundamental dignity of every human person? How does surrogacy affect people involved in the process and what do decades of experience with surrogacy tell us about its effect on human beings? Is there an ideal form of surrogacy where reproductive parties themselves describe the relationship as satisfactory, fair, and just, and where the well-being of all involved parties is equally considered?
In this article, we will look at the unsuccessful initiative to regulate at least the issue of altruistic surrogacy in the Council of Europe countries in 2016. The aspect of sacrifice of the surrogate mother for the well-being of the couple who wants a child is often raised. However, the mere altruistic intention to help another does not make an act ethically acceptable. The paper also draws attention to several ethical reservations regarding surrogacy. The most controversial issue is the instrumentalization of a woman’s body. Especially in poor countries, the victims of surrogacy are very badly informed about the procedure, while their freedom and autonomy are significantly infringed. A child born to a surrogate mother can also be a victim of various interests of intended parents, different corporations and the woman who gave birth to him/her. The paper outlines the vulnerability of the intended parents, the surrogate mother, and above all the child, who is often forgotten in the debates. Additionally, it also touches upon the frequently neglected ethical perspective of personal desire, sacrifice, and victimization. When is it ethically acceptable, from the point of the altruistic action recipient, to expect and accept altruistic actions? When do subjective expectations and desires cross the boundary that divides means of overcoming health limitations from mere selfishness? Last but not least, it also questions when the intent of helping others transforms from an ethically acceptable sacrifice to ethically unacceptable victimization.
Schlagworte:
surrogacy, altruism, sacrifice, human dignity, instrumentalizationLiteraturhinweise
Bagan-Kurluta K., 2017. “Wombs for Rent, Outsoursed Pregnancies, Baby Farms – Ethics and Surrogate Motherhood”. Progress in Health Sciences 7 (1): 193–198.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.1883
Google Scholar
Barba-Müller Erika, Craddock Sinéad, Carmona Susanna, Hoekzema Elseline. 2018. “Brain plasticity in pregnancy and the postpartum period: links to maternal caregiving and mental health”. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 22 (2): 289–299.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0889-z
Google Scholar
Büchler Andrea, Bleisch Barbara. 2014. “Leihmutterschaft – ein respektables Unterfangen?” Neue Züricher Zeitung 21–22.
Google Scholar
De Sutter Petra. 2016. Children’s rights related to surrogacy. Report of the Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development, Council of Europe. https://pace.coe.int/pdf/a78e4d8b4e90762e7126957315e97dd7d2c62b19306e6092dfeecc78570f00bf/doc.%2014140.pdf (23.09.2016).
Google Scholar
Edelmann Robert J. 2004. “Surrogacy: the psychological issues”. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 22 (2): 123–136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0264683042000205981
Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2011. New EU policy framework to fight violence against women. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0127_EN.html (05.04.2011).
Google Scholar
Feraci Ornella. 2015. “Maternità surrogata conclusa all’estero e Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo: riflessioni a margine della sentenza Paradiso e Campanelli c. Italia”. Cuadernos de derecho transnacional 7 (2): 420–439.
Google Scholar
Ghods Ahad J., Mahdavi Mitra. 2007. “Organ transplantation in Iran”. Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation 18 (4): 648–655.
Google Scholar
Gunnarsson Payne Jenny, Korolczuk Elzbieta, Mezinska Signe. 2020. “Surrogacy relationships: a critical interpretative review”. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 125 (2): 183–191.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1725935
Google Scholar
Guntram Lisa, Jane Williams Nicola. 2018. “Positioning uterus transplantation as a ‘more ethical’ alternative to surrogacy: Exploring symmetries between uterus transplantation and surrogacy through analysis of a Swedish government white paper”. Bioethics 32 (8): 509–518.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12469
Google Scholar
Hallich Oliver. 2017. “Sperm Donation and the Right to Privacy”. The New Bioethics 23 (2): 107–120.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2017.1355083
Google Scholar
Kuwert Philipp, Glaesmer Heide, Eichhorn Svenja, Grundke Elena, Pietrzak Robert H., Freyberger Harald J., Klauer Thomas. 2014. “Long-Term Effects of Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Compared with Non-Sexual War Trauma in Female World War II Survivors: A Matched Pairs Study”. Archives of sexual behavior 43 (6): 1059–1064.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0272-8
Google Scholar
Lamba Nishtha, Jadva Vasanti, Kadam Kaushal, Golombok Susan. 2018. “The psychological well-being and prenatal bonding of gestational surrogates”. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 33 (4): 646–653.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey048
Google Scholar
Martínez-García Magdalena, Paternina-Die María, Desco Manuel, Vilarroya Oscar, Carmona Susanna. 2021. “Characterizing the Brain Structural Adaptations Across the Motherhood Transition”. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health 2 (10):742775–742775.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.742775
Google Scholar
Patel Nayana, Jadeja Yuvraj, Bhadarka Harsha, Patel Molina, Patel Niket, Sodagar Nilofar. 2018. “Insight into different aspects of surrogacy practices”. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences 11 (3): 212–218.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_138_17
Google Scholar
Perucchietti Enrica. 2016. Utero in affitto. La fabbricazione di bambini, la nuova forma di schiavismo. I retroscena della maternità surrogata, delle derive dell’eugenetica agli interessi delle lobby. Marene: Rivoluzione.
Google Scholar
Piersanti Valeria, Consalvo Francesca, Signore Fabrizio, Del Rio Alessandro, Zaami Simona. 2021. “Surrogacy and ‘Procreative Tourism’. What Does the Future Hold from the Ethical and Legal Perspectives?” Medicina 57 (1): 47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010047
Google Scholar
Reardon David C., Craver Christopher. 2021. “Effects of pregnancy loss on subsequent postpartum mental health: A prospective longitudinal cohort study”. International journal of environmental research and public health 18 (4): 1–11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042179
Google Scholar
Robertson John A. 2016. “Other women’s wombs: Uterus transplants and gestational surrogacy”. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 3 (1): 68–86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw011
Google Scholar
Schicktanz Silke. 2007. “Why the way we consider the body matters. Reflections on four bioethical perspectives on the human body”. Philosophy 2 (1): 30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-2-30
Google Scholar
Schliesser Christine. 2016. “Körperlichkeit und Kommerzialisierung: zur theologisch-ethischen Problematik der Leihmutterschaft”. Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik 62 (2): 107–120.
Google Scholar
Schnittker Jason. 2022. “What makes sexual violence different? Comparing the effects of sexual and non-sexual violence on psychological distress”. SSM – Mental Health 2: 100115.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100115
Google Scholar
Sills Scott Eric (ed.). 2016. Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy. International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316282618
Google Scholar
Stefanelli Stefania. 2021. Procreazione medicalmente assistita e maternità surrogata. Limiti nazionali e diritti fondamentali. Milano: Giuffrè Francis Lefebvre.
Google Scholar
Tehran Hoda Ahmari, Tashi Shohreh, Mehran Nahid, Eskandari Narges, Dadkhah Tehrani Tahmineh. 2014. “Emotional experiences in surrogate mothers: A qualitative study”. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine 12 (7): 471–480.
Google Scholar
Teman Elly. 2008. “The social construction of surrogacy research: An anthropological critique of the psychosocial scholarship on surrogate motherhood”. Social science & medicine 67 (7): 1104–1112.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.026
Google Scholar
Tieu Matthew M. 2009. “Altruistic surrogacy. The necessary objectification of surrogate mothers”. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3): 171–175.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.024679
Google Scholar
Van Zyl Liezl, Walker Ruth. 2013. “Beyond Altruistic and Commercial Contract Motherhood. The Professional Model”. Bioethics 27 (7): 373–381.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01962.x
Google Scholar
Zenit. 2016. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Rejects Plan to Legalize, Regulate Surrogacy. https://zenit.org/2016/10/12/parliamentary-assembly-of-the-council-of-europe-rejects-plan-to-legalize-regulate-surrogacy/ (12.10.2016).
Google Scholar
Statistics
Downloads
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2023 Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International.
Licencja oraz prawa autorskie autorzy przekazują wydawcy, którym jest Redakcji Wydawnictw WT UO.
Am häufigsten gelesenen Artikel dieser/dieses Autor/in
- Roman Globokar, The Ethics of Albert Schweitzer as an Inspiration for Global Ethics , Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego: Bd. 40 Nr. 1 (2020): Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego
- Roman Globokar, Der Theologe im Dialog mit der säkularisierten Öffentlichkeit in Slowenien , Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego: Bd. 38 Nr. 2 (2018): Theologie in der Öffentlichkeit
- Roman Globokar, Zwischen Begeisterung und Besorgnis , Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego: Bd. 37 Nr. 1 (2017): Amoris laetitia - Evolution oder Revolution in der Lehre der katholischen Kirche zur Ehe?
