Philosophical and cultural basis of the main methods of legal education in the USA

Amsterdam A.G., Clinical Legal Education – 21th century perspective, “Journal of Legal Education”, 1984, v. 34.
  Google Scholar

Areeda P.E. , The Socratic Method(SM) (Lecture at Puget Sound 1/31/90), “Harvard Law Review”, 1996, v. 109, no. 5.
  Google Scholar

Atiyah P.S., Theory and Pragmatism in English Law, London 1987.
  Google Scholar

Aurebach S., Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Changes in Modern America, New York 1979.
  Google Scholar

Baker J., An introduction to English legal history , 4th edn., Butterworths, 2002.
  Google Scholar

Barthon T.D., Creative Problem Solving: Purpose, Meaning and Values, “California Western Law Review” 1998, v. 34, no. 2.
  Google Scholar

Brest P., The Responsibility of Law Schools: Educating Lawyers as Counselors and Problem Solvers, “Law and Contemporary Problems”, 1995, vol. 58.
  Google Scholar

Burg E.M., Clinic in the Classroom: A Step Toward Cooperation, “Journal of Legal Education”, 1987, vol. 37 Bradway J.S., The Legal Aid Clinic as an Educational Device, “The American Law Review”, 1934, vol. 7 Clinical Education for the Law Students In a Service Setting, Minoela – New York 1978.
  Google Scholar

Cambell N., Davis J., McKay G. (eds), Issue in Americanisation and Culture, Edinburgh 2004.
  Google Scholar

Carrington D., Heil Langdell! ,“Law and Social Inquiry”, 1995, v. 20.
  Google Scholar

Carrington P.D., Butterfly Effects: The Possibilities of Law Teaching in a Democracy, “Duke Law Journal”, 1992, v. 41.
  Google Scholar

Cook N., Law as Science: Revisiting Langdell’s Paradigm in the 21th Century, “North Dakota Law Review”, 2012, v. 82, no. 2.
  Google Scholar

Coursin D., Comment, Acting like a lawyer, “Wisconsin Law Review”, 2010.
  Google Scholar

Dubin J.C., Clinical Design for Social Justice Imperatives, “SMU Law Review” 1998, v. 51;
  Google Scholar

Sedillo Lopez A., Learning through Service in a Clinical Setting: The Effect of Specialization on Social Justice and Skills Training, “Clinical Law Review” 2001, v. 7.
  Google Scholar

Edwards H.T., Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Professions, “Michigan Law Review”, 1992, v. 91.
  Google Scholar

Fehrenbach H., Poiger U.G., Americanization Reconsidered, in: Idem, eds., Transactions, Transgressions, Transformations: American Culture in Western Europe and Japan, New York–Oxford 2000.
  Google Scholar

Frank J., Why Not a Clinical Lawyer-School?, “University of Pennsylvania Law Review ” 1933, v. 81, no. 8.
  Google Scholar

Gray T.C., Langdell’s Orthodoxy, “University of Pittsburg Law Review” 1983, v. 45.
  Google Scholar

Guerline P., Americanization and Globalization: The Power Behind the Words, “Annales du Monde Anglophone” 2002, no. 15.
  Google Scholar

Halperin J.L., Law in Books and Law in Action: The Problem of Legal Change, “ Maine Law Review” 2011, v. 64, no. 1.
  Google Scholar

Harwood S. , Judicial Activism: A Restrained Defense, London 1996.
  Google Scholar

Hoeflich M.H., Law & Geometry. Legal Science form Leibnitz to Langdell, “The American Journal of Legal History” 1986, v. XXX.
  Google Scholar

Holland K.M. (ed.) Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective, Macmillan 1991.
  Google Scholar

Horowitz M.J., Transformation of American Law 1780-1860, Cambridge-London 1977.
  Google Scholar

Kerper J., Creative Problem Solving vs. The Case Method: A Marvelous Adventure in Which Winnie-the-Pooh Meets Mrs. Palsgraf, “California Western Law Review” 1998, v. 34, No. 2.
  Google Scholar

Kimball B.A., The Langdell Problem: Historicizing the Century of Historiography, 1906-2000s, “University of Illinois Law and History Review”, Summer 2004, Vol. 22, I.
  Google Scholar

Kimbell B.E., The Inception of Modern Legal Education. C. C. Langdell 1826-1906, Chapel Hill 2009.
  Google Scholar

Kissam C., The Ideology of the Case Method/Final Examination Law School, “University of Cincinnati Law Review”, 2001, v. 70.
  Google Scholar

Klein S.R., Legal Education in United States and England: A Comparative Analysis, “Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review” 1991, v. 13.
  Google Scholar

Kloppenburg L., Educating Problem Solving Lawyers for our Professions and Communities, “Rutgers Law Review”, 2009, v. 61, no. 4.
  Google Scholar

Kosuri P., Losing My Religion: The Place of Social Justice in Clinical Legal Education, “Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice”, 2012, v. 32, I. 2.
  Google Scholar

Kronman A., The Socratic Method and the Development of the Moral Imagination, “University of Toledo Law Review”, 2000, vol. 31.
  Google Scholar

Legrand P., The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’, “Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law”, 1997, v. 4.
  Google Scholar

Leiter B., Legal Realism, in: Patterson D. (ed) A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Wiley-Blackwell 1996.
  Google Scholar

Llewellyn K., A Realistic Jurisprudence – The Next Step, “Columbia Law Review” 1930, v. 30, no. 4.
  Google Scholar

McMains C.R., The History of First Century American Legal Education: A Revisionist Perspective, “Washington University Law Review” 1981, v. 59, I. 3.
  Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow C., Aha? Is Creativity Possible in Legal Problem Solving and Teachable in Legal Education?, “Harvard Negotiation Law Review” 2001, v. 6.
  Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow C., When Winning Isn’t Everything – Lawyer as The Problem Solver, “Hofstra Law Review” 1999-2000, v. 28.
  Google Scholar

Mertz E., The Language of Law Schools: Thinking Like a Lawyer, Oxfor-New York 2007.
  Google Scholar

Morgan T. D., The Changing Face of Legal Education: Its Impact on What it Means to be a Lawyer, “Akron Law Review” 2012, v. 45.
  Google Scholar

Moskovitz M., Beyond the Case Method It’s Time to Teach with Problems, “Journal of Legal Education”, 1992, V. 42.
  Google Scholar

Mosley M.N., The reports of Socrates Demise have been greatly Exaggerated, A response to bang goes theory – debunking traditional legal education, “Phoenix Law Review”, 2010, vol. 3.
  Google Scholar

Oberer W.E., On Law, Lawyering and Law Professing: The Golden Sand, “Journal of Legal Education” 1989, v. 39, no. 2.
  Google Scholar

Ondeziel R., Is Globalisation a Code Word for Americaniastion? Contempleting McDondalds, Coca-Cola and military bases, „Tijdschrift voor sociale en economische geschiedenis“, 2007, v. 4, no. 3.
  Google Scholar

Patterson D., Langdell’s Legacy, Northwestern University Law Review, 1995.
  Google Scholar

Posner R.A., Legal Formalism, Legal Realism and the Interpretations of Statutes and The Constitution, “Case Western Reserve Law Review”, 1986-87, v. 37, no. 2.
  Google Scholar

Pound R., Law in Books and Law in Action, “American Law Review” 1910, v. 44.
  Google Scholar

Radwan A., Edukacja prawnicza wobec wyzwań XXI wieku, [w:] Stoczewska B. (ed.), Państwo i prawo w XXI wieku – szanse i zagrożenia (Materiały konferencyjne z IV Międzynarodowej Konferencji Krakowskiej Szkoły Wyższej im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego), Kraków 2004.
  Google Scholar

Sauveplanne J.G., Codified and Judge Made Law. The Role of Courts and Legislator in Civil and Common Law Systems, Amsterdam-Oxford-New York 1982.
  Google Scholar

Schauer F., Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning¸ London 2009.
  Google Scholar

Schneider C.E., The Socratic Method and the Goals of Legal Education: With Some Thoughts Inspired by Travel, “Hogaku Kyoshitsu”, Sept. 1995.
  Google Scholar

Schofield W., Christophus Collumbus Langdell, “The American Law Register” 1907, v. 55, no. 5.
  Google Scholar

Shimemura Y., Globalisation v. Americanisation: is the World being Americanised by the Dominance of American Culture?, “Comparative Civilization Review” 2002, no. 47.
  Google Scholar

Slapper G., History of Legal Education, “The Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education”, 2011, v. 8, no. 7.
  Google Scholar

Spiegel M., Theor y and Practice in Legal Education: An Essay on Clinical Legal Education, “UCLA Law Review” 1987, v. 34.
  Google Scholar

Srokosz J., The American discussion on the value of the Langdell’s education method of teaching students to „thinking like a lawyer”, and possibility of its implementation in Polish legal education, [in:] Aktuální otázky právní metodologie, Veèeøa M., Machalová T., Valdhans J., Brno 2014.
  Google Scholar

Stein R. M., The Path of Legal Education from Edward I to Langdell: History of Insular Reaction, “Chicago-Kent Law Review”, 1981, v. 57, I. 2.
  Google Scholar

Stelmach J., Sarkowicz R., Filozofia prawa XIX I XX wieku, Kraków 1999.
  Google Scholar

Stevens R., Law Schools: Legal Education in America from 1850s to 1980s, Chappel Hill–London 1983.
  Google Scholar

Susskind R., The End of Lawyers?: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services, Oxford 2010.
  Google Scholar

Trail W.R, Underwood W.R., The Decline Of Professional Legal Training And A Proposal For Its Revitalization In Professional Law Schools, “Baylor Law Review” 1996, v. 48.
  Google Scholar

Vandevellde K.J., Thinking Like a Lawyer: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Boulder 2011.
  Google Scholar

Watson A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law, Edinburgh 1974.
  Google Scholar

Weaver R.L., Langdell’s Legacy: Living with the Case Method, “Villanova Law Review”, 1991, v. 36.
  Google Scholar

Wieck W.M., The Lost World of Classical Legal Thought: Law and Ideology in America 1886-1937, New York – Oxford 1998.
  Google Scholar

Wolfe Ch. Judicial Activism, 2nd ed., Totowa, NJ, 1997.
  Google Scholar

Zoll F., Jaka szkoła prawa?: czy amerykańskie metody nauczania prawa mogą być przydatne w Polsce?, Kraków 2004.
  Google Scholar

http://judicialselection.us/judicial_selection/methods/selection_of_judges.cfm?state=, (Accessed: 1 November 2016).
  Google Scholar