Landscape in transition in the shadow of 2022 Russia’s invasion in Ukraine – notes from Hungary
Ágnes Erőss
University of Opole; Geographical Institute, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, ELKHhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2310-1897
Abstrakt
This research note focuses on two phenomena: the transformations in the landscape in Hungary as an effect of Russia’s invasion in Ukraine and the welcome/help centers that were established to channel mobility and provide a temporary safe space. I suggest that liminality (which serves as a main explanatory category) is characteristic of both. It is stated that in this context that the bodies of refugees are reminders of the existence of the (state) border, which gets reaffirmed by the process of welcoming and hosting and is also reflected in the visual reminders in the landscape. I also divide the management of the refugee crisis into three phases: spontaneous action, institutionalization, and sanitization. With the phase of sanitization (removing the physically existing “indicators” of the war, including refugees, volunteers, signs, and queues) the reality and severity of the war can be concealed, and the “normality” can be reinstated. Research is based on field observations and interviews taken in March 2022 in Budapest, Kisvárda, Vásárosnamény, Barabás, and Beregsurány in Hungary.
Słowa kluczowe:
liminality, (affective) borderscape, Russian invasion in Ukraine, Ukrainian refugee crisis, HungaryBibliografia
Amster, R. (2003). Patterns of Exclusion: Sanitizing Space, Criminalizing Homelessness. Social Justice. Race, Security & Social Movements, 30(1), 195-221.
Google Scholar
Árvay, A., Foote, K. (2020). The Spatiality of Memoryscapes, Public Memory, and Commemoration. In: De Nardi, S., Orange, H., High, S., Koskinen-Koivisto, E. (eds.): The Routledge Handbook of Memory and Place (pp.129-137). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Azaryahu, M. (2005). The beach at the end of the world: Eilat in Israeli popular culture. Social and Cultural Geography, 6(1), 117-133.
Google Scholar
Bettoni, G. (2021). Geopolitics and Images: From Images to Discourse. In: Mangiapane, F. Migliore, T. (eds): Images of Europe. The Union between Federation and Separation (pp. 69-89). Springer, Cham.
Google Scholar
Cantat, C. (2016). Rethinking mobilties, solidarity and migrant struggles beyond narratives of Crisis. Intersections, 2(4), 11-32.
Google Scholar
Csernicskó, I., Laihonen, P. (2015). Hybrid practices meet nation-state language policies: Transcarpathia in the twentieth century and today. Multilingua, 35(1), 1-30.
Google Scholar
Jones, R., Johnson, C., Brown, W., Popescu, G., Pallister-Wilkins, P., Mountz, A., Gilbert, E. (2017). Interventions on the state of sovereignty at the border. Political Geography, 59, 1-10.
Google Scholar
Landry, R., Bourhis, R. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 23–49.
Google Scholar
Paasi, A., Ferdoush, A. Md., Jones, R., Murphy, A. B., Agnew, J., Ochoa Espejo, P., Fall, J.J., Peterle, G. (2022). Locating the territoriality of territory in border studies. Political Geography, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102584
Google Scholar
Strakosch, E. (2010). Counter-monuments and Nation-Building in Australia. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 22 (3), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2010.502065.
Google Scholar
Tátrai, P., Erőss, Á, Kovály. K. (2017). Kin-state politics stirred by a geopolitical conflict: Hungary’s growing activity in post-Euromaidan Transcarpathia, Ukraine. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 66 (3), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.66.3.2
Google Scholar
Turner, V. (1973). The Center out There: Pilgrim’s Goal. History of Religions, 12. (3), 191-230.
Google Scholar
Wagner Tsoni, I. (2019). Affective borderscapes. Constructing, enacting and contesting borders across the Southeastern Mediterranean. Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society, Malmö.
Google Scholar
Wagner Tsoni, I., Frank, A.K. (2019). Writings on the wall: Textual traces of transit in the Aegean borderscape. Borders in Globalization Review, 1(1), 7-21.
Google Scholar
Statystyki
Downloads
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Border and Regional Studies
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
