Upper Silesia: a changing cross-border region. A field report from a Brazilian geographer
Abstrakt
This field report deals with a peripheral, or non-central cross-border region between Poland and Czech Republic. It presents some results of bibliographical research and field observations in the cultural-historical region of Silesia (PL: Śląsk; CZ: Slezsko), mainly in its part of Upper Silesia (PL: Górny Śląsk; CZ: Horní Slezsko). After the Introduction, the question of the location and position of cultural-historical Silesia and Upper Silesia is examined between the two countries. In the second place, the spatio-temporal development of the territorial formation of Silesia is presented. In the third place, the most important territorial features of the intensive urbanization process and the Silesian-Moravian agglomeration are treated. In the fourth part, which deals with “peripheral regionalism” in Central Europe, the report tries to show that Upper Silesia is a classic cross-border central region in the sense of a strategic “Heartland” between Poland and Czech Republic. In fifth place, the report addresses the current productive reconversions in Upper Silesia, the closure of coal mines and steel mills considered unproductive, the integration of the periphery into the central macro-regional production networks of the automotive industry, the gradual adaptation to the Paris Agreement, and the search for a service-based economy, mainly through historical and ecological tourism. In sixth and final place, the report addresses cross-border management, focusing on Euroregions, the EGTC Tritia, and functional urban areas (FUAS) in both sides of the countries. A concluding Discussion highlights that the concept of periphery may not be appropriate for Upper Silesia and, to some extent, for the entire cultural-historical Silesia, even though its geo-economic role in production networks is changing today. A brief Post Scriptum highlights the current state of cross-border integration processes, which respond to the uncertainties of nationalisms, the difficulties of integrating processes and productive reconversions, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine.
Słowa kluczowe:
Silesia, German minority on Upper Silesia, Poland, Czech Republic, peripheral regionalism, cross-border regionBibliografia
Amilhat-Szary, A.-L. (2015). Qu’est-ce qu’une frontière aujourd’hui? Paris: PUF.
Google Scholar
Berg, A. (1994). The logistics of privatization in Poland. In O. Blanchard, K. Froot, J. Sachs, (Eds). Transition in Eastern Europe, v.2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c6725/c6725.pdf
Google Scholar
Bialasiewicz, L. (2002). Upper Silesia: rebirth of a regional identity in Poland. Regional & Federal Studies v. 12, Issue 2, pp. 111-132.
Google Scholar
Böhm, H. Opioła, W. (2019). Czech–Polish Cross-Border (Non) Cooperation in the Field of the Labor Market: Why Does It Seem to Be Un-De-Bordered? Sustainability, 11,2855; doi:10.3390/su11102855.
Google Scholar
Böhm, H. (2015). Cross-border co-operation as a tool of environmental protection– example from Czech- Slovak borderland. Conference paper. June 2015. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291957951
Google Scholar
Böhm, H. (2014). A comparison of governance forms for cross-border cooperation within the EU. The Journal of Cross Border Studies in Ireland – No. 9, Arnagh.
Google Scholar
Brunet, R. (2002). Lignes de force de l’espace européen. Mappemonde 66, 14-19. Retrieved from http://www.mgm.fr/PUB/Mappemonde/M202/Brunet.pdf
Google Scholar
Brunet, R. (2001). Lé déchifrrement du monde : théorie et pratique de la géographie. Paris: Belin, 401 p.
Google Scholar
Brunet, R. (1986). La carte-modèle et les chorèmes. Mappemonde, 4. pp. 2-6. https://doi.org/10.3406/mappe.1986.2334.
Google Scholar
Brunet, R. (1980). La composition des modèles dans l’analyse spatiale. Espace géographique, tome 9, n°4, pp. 253-265. https://doi.org/10.3406/spgeo.1980.3572.
Google Scholar
Buttin, F. (2005). The Polish-Czechoslovak Conflict over Teschen Silesia (1918–1920): a case study. Perspectives, 25 winter 2005/2006, pp. 63-78.
Google Scholar
Cala, M., Mazurkiewicz, M., Tajdus, A., & Walaszczyk, J. (n.d.). Brownfields in Upper Silesia coalfields. Kraków: AGH University of Science & Technology. Retrieved from: https://home.agh.edu.pl/~cala/papers/Brown2.pdf.
Google Scholar
Ceska Republika (a). RIS. Regionální informační servis. Retrieved from https://www.risy.cz/cs/
Google Scholar
Ceska Republika (b) (2019). Obyvatelstvo. Český statistický úřad. Retrieved from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/obyvatelstvo_lide
Google Scholar
Ceska Republika (c) (2019). Statistická ročenka Moravskoslezského kraje, Český statistický úřad. Retrieved from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/statisticka-rocenka-moravskoslezskeho-kraje-2019
Google Scholar
Cieszyn makes an impression (2018). Cieszyn Town Council.
Google Scholar
Chilla, T., Evrard, E., & Schulz, C., (2010). Metroborder: cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions. Luxemburg: ESPON & University of Luxemburg.
Google Scholar
Cohesion Policy and Poland. (a) (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/information/cohesion-policy-achievement-and-future-investment/factsheet/poland_en.pdf
Google Scholar
Cohesion Policy and the Czech Republic. (b). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/information/cohesion-policy-achievement-and-future-investment/factsheet/czech_republic_en.pdf
Google Scholar
Czainski, K. (2021). Map of Upper Silesia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_Upper_Silesia.png
Google Scholar
Czechinvest. (n.d.). Automotive industry in the Czech Republic. Retrieved from https://www.mzv.cz/file/672401/brochure_czech_automotive_industry.pdf
Google Scholar
Czech Republic. (n.d.). Regional Development Strategy of the Czech Republic 2021+. Prague: Ministry of Regional Development. Retrieved from https://mmr.cz/getmedia/4023f194-31f3-4269-83ef-0e2c86255e92/SRR21-brozura-A5-tisk-EN-9_12_2019-(002).pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf
Google Scholar
Czech Statistical Office (2022a). Population. Retrieved from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/obyvatelstvo_lide on december 27, 2022.
Google Scholar
Czech Statistical Office (2022b). Population of municipalities – 1 january 2022. Retrieved from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/population-of-municipalities-1-january-2022 on december, 27, 2022
Google Scholar
Deichmann, J. I. (2010). Foreign direct investment in the Czech Republic: the role of origin effects and government promotion abroad. Comparative Economic Studies 52, 249-272.
Google Scholar
Demographia World Urban Areas. (June 2021). Built-Up Urban Areas or World Agglomerations. 17th Annual Edition. Retrieved from http://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf
Google Scholar
Despiney-Zochowska, B. (2006). Les eurorégions en Pologne. Un essai d’analyse en terme de district industriel. Strates, 12.
Google Scholar
Didelon, C., Richard, Y., & Van Hamme, G. (2011). Le territoire européen. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Google Scholar
Domański, B., Guzik, R., Gwosdz, K. (2008). The New International Division of Labour and the Changing Role of the Periphery: The Case of the Polish Automotive Industry. In: Ch. Tamasy, M. Taylor (Eds). Globalising worlds and new economic configurations. Ashgate.
Google Scholar
Domanski, B. (2003). Industrial change and foreign direct investment in the postsocialist economy: the case of Poland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2): 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776403010002001
Google Scholar
Drevet, J.-F. (2008). Histoire de la politique régionale de l’Union Européenne. Paris: Belin.
Google Scholar
Dumas, P. (1922). Le partage de la Haute-Silésie. Annales de Géographie, t. 31, n.169, 1-14.
Google Scholar
Economic potential. Ostrava. Retrieved from https://www.ostrava.cz/en/podnikatel-investor/city-profile/economic-potential
Google Scholar
EGTC Tritia - Basic information. Retrieved from http://www.egtctritia.eu/home
Google Scholar
Espon (2020). Policy brief. Structural change in coal phase-out regions. Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/structural-change
Google Scholar
Espon (2007). Espon project 1.4.3 Study on Urban Functions. Final Report. Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/fr-1.4.3_April2007-final.pdf.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2020). Regional profile. Silesia. Initiative for coal regions in transition. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/silesia_regional_profile_-_start_technical_assistance.pdf
Google Scholar
European Commision (2013). The Core Network Corridors. Trans European Transport Network 2013. Brussels: Directorate General for Mobility and Transport, 2013. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/tentec/tentec-portal/site/brochures_images/b1_2013_brochure_lowres.pdf
Google Scholar
European Commision (n. d.). Mobility and Transport. Baltic Adriatic Corridor. Retrieved from: https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/infrastructure-and-investment/trans-european-transport-network-ten-t/baltic-adriatic-corridor_en.
Google Scholar
Eurostat (2020) Statistical regions in the European Union and partner countries. NUTS and statistical regions 2021. 2020 Edition. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/ks-gq-20-092
Google Scholar
Faludi, A. (2004). Territorial cohesion: old (French) wine in new bottles. Urban Studies, v. 41, No. 7, 1349-1365.
Google Scholar
Farole, T., Goga, S. & Ionescu-Heroiu, M. (2018). Rethinking lagging regions. Using Cohesion Policy to deliver on the potential of Europe’s regions. Washington: The World Bank, 137 p. Retrieved from http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/739811525697535701/RLR-FULL-online-2018-05-01.pdf
Google Scholar
Faludi, A. (2007). La dimension territoriale de l’intégration européenne. L’information géographique, 2007/4, v 71, 27-42.
Google Scholar
Farand, C. (2020). Poland agrees coal mining phase out with unions by 2049. Climate Home News. 25 September. https://www.climatechangenews.com/2020/09/25/poland-agrees-coal-mining-phase-unions-2049.
Google Scholar
Folfas, P. (2017). Poland in International Production Networks of Automotive Industry. Annuals of the Administration and Law. Year XVII, Issue 2, pp. 161-172.
Google Scholar
Foucher, M. (2016). Le retour des frontiers. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 57 p.
Google Scholar
Girault, C. (2018). Grande région: l’autre nom de la macrorégion. In N. Mareï & Y. Richard. (Eds.) Dictionnaire de la régionalisation du monde, pp. 54-56. Neuilly-sur-Seine: Éditions Atlande.
Google Scholar
Gliwicka fabryka Opla liczy na record. Fleet Manager. Business Automotive Technologies. Retrieved from https://menadzerfloty.pl/wydarzenia/gliwicka-fabryka-opla-liczy-na-rekord/
Google Scholar
Gorzelak, G. (2008). Regional development and “New” Regionalism in Poland. In J.W. Scott (ed.), De-coding new regionalism. Shifting socio-political contexts in Central Europe and Latin America, pp.177-198. Farnham-Burlington.
Google Scholar
Gzyl, J. (1990). Lead and cadmium contamination of soil and vegetables in the Upper Silesia region of Poland. The science of the Total Environment, 96, 199-209.
Google Scholar
Hartshorne, R. (1933). Geographical and political boundaries in Upper Silesia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. XXIII, 23(4), 195-224.
Google Scholar
Heffner, K., Solga, B. (2011). Historical Silesia in the European Union structures. Region and regionalism, 10, 2, pp. 37-58.
Google Scholar
Hettne, B., Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the rise of regionness. New Political Economy, v. 5, No 3, 457-473.
Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1996a). Era do Capital, 1848-1875; 5ª ed., Rio de Janeiro, Paz & Terra.
Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1996b). Era dos Extremos: o breve século XX, 1914-1991, Rio de Janeiro, Paz & Terra.
Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1992). Era dos Impérios, 3a ed., 1875-1914, Rio de Janeiro, Paz & Terra.
Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1982). Era das Revoluções: Europa, 1789-1848, Rio de Janeiro, Paz & Terra.
Google Scholar
Invest More. (n.d.). Investment incentives last year went mostly to the Moravian-Silesian and South Moravian regions. 8 April 2022. Retrieved from https://invest-msr.com/en/investment-incentives-last-year-went-mostly-to-the-moravian-silesian-and-south-moravian-regions
Google Scholar
Invest More. (n.d.). Ostrava has been ranked the best place for business in the Region. 1. June. 2022. Retrieved from: https://invest-msr.com/en/ostrava-has-been-ranked-the-best-place-for-business-in-the-region
Google Scholar
Kolejna firma z branży automotive inwestuje w Gliwicach. Investmap.pl. 27/01/23, Retrieved from https://investmap.pl/kolejna-firma-z-branzy-automotive-inwestuje-w-gliwicach.a149388
Google Scholar
Kolossov, V., Więckowski, M. (2018). Border changes in Central and Eastern Europe: an introduction. Geographia Polonica, v. 91(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0106.
Google Scholar
Kornilov, A.A. (2020). Book review: Mattheis, F., Raineri, L. & Russo, A. (2019). Fringe Regionalism. When Peripheries Become Regions. Palgrave Macmillan, 105 p. Vestnik R)UDN. International Relations, 20 (3), 648—651. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-3-648-651.
Google Scholar
Kosmala, G. (2013). Geographical characteristics of Silesia. In: L. Harc et al. Cuius regio? Ideological and Territorial Cohesion of the Historical Region of Silesia. (c. 1000-2000). Vol. 1. The long formation of the region (c. 1000-1526). Wroclaw: Wroclaw University; Publishing House eBooki,. ed. Przemysław Wiszewski, pp. 19-39.
Google Scholar
Kolejna firma z branży automotive inwestuje w Gliwicach. Investmap.pl. 27/01/23, Retrieved from https://investmap.pl/kolejna-firma-z-branzy-automotive-inwestuje-w-gliwicach.a149388.
Google Scholar
Kozarzewski, P., Battowski, M. (2016). Change in economic paradigm: privatization and State capture in Poland. Warsaw: CASE Research Paper n 3 (127). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2814116.
Google Scholar
Kurekowa, L. M. (2018). The automotive industry in Central Europe: a success? January 2018. 0.15185/izawol.448 Retrieved from https://wol.iza.org/articles/the-automotive-industry-in-central-europe-a-success/long
Google Scholar
Lamparska, M. (2019). Post-mining tourism in Upper Silesia and Czech-Moravia Country. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 9(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2019.2.06.
Google Scholar
Lipton, D., Sachs, J. (1990). Privatization in Eastern Europe: the case of Poland. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/1990/06/1990b_bpea_lipton_sachs_summers.pdf.
Google Scholar
Mareï, N., Richard, Y. (2018). Intégration régionale: comment sortir de la confusion conceptuelle?, pp. 63-67. In Dictionnaire de la régionalisation du monde. N. Mareï &Y. Richard (Ed(s).). Neuilly-sur-Seine: Éditions Atlande.
Google Scholar
McKinder, H. (1942). Democratic ideals and reality: a study in the politics of reconstruction / by Sir Halford J. Mackinder. [edited by and] with a new introduction by Stephen V. Mladineo. -- NDU Press defense classic ed. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/139619/1942_democratic_ideals_reality.pdf
Google Scholar
McKinder, H. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 2004, 170(4), 298-321.
Google Scholar
Misak, Stanislas. (n.d.). Centre of Energy and Environmental Technologies. CEET. VST Technical University of Ostrava. Ppt presentation.
Google Scholar
Moraes, A.C.R. (2000). Bases da formação territorial do Brasil. O território colonial brasileiro no “longo” século XVI. São Paulo: HUCITEC, 2000.
Google Scholar
Mortimer. G. (2015). The Origins of the Thirty Years War and the Revolt in Bohemia, 1618. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. DOI 10.1057/9781137543851.
Google Scholar
Newman, D. (2003). On Borders and Power: A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 18(1), 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2003.9695598.
Google Scholar
OECD (n.d). Functional urban areas by country. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-statistics/functional-urban-areas.htm
Google Scholar
Poland (2006). National Development Strategy 2007-2015. Ministry of Regional Development. Warsaw, November. Retrieved from https://extranet.who.int/countryplanningcycles/sites/default/files/planning_cycle_repository/poland/ndp_poland.pdf
Google Scholar
Pavlínek, P. (2020). Restructuring and internationalization of the European automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography 20, pp. 509–541. doi:10.1093/jeg/lby070.
Google Scholar
Prothero, G.W. (ed.). (1920). Upper Silesia. Handbooks prepared under the Direction of the Historical Section of the Foreign Office. London: H.M. Stationery Office.
Google Scholar
Pfrimer, M.H. (2011). Heartland Sul-americano? Dos discursos geopolíticos à territorialização de um novo triângulo estratégico boliviano. GEOUSP - Espaço e Tempo, Nº 29, pp. 131-144.
Google Scholar
Poland (2021). Statistics Poland. Statistical Bulletin. Nº 7/2021. Warsaw. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/other-studies/informations-on-socio-economic-position/statistical-bulletin-no-72021,4,127.html
Google Scholar
Population of Cities in Poland (2023). Retrieved from https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/cities/poland
Google Scholar
Pyka, R. & Behr, V. (2019). A metropolitan area in Upper Silesia, an innovative governance. Abstract. Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest , v. 4, Issue 4, 7-40.
Google Scholar
Rückert, A. A. (2019a). Territorial policies in changing scenarios. Cross-border processes and cross-border regions in the European Union and South America. Porto Alegre / Brasília, UFRGS/CNPq.
Google Scholar
Rückert, A. A. (2019b). Territorial policies in changing scenarios. Cross-border processes and cross-border regions in the European Union and South America. Porto Alegre: UFRGS/FAPERGS.
Google Scholar
Rykiel, Z. (2002). Social and spatial integration in the Katowice region, Poland. L’Espace géographique. 2002/4 (tome 31), 345-354.
Google Scholar
Santos, M. (1978). Por uma geografia nova: da crítica da geografia a uma geografia crítica. São Paulo: HUCITEC/Edusp.
Google Scholar
Scott, J. W. (2015). Bordering, Border Politics and Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe. In: Neighbourhood Policy and the Construction of the European External Borders. F. Celata, R. Coletti Eds. Springer International Publishing. Switzerland. GeoJournal Library 115, 27- 37. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18452-4_2.
Google Scholar
Scott, J.W. (2008). Introduction. In: Scott, J.W. (ed). De-coding new regionalism. Shifting socio-political contexts in Central Europe and Latin America, pp. 3-16. Farnham (UK); Burlington (USA).
Google Scholar
Silva, G. do C. (1981). Conjuntura política nacional, o Poder Executivo & Geopolítica do Brasil. 3rd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria José Olympio Editora.
Google Scholar
Skoczkowski, T. Bielecki, S., Kochański, M., Korczak, K. (2020). Climate-change induced uncertainties, risks and opportunities for the coal-based region of Silesia: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.001
Google Scholar
Staszewska A., Żemła, M. (2013). The Industrial Monuments Route of the Silesian Voivodeship as an example of the regional tourism product enhancing tourism competitiveness of the region. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2(1), 37-53. DOI:10.2478/cjot2013-0003.
Google Scholar
Steislinger, J. A. (2014). Ducatus Silesiae Tabula. In: L. Harc et al. (eds.). Cuius régio? Ideological and territorial cohesion of Silesia. The strengthening of Silesian regionalism (1526-1740). Vol 2. Wroclaw: Publishing House e Book.com.pl.
Google Scholar
Stellantis Gliwice | Eurofound. Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/emcc/erm/factsheets/stellantis-gliwice
Google Scholar
Stellantis Gliwice factory. Interia.pl. Motoryzacja. Retrieved from https://motoryzacja.interia.pl/wideo/video,vId,3108824
Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Making globalization work. London, Penguin Group.
Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton.
Google Scholar
Strauchold, G. (2014). Ethnic issues and the functioning of Silesia as a region in the years 1918-1945. In: Cuius regio? Ideological and territorial cohesion of Silesia. Region divided. Times of Nation-Sates (1918-1945). eds L. Harc, et al. Wrocław Publishing House eBooki. 2014, pp. 129-162.
Google Scholar
Svozilík, V. et al. (2021). Comparison of the Air Pollution Mathematical Model of PM10 and Moss Biomonitoring Results in the Tritia Region. Atmosphere, 12, 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060656
Google Scholar
Szabó, P. (2008). The pentagon and other geometrical figures of Europe’s economic core. Romanian Review of Regional Studies, v. IV, No. 2, 11-20.
Google Scholar
Szajnowska-Wysocka, A., Zuzańska-Żyśko, E. (2013). The Upper-Silesian conurbation on the path towards the “Silesia” metropolis. Bulletin of Geography. Socio–economic Series No. 21, 111–124.
Google Scholar
Travassos, M. (1938). Projeção continental do Brasil. 3aed. São Paulo, Companhia Editora Nacional.
Google Scholar
Treaty of Berlin (1742). Retrieved from https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Treaty_of_Berlin_(1742)#/google_vignette.
Google Scholar
Treaty of Peace with Germany (Treaty of Versailles) (1919). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/history/pdf/treaty_of_versailles-112018.pdf.
Google Scholar
Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany, 1990. Retrieved from https://foothill.edu/german-unification-study/finalset.html.
Google Scholar
Wassenberg, B., Reitel, B. (2015). Territorial cooperation in Europe. A historical perspective. Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union.
Google Scholar
Wiszewski, P. (2013). Whose region is it? A few words on a certain research project and Silesian history. In: Cuius regio? Ideological and Territorial Cohesion of the Historical Region of Silesia. (c. 1000-2000). Vol. 1, The long formation of the region (c. 1000-1526). Wroclaw: Wroclaw University; Publishing House eBooki, 2013. ed. P. Wiszewski, pp. 9-18.
Google Scholar
Statystyki
Downloads
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Border and Regional Studies
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.