Stylistic norm

Marie Krčmová



Abstract

The study deals with the topic of stylistic norms which have the character of tendencies in expressing particular types of messages. They are less binding than linguistic norms, although they do exist, and the creator as well as the receptor of texts are intuitively aware of them. They are shaped analogically, like linguistic norms, in the process of the creation of texts; and they are acquired in a similar way by generalization on the basis of previously known texts linked to a communicational situation. The process of the acquisition of stylistic norms is never finished because (in contrast to linguistic norms) the sources of their identification are very diverse, and their repertoire develops throughout the whole human life. In the study the author tries to present their general characterization, and consequently to characterize these norms for the traditionally mentioned primary and secondary functional styles. Even though the paper proceeds from the Czech situation and from the understanding of style and stylistics common in Czech linguistics, these are general norms applicable to the situation in various cultural environments, at least in the European cultural area.

Keywords:

stylistic norm, acquisition of stylistic norms, basic characteristics of stylistic norms

Cvrček V. ad., 2015, Mluvnice současné češtiny. 1. Jak se píše a mluví, Praha.
  Google Scholar

Čechová M., 2008, Pojetí a pojmosloví stylistiky. – Současná stylistika, red. M. Čechová, Praha, s. 16–58.
  Google Scholar

Daneš F., 1996, Text a jeho ilustrace, „Slovo a slovesnost“ 57, s. 174–189.
  Google Scholar

Havránek B., 1932, Úkoly spisovného jazyka a jeho kultura. – Spisovná čeština a jazyková kultura, red. B. Havránek i M. Weingart, Praha, s. 32–84.
  Google Scholar

Homoláč J., Nebeská I., 2000, Příspìvek ke kritické analýze pojmu jazyková norma, „Slovo a slovesnost“ 61, s. 102–109.
  Google Scholar

Jelínek M., 1991, Pojem funkčního stylu v řečové stylistice. – Synteza w stylistyce słowiańskiej, red. S. Gajda, Opole, s. 13–19.
  Google Scholar

Jelínek M., 1992a, Pojetí stylu u praských strukturalistů, „Česká literatura“ 40, s. 209–216.
  Google Scholar

Jelínek M., 1992b, Problematika definice pojmu „styl“, „Stylistyka“ I, s. 15–26.
  Google Scholar

Jelínek M., 1995, Stylistika. – Příruční mluvnice češtiny, red. P. Karlík, M. Nekula i Z. Rusínová, Praha, s. 701–782.
  Google Scholar

Kraus J., Kuchař J. et al., 1981, Současný stav a vývojové perspektivy kodifikace spisovné češtiny, „Slovo a slovesnost“ 42, s. 228–238.
  Google Scholar

Krčmová M., 1994a, Stylové normy a jejich místo ve stylistické teorii a stylizační praxi. – Stylistyczne konfrontacje, red. S. Gajda i M. Balowski, Opole, s. 33–38.
  Google Scholar

Krčmová M., 1994b, O místo stylistiky v rámci vìd o jazyce, „Jazykovìda. Linguistica“ 1, s. 15–22.
  Google Scholar

Krčmová M., 1994c, Ke kořenům vytváření komunikačních kompetencí. – Kształcenie porozumiewania się, red. S. Gajda i J. Nocoń, Opole, s. 29–35.
  Google Scholar

Krčmová M., 2003, Mluvenost a psanost jako slohotvorné činitele. – Sborník prací Filozoficko-přírodovìdecké fakulty Slezské univerzity v Opavì. D3, s. 29–35.
  Google Scholar

Krčmová M., 2008a, Deklarování estetické funkce jako konstituující faktor projevu. – Současná stylistika, red. M. Čechová, Praha, s. 296–331.
  Google Scholar

Krčmová M., 2008b, Slohová charakteristika prostředkù lexikálních. – Současná stylistika, red. M. čechová, Praha, s. 169–178.
  Google Scholar

Krčmová M., 2016, Dichotomie vyjadřovací a dichotomie funkční, heslo v Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny, online, http://czechency.org (v přípravì, vyjde 2016).
  Google Scholar

Mareš P., 2014, Jak Karel Hausenblas vymezoval styl, „Jazykovìdné aktuality“ 51, s. 84–90.
  Google Scholar

Minářová E., 2008a, Slohotvorné činitele. – Současná stylistika, red. M. Čechová, Praha, s. 75–92.
  Google Scholar

Minářová E., 2008b, Teorie funkčních stylů. – Současná stylistika, red. M. Čechová, Praha, s. 93–105.
  Google Scholar

Nebeská I., 1994, Normy v řečové komunikaci. – Sociolingvistické a psycholingvistické aspekty jazykovej komunikácie, red. V. Patráš, Banská Bystrica, s. 78–83.
  Google Scholar

Nebeská I., 2002, Norma jazyková. – Encyklopedický slovník češtiny, red. P. Karlík, M. Nekula i J. Pleskalová, Praha, s. 288–289.
  Google Scholar

Skubalanka T., 1995, O definicjach stylu, „Stylistyka“ 4, s. 7–23. Styl? Moje dzisiejsze rozumienie stylu, 1995, „Stylistyka“ 4, s. 222–297.
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-01-10

Cited by

Krčmová, M. (2020). Stylistic norm. Stylistyka, 25, 253–266. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka.25.2016.15

Authors

Marie Krčmová 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.