Language consciousness and communication styles in the culture of everyday life
Svitlana P Bibik
Abstract
The article deals with the style qualification issue as a way of verbal thinking. It is noted that the language consciousness is a part of the public consciousness – moral, ethical, national, legal, environmental, historical, aesthetic, political, religious, etc., that is represented in oral and written language practice. It was proposed to differ functional styles features, based on the type of language awareness, and the system itself considered to be a communicative-style paradigm. It was emphasized that communication styles are formed historically as a result of constant connection of situational use of language according to its social and cultural functions. In this regard, it was determined that the functional style is a certain type of language and mental activity. It depends on extralinguistic factors (type of com- municants interaction, form, purpose of communication).
Keywords:
language consciousness, style, everyday and practical language consciousness, theoretical language consciousness, culture of everyday lifeReferences
Bahtin M. M., 1979, Problema rečevyh žanrov. - M. M. Bahtin, Èstetika slovesnogo tvorčestva, Moskva, s. 237-280.
Google Scholar
Bibik S. P., 2013, Usna lìteraturna mova v ukraïnsʹkìj kulʹturì povsâkdennâ, Nìžin.
Google Scholar
Gajda S., 2015, Aktualʹnye zadači stilistiki, „Aktualʹnye problemy stilistiki", № 1, s.11—21.
Google Scholar
Gajda S.., 2012, Styl narodowy jako kategoria stylistyczna, „Stylistyka”, XXI, з. 7-18.
Google Scholar
Gnatûk L. P., 2010, Movnij fenomen Grigorìâ Skovorodi v kontekstì staro¬ukraïnsʹkoï knižnoï tradicìï, Kiïv.
Google Scholar
Ejger G. V., 1990, Mehanizmy kontrolâ âzykovoj pravilʹnosti vyskazyvaniâ. Harʹkov.
Google Scholar
Êrmolenko S. Â., 1999, Narisi z ukraïnsʹkoï slovesnostì: (Stilìstika ta kulʹ¬tura movi), Kiïv.
Google Scholar
Zelenʹko A. S., 2004, Obg̀runtuvannâ principìv strukturno-semantičnogo do¬slìdžennâ movi, „ Vìsnik Lʹvìvsʹkogo unìversitetu. Serìâ fìlologìčna". vip. 34, č. Ì, s. 182-187.
Google Scholar
Kožina M. N., 1977, Stilistika russkogo âzyka, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Lotman Û. M., 1992, Poètika bytovogo povedeniâ v russkoj kulʹture 18 veka.- Û. M. Lotman. Izbrannye statʹi v treh tomah, Tallinn, t. 1, s. 248-268.
Google Scholar
Macûk G. P., 2001, Preskriptivne movoznavstvo v Galičinì (perša polovina XIX st.), Lʹvìv.
Google Scholar
Nikitina S. E., 1993, Ustnaâ narodnaâ kulʹtura i âzykovoe soznanie, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Nikitina S. E., 1989, Âzykovoe soznanie i samosoznanie ličnosti v narodnoj kulʹture, „Âzyk i ličnostʹ", Moskva, s. 34—40.
Google Scholar
Selìgej P., 2012. Movna svìdomìstʹ: struktura, tipologìâ, vihovannâ, Kiïv.
Google Scholar
Sincov E. V., 2007. Stileobrazuûŝaâ rolʹ myšleniâ v literaturnom âzyke. „Мixtura verborum 2006: topologiâ sovremennosti", Samara, s.81-100.
Google Scholar
Ûnina E. A., 1989, Issledovanie tipov myšleniâ posredstvom funkcionalʹno-stilističeskogo analiza reči, „Funkcionirovanie âzyka v različnyhtipah teksta", Permʹ, s. 59-69.
Google Scholar
Âvorsʹka G. M., 2000, Preskriptivna lìngvìstika âk diskurs: mova, kulʹtura, vlada, Kiïv.
Google Scholar
Âzyk, 1987, Âzyk i kulʹtura, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Authors
Svitlana P BibikStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
