Językowe sposoby wyrażania punktu kulminacyjnego w opowiadaniach potocznych
Katarzyna Wyrwas
Abstract
The turning point in the everyday narratives may be signaled in several ways. Lexical exponents of complicating action are adverbs or adverbial phrases, which indicate the rate of speed, urgency of action and shortness of the period preceding the performance of the stock and the lack of preparation for its implementation. The climax of the story can be highlighted by the onomatopoeic words indicating the rate of unfolding events.
The turning point may be signaled in compound sentences, which distinctly oppose events before the climax with events of climax. The climax of the story can also be indicated inflexionally by changing the past
forms to historical present. Present fonns serve to emphasize the drama and events of impending danger and highlight change of situation. An important feature is that historical present forms provide delimitation in conversational narrative: present tense forms occurring alternately with the forms of the past tense is used to separate each subsequent event from other event, allow speaker to organize the story in chronological following segments.The complicating action in colloquial stories is emphasized also phonetically: due to changes in accentuation and intonation. Full sentence pitch playing a special role by enhancement of the selected word in a sentence, in this case by extending the accented vowels. Also rising pitch observed in complicating action parts maintains a high level of listeners interest and tension. Listeners are interpreting rising pitch as a announcement of further string of text.In addition to the factors mentioned, in the expressive, lively „acting out” of history narrators use such dramatization signals as short sentences, verbs elliptic or replace their onomatopoeic words. This makes the complexity of action and a turning point clearly defined, effectively engaging the attention and emotions of the audience.
Keywords:
conversational narrative, complicating action, point, historical presentReferences
Bal M., 2012, Narratologia. Wprowadzenie do teorii narracji. Przeł. J. Woźniak i in., Kraków.
Google Scholar
Bańko M., 2008, Współczesny polski onomatopeikon: ikoniczność w języku. Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Bańko M„ 2009, Słownik onomatopei, czyli wyrazów dźwięko- i ruchonaśladowczych, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Bartmiński J., 1978, Swoiste formy orzeczeń w języku ustnym (orzeczenie onomatopeiczne, kompozycjonalne, zaimkowe, podwojone). - Studia nad składnią polszczyzny mówionej, red. T. Skubalanka, Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Bokus B., 1991, Tworzenie opowiadań przez dzieci. O linii i polu narracji, Kielce.
Google Scholar
Boniecka B., 1977, Funkcje składniowe wykrzykników onomatopeicznych, „Polonica”, t. 3.
Google Scholar
Dijk T.A. van, 1985, Działanie, opis działania a narracja. Przeł. M.B. Fedewicz, „Pamiętnik Literacki”, z. 1.
Google Scholar
Dobrzyńska T„ 1993, Tekst. Próba syntezy, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Dukiewicz L., 1978, Intonacja wypowiedzi polskich. Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Dukiewicz L., Sawicka 1., 1995, Fonetyka i fonologia, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Fludernik M., 1991, The Historical Present Tense Yet Again: Tense Switching and Narrative Dynamics in Oral and Quasi-Oral Storytelling, „Text”, vol. 11, No. 3.
Google Scholar
Fludernik M., 1992, The Historical Present Tense in English Literature. An Oral Pattern and Its Literary Adaptation, „Language and Literature”, vol. 17.
Google Scholar
Fludernik M., 2003, Chronology, Time, Tense and Experientiality in Narrative, „Language and Literature”, vol. 12.
Google Scholar
Gajda S., 1982, Podstawy badań stylistycznych nad językiem naukowym, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Głowiński M., Kostkiewiczowa T„ Okopień-Sławińska A., Sławiński J., 1998, Słownik terminów literackich, red. J. Sławiński, Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Grepl M., 1967, Emocjonalne motivované aktualizace v syntaktickć strukturę vÿpovëdi, Brno.
Google Scholar
Greszczuk B., 1993, Składniowe wykładniki negacji i ich funkcje w historii języka polskiego, Rzeszów.
Google Scholar
Grzegorczykowa R., 1975, Funkcje semantyczne i składniowe polskich przysłówków, Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Klemensiewicz Z., Lehr-Spławiński T., Urbańczyk S., 1981, Gramatyka historyczna języka polskiego, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Labov W., 1997, Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis, „Journal of Narrative and Life History”, vol. 7, No. 1-4.
Google Scholar
Labov W., Waletzky J., 1967, Narrative Analysis: Oral Version of Personal Experience.- Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, ed. J. Helm, Seattle-London.
Google Scholar
Mayen J., 1972, O stylistyce utworów mówionych, Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Mazur J., 1986, Organizacja tekstu potocznego. Na przykładzie Języka polskiego i rosyjskiego, Lublin.
Google Scholar
Nikolajeva T.M., 1977, Frazovaja intonacija slavjanskich jazykov, Moskwa.
Google Scholar
Norrick N.R., 2007, Conversational Storytelling. - The Cambridge Companion to Narrative, ed. D. Herman, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Pisarkowa K., 1975, Składnia rozmowy telefonicznej, Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Schiffrin D., 1981, Tense Variation in Narrative, „Language”, vol. 57, No. 1.
Google Scholar
Stempel W.-D., 1990, Narracja potoczna jako prototyp. Przel. A. Nermer, „Pamiętnik Literacki”, z. 1.
Google Scholar
Wierzchowska B., 1980, Fonetyka i fonologia języka polskiego, Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Wilkoń A., 1976, O języku i stylu ..Ogniem i mieczem” H. Sienkiewicza. Studia nad tekstem, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Wilkoń A., 1988, Funkcje kategorii czasu i aspektu w tekstach artystycznych. - Stylistyczna akomodacja systemu gramatycznego, red. T. Skubalanka, Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Wolfson N., 1979, The Conversational Historical Present Alternation, „Language”, vol. 55, No. 1.
Google Scholar
Wyrwas K., 2013, Opowiadania potoczne w świetle genologii lingwistycznej, Katowice.
Google Scholar
Żydek-Bednarczuk U., 1994, Struktura tekstu rozmowy potocznej, Katowice.
Google Scholar
Authors
Katarzyna WyrwasStatistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Katarzyna Wyrwas, Mind and heart - memory in selected Indo-European languages , Stylistyka: Vol. 28 (2019): Styl i pamięć
- Katarzyna Wyrwas, Wielojęzyczność w reklamie - nadawca i narracja , Stylistyka: Vol. 12 (2003): Wielojęzyczność a styl - Multilingualism and Style
- Katarzyna Wyrwas, Genre o f Speech’s Semantic Dominant (on Example o f Negation in Spoken Complaint) , Stylistyka: Vol. 15 (2006): Styl i kultura
- Katarzyna Wyrwas, Same Remarks on Women's- and Men's- Style of Storytelling , Stylistyka: Vol. 13 (2004): Style and Gender
- Katarzyna Wyrwas, Kawał a narracja , Stylistyka: Vol. 10 (2001): Stylistyka dziś - Style and Humour - Stil' i ûmor
- Katarzyna Wyrwas, Skarga potoczna w strukturze narracyjnej , Stylistyka: Vol. 14 (2005): Stylistyka i Kożyna - Stylistics and Kozhina
- Katarzyna Wyrwas, The Struckture of Speech Complaint , Stylistyka: Vol. 9 (2000): Czech Stylistics
- KATARZYNA WYRWAS, Język i styl powieści pt. Pokraj Andrzeja Saramonowicza – rekonesans , Stylistyka: Vol. 32 No. 32 (2023): Stylistyka
