The genre system of the religious style

Tatʹâna V. Ickovič

Уральский федеральнй университет, Екатеринбург
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5841-2943

Abstract

The constructive principle of prototextuality implies an obligatory indestructible connection of all modern genotypes with text prototype: it ensures the continuity and preservation of the canonical worldview constructs contained in a concentrated form in the prototext. The genre samples that the aggregate prototext contains are called proto-genres. There are three of them: prayer, preaching and hagiography. In the modern genre system each proto-genre is the substantive and structural basis of a group of genres derived from it, i.e. modern genre types. Each genre type on a generic basis is divided into genres and subgenres. The genre type of modern functional religious style can be represented as a conceptual field. The core of each genre subsystem is made up of genres used in the liturgical sphere; they are as close as possible to the proto-genre in a formal-substantive sense. The periphery of the genre subsystem is made up of genres that function in the non-public sphere; they are distinguished by a certain author’s freedom and at the same time retain their connection with the canonical prototext. The genre subsystems, genetically going back to the proto-genres of prayer, sermon and hagiography, have a common communicative framework (subjects of religious communication belong to different worlds; communication is characterized by reverent tonality in relation to God and other representatives of the sacred world), however, they differ in the direction of communication and the way of textual processing content. Thus, all the three subsystems of the religious style went through the development process, each on its own prototext basis. Prayer, preaching and hagiography continue their active existence in the form of genre groups of the modern religious style. The named genre types maintain a central location in the genre system of religious functional style. Along with it, the periphery of the style is being actively created, formed by genres that do not perform the liturgical functions themselves and are at the intersection with other functional styles. The periphery is constituted by texts with a degree of freedom acceptable for religious Orthodox consciousness that relate to various types of religious activity and ensure the existence of the Church as a social institution of a society. Nevertheless, reliance on prototext is also a characteristic feature of peripheral texts. Peripheral genres arise at the intersection of a religious functional style with other styles. Hybrid genres are especially active in the mass media and on the Internet, where the religious functional style interacts with journalistic and conversational styles. Currently, the sphere of religious confessional journalism and religious Internet communication has taken shape.

Keywords:

religious functional style, constructive principle of prototextuality, protogenres, genres, prayer, sermon, hagiography, subgenres, core, periphery

Averkiy (Taushev), arkhiyepiskop, 2001, Rukovodstvo po gomiletike, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Blazhennaya Matrona Moskovskaya: Swyataya pomoshсhnitsa i uteshitelnitsa, 2011, Moskva
  Google Scholar

Bobyreva Ye. V., 2007, Religioznyy diskurs: tsennosti, zhanry, strategii (na materiale pravoslavnogo veroucheniya), Volgograd.
  Google Scholar

Bugayeva I. V., 2005, Stilisticheskiye osobennosti i zhanry religioznoy sfery. Stilistika teksta, Nizhniy Novgorod.
  Google Scholar

Bugayeva I. V., 2010, Yazyk pravoslavnoy sfery: sovremennoye sostoyaniye, tendentsii razvitiya, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Feodosiy, yepiskop Polotskiy Glubokskiy, 1999, Gomiletika. Teoriya tserkovnoy propovedi, Sergiyev Posad.
  Google Scholar

Itskovich T., Karmanova D., Nikolina N., 2018, Composition and subject structure of the minutes genre in the religious style. The 8-th International Scientific and Practical Conference „Current issues of linguistics and didactics: The interdisciplinary approach in humanities”, SHS Web of Conferences 50, 01207,CILDIAH2018 https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001207
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001207   Google Scholar

Itskovich T. V., 2019, Sistema zhanrov religioznogo stilya v kommunikativno-pragmaticheskom aspekte, „Studia Rossica Posnaniensia”, vol. XLIV. DOI: 10.14746/strp.2019.44.2.21
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/strp.2019.44.2.21   Google Scholar

Itskovich T. V., 2000, Prototekstual’nost’ kak konstruktivnyy printsip religioznogo stilya, „Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2, Yazykoznaniye”, t. 17, № 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2018.1.1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2018.1.1   Google Scholar

Khudyakova Ye. S., 2009, Sotsial’naya obuslovlennost’ sistemy zhanrov i zhanrovoy kompetentsii v tserkovno-religioznoy sfere (na primere tekstov Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi i Ukrainskoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi Moskovskogo Patriarkhata), Perm’.
  Google Scholar

Kładoczny P., 2004, Proroctwa chrześcijańskie jako gatunek mowy na tle innych gatunków profetycznych, Zielona Góra.
  Google Scholar

Kozhina M. N., Duskayeva L. R., Salimovskiy V. A., 2008, Stilistika russkogo yazyka, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Krylova O. A., 2000, Sushchestvuyet li tserkovno-religioznyy (tserkovno-propovednicheskiy) funktsional’nyy stil’ v sovremennom russkom literaturnom yazyke? –Kul’turno-rechevaya situatsiya v sovremennoy Rossii. Voprosy teorii i obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologiy, red. N. A. Kupina, Yekaterinburg, s. 107–117.
  Google Scholar

Krylova O. A., 2001, Mozhno li schitat’ tserkovno-religioznyy stil’ sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka raznovidnost’yu gazetno-publitsisticheskogo?, „Stereotipnost’ i tvorchestvo v tekste”, s. 259–270.
  Google Scholar

Krysin L. P., 1994, Ob odnoy lakune v sisteme funktsional’nykh stiley sovremennogo russkogo yazyka, „Russkiy yazyk v shkole”, № 3, s. 69–77.
  Google Scholar

Krysin, L. P., 1996, Religiozno-propovednicheskiy stil’ i yego mesto v funktsional’no-stilisticheskoy paradigme sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka. –Poetika. Stilistika. Yazyk i kul’tura: pamyati Tat’yany Grigor’yevny Vinokur, red. N. N. Rozanova, Moskva, s. 135–138.
  Google Scholar

Kupina N. A., Matveyeva T. V., 2013, Stilistika sovremennogo russkogo yazyka, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Likhachev D. S., 1971, Poetika drevnerusskoy literatury, Leningrad.
  Google Scholar

Levshun L. V., 2001, Istoriya vostochnoslavyanskogo knizhnogo slova v 11–17 vv., Minsk.
  Google Scholar

Makuchowska M., 1995, Styl religijny. – Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, red. S. Gajda, Opole, s. 449-473.
  Google Scholar

Makuchowska M., 1998, Modlitwa jako gatunek języka religijnego, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Mistrik J., 1992, Religiózty štýl, „Stylistyka” I, s. 82–89.
  Google Scholar

Prokhvatilova O. A., 1999, Pravoslavnaya propoved’ i molitva kak fenomen sovremennoy zvuchashchey rechi, Volgograd.
  Google Scholar

Prokhvatilova O. A., 2007, Tserkovnaya propoved’ kak yadernyy zhanr religioznoy kommunikatsii, „Trudy Nizhegorodskoy Dukhovnoy Seminarii”, № 5, s. 349–368.
  Google Scholar

Rozanova N. N., 2000, Kommunikativno-zhanrovyye osobennosti khramovoy propovedi. Uchenyy. Uchitel’. Lichnost’, Krasnoyarsk, s. 25–41.
  Google Scholar

Rozanova N. N., 2003, Sfera religioznoy kommunikatsii: khramovaya propoved’. – Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk: Sotsial’naya i funktsional’naya differentsiatsiya, red. L. P Krysin, Moskva, s. 341–346.
  Google Scholar

Salimovskiy V. A., Suslova K. S., 2005, Eksplikatsiya dogmata kak zhanra dogmaticheskoy propovedi, „Zhanry rechi”, № 4, s. 280–292.
  Google Scholar

Shevchenko L. L., 2000, Konfesіyniy stil’. – Ukraїns’ka mova: yentsiklopedіya, Kiyev, s. 252–253.
  Google Scholar

Stilisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka, 2003, Moskva.
  Google Scholar

Voytak M., 1998, Proyavleniye standartizatsii v vyskazyvaniyakh religioznogo stilya (na materiale liturgicheskoy molitvy). – Tekst: stereotip i tvorchestvo, red. M. P. Kotyurova, Perm’, s. 214–230. [http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Linguist/Article/Voitak_StandMolitv.php]
  Google Scholar

Voytak M., 2002, Individual’naya realizatsiya zhanrovogo obraztsa propovedi, „Stereotipnost’ i tvorchestvo v tekste”, s. 270–285.
  Google Scholar

Wilkoń А., 2002, Spójność i struktura tekstu. Wstęp do lingwistyki tekstu, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Zhitiya svyatykh Yekaterinburgskoy yeparkhii, 2008, Yekaterinburg.
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-12-18

Cited by

Ickovič, T. V. (2020). The genre system of the religious style. Stylistyka, 29, 55–77. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka29.2020.4

Authors

Tatʹâna V. Ickovič 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5841-2943

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.