Family and education in the religious discourse of Archbishop Luke of Simferopol and Crimea
Abstract
During four decades of his service in the Church, Valentin Felixovich Voino-Yasenetsky (Archbishop Luke of Simferopol and Crimea) delivered numerous sermons, most of which were recorded. Later, they began to appear in the form of publications and became the object of research by representatives of various scientific disciplines. In his sermons, apart from other issues, the preacher paid special attention to the family and education of the younger generation. This article is an attempt to analyze the religious discourse of the Archbishop, using the example of the sermon “On the family and education of children”, delivered by him on 13 October 1947. The author of the sermon adheres to the traditional point of view on marriage and raising children. And this can be confirmed not only by the texts of his sermons, but also by the lifepath the preacher took himself. In this text, Archbishop Luke, in the classical tradition of quotations from the Bible, expresses his attitude towards the issues raised and offers solutions to them. If we take into account the processes going on in the modern world (new views on the institution of marriage, devaluation of marriage and the family, the reluctance of parents to take care of their own children, shifting of responsibility for raising children to other people or state institutions and organizations), it should be noted that, despite the fact that the sermon was delivered more than 70 years ago, it has not lost its relevance and can serve as a reference book for spouses and parents, as revealed by the analysis of the preacher’s discourse. Taking into account the peculiarities of the analyzed genre, the author of this article attempts to look at the text of the sermon from the theolinguistic perspective and, consequently, applies the theolinguistic approach in the process of its analysis and description.
Keywords:
Valentin Felixovich Voino-Yasenetsky, Archbishop Luke, sermon, family, education, linguistic means, theolinguistic approach, religious discourseReferences
Arkhiyepiskop Averkiy (Taushev), 2001, Rukovodstvo po gomiletike, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Bobyreva Ye., 2007, Religioznyy diskurs: tsennosti, zhanry, strategii (na materiale pravoslavnogo veroucheniya): avtoref. diss. … doktora filol. nauk, Volgograd.
Google Scholar
Chikovani T., 2016, Yazykovaya lichnost’ pravoslavnogo propovednika kak znachimyy lingvoformat religioznogo diskursa (na materiale propovedi Arkhiyepiskopa Simferopol’skogoi Krymskogo Luki (Voyno-Yasenetskogo) „Pechal’ yazhe po boze i pechal’ mirskaya”), „Nauchnyy rezul’tat”, seriya: Voprosy teoreticheskoy i prikladnoy lingvistiki, No 1 (7), t. 2, s. 72–75.
Google Scholar
Gadomskaya G., 2019, Otrazheniye lichnosti propovednika v gomileticheskom nasledii Valentina Feliksovicha Voyno-Yasenetskogo (Arkhiyepiskopa Simferopol’skogo i Krymskogoluki). – Nastoyashcheye i budushcheye stilistiki: sb. nauch. st. Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (13–14 maya 2019 g.), nauch. red. Ye. Vartanova; otv. red. N. Klushina, S. Barysheva, Moskva, s. 112–119.
Google Scholar
Gadomskiy A., 2004, O lakunakh v sisteme lingvisticheskoy nauki: problema vzaimodeystviya yazyka i religii, „Kul'tura narodov Prichernomor'ya”, No 49, t. 1, s. 164–167.
Google Scholar
Girich A., protoiyerey, 2011, Sluzheniye svyatitelya Luki (Voyno-Yasenetskogo) na Tambovskoy kafedre (1944–1946 gg.): Diplomnaya rabota po predmetu „Istoriya Russkoy Tserkvi”, Moskva. URL: https://sluzhenie.tomsk.ru/texts/Tambov. pdf (date of access: 25.09.2019).
Google Scholar
Katunin Yu., Zakharov M., 1997, V. F. Voyno-Yasenetskiy – chelovek-legenda, „Kul'tura narodov Prichernomor'ya”, No 1, s. 151–159.
Google Scholar
Khlebda V., 2001, Desakralizatsiya i resakralizatsiya bibleyskoy frazeologii v russkoy pechati poslednego desyatiletiya, „Studia Rossica Posnaniensia”, No 29, s. 123–130.
Google Scholar
Loseva T., 2008, Metafora v rechevom prostranstve propovedi, „Universitetskiye chteniya”, nr 7. URL: http://www.pglu.ru/ lib/ publications/University_Reading/2008/VII/ uch_2008_VII_00031.pdf. (date of access: 10.10.2019).
Google Scholar
Marushchak V., protodiakon, 2007, Svyatitel'-khirurg. Zhitiye arkhiyepiskopa Luki (Voyno-Yasenetskogo), Moskva.
Google Scholar
Maslova V., 2018, Osnovy sovremennoy lingvistiki, Vitebsk.
Google Scholar
Nikolayeva N., Kuz’min S., 2010, Ratnaya simvolika v drevneslavyanskom perevode Pesni Pesney: opyt teolingvisticheskogo analiza, „Uchenyye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta”, t. 152, kn. 6, s. 45–52.
Google Scholar
Popova V., 2010, Spetsifika eticheskoy mysli V. F. Voyno-Yasenetskogo, „Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. A. Nekrasova”, t. 16, No 1, s. 167–170.
Google Scholar
Popovskiy M., 2002, Zhizn’ i zhitiye Luki Voyno-Yasenetskogo, arkhiyepiskopa i khirurga, Sankt-Peterburg.
Google Scholar
Postovalova V., 2016, Naukao yazyke v svete ideala tsel’nogo znaniya: V poiskakh integral’nykh paradigm, Moskva.
Google Scholar
Prokhvatilova O., 2011, Vyrazitel’nyye sredstva sovremennoy pravoslavnoy propovedi, „Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta”, seriya 2: Yazykoznaniye, No 1 (13), с. 7–13.
Google Scholar
Sklyarevskaya G. N., 2016, Leksika sovremennogo russkogo pravoslaviya: tolkovoentsiklopedicheskiy slovar’, Sankt-Peterburg.
Google Scholar
Vetelev A., svyashchennosluzhitel’, 1949, Gomiletika. Kurs akademicheskikh lektsiy po teorii i praktike tserkovno-pravoslavnogo propovednichestva, Moskva–Sergiyev Posad (Zagorsk), (na pravakh rukopisi).
Google Scholar
Zabavnikova Ye., 2016, Publitsistika arkhiyepiskopa Luki (professora V. F. VoynoYasenetskogo) v religiozno-politicheskom kontekste 1940–1950-kh gg.: diss.…kand. filol. nauk, Tambov.
Google Scholar
Statistics
Downloads
License
1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).
2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".
3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.
4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:
a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,
b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,
c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).
d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.
5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.
6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.
7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.
