The style of Latin treatises of Firmicius Maternus and Filaster of Brescia (the 4th century)

Beata Gaj

Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9165-2124

Abstract

The article concerns the formation of a religious style in Christian Latin texts dating from the 4th century of our era. First of all, the style of religious treatises of two authors Firmicus Maternus and Filaster of Brescia, living in the second half of the 4th century, is discussed. The combinations in the same text of a pluralistic philosophical discourse with the unconditional promotion of Christian and Catholic doctrine are of particular interest. For instance, to tighten or soften the message, Firmicus Maternus used Latin pronouns hic, haec, hoc and iste, ista, istud. Saint Filaster of Brescia, on the other hand, began each description of heresy in the style characteristic of descriptions of the lives and views of famous philosophers as if they were suggestions to choose, emphasizing simultaneously that Catholic doctrine was the only true one.

Keywords:

Firmicus Maternus, Filaster of Brescia, philosophical discourse, style

Banterle G., 1991, Introduzione. – Filastrii episcopi Brixiensis diversarum hereseon liber, ed. F. Heylen, G. Banterle, Scriptores circa Ambrosium 2, Milano–Roma, s. 9–18.
  Google Scholar

Bańkowska E., 2003, Z problematyki stylu. – Praktyczna stylistyka nie tylko dla polonistów, red. E. Bańkowska, A. Mikołajczuk, Warszawa, s. 50–78.
  Google Scholar

Bober A., 1965, Antologia patrystyczna, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Bram J. R., 1975, Ancient astrology, theory and practise. The Mathesis of Firmicus Maternus, Park Ridge.
  Google Scholar

Budzanowska-Weglenda D., 2015, Tykoniusz i jego reguły egzegezy biblijnej. Monografia literacka, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Cytowska M., Szelest H., 1994, Literatura rzymska. Okres cesarstwa. Autorzy chrześcijańscy, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Diogenes Laertios. Żywoty i poglądy słynnych filozofów, 1982, przeł. K. Leśniak i in., Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Doroszewski F., 2016, Orgie słów. Terminologia misteriów w „Parafrazie Ewangelii wg św. Jana” Nonnosa z Panopolis, Toruń.
  Google Scholar

Gaj B., 2015, Firmicus Maternus, Jak nieświadomi błądzą w wierze, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Gaj B., 2018, Nietolerancja, error czy hallucinatio – nowe odczytanie dyskursu religijnego z IV w., „Roczniki Humanistyczne”, t. 66, s. 65–78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rh.2018.66.3-4   Google Scholar

Gajda S., 1995, Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, Opole.
  Google Scholar

Groehl F., 1918, De syntaxi Firmiciana, Breslau.
  Google Scholar

Heuten G., 1938, Julius Firmicus Maternus. De errore profanarum religionum, traduction nouvelle avec texte et commentaire, Brussels.
  Google Scholar

Korolko M., 1990, Sztuka retoryki. Przewodnik encyklopedyczny, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Mitosek Z., 2005, Teorie badań literackich, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Perelman Ch., 2002, Imperium retoryki. Retoryka i argumentacja, tłum. M. Chomicz, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Rahn H., 1969, Morphologie der antiken Literatur. Eine Einführung, Darmstadt.
  Google Scholar

Ricken F., 2007, Filozofia religii, przeł. P. Domański, Kęty.
  Google Scholar

Samolewicz Z., 2000, Składnia łacińska, Bydgoszcz.
  Google Scholar

Sapota T., 2001, Magia i religia w twórczości Lucjusza Apulejusza z Madaury. Studium wpływów orientalnych w kulturze rzymskiej w drugim wieku naszej ery, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Skubalanka T., 1984, Historyczna stylistyka języka polskiego. Przekroje, Wrocław.
  Google Scholar

Słownik grecko-polski, 1929, oprac. Z. Węclewski, Lwów.
  Google Scholar

St. Philastrius, 1911. – The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 11, ed. F. J. Bacchus, New York.
  Google Scholar

Szram M., 2016, Geneza herezji wczesnochrześcijańskich w ujęciu Filastriusza z Brescii, „Vox Patrum”, t. 65, s. 631–651.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.3524   Google Scholar

Szram M., 2017, Rygoryzm i laksyzm moralny we wczesnochrześcijańskich ruchach heretyckich na podstawie „Diversarum hereseon Liber” Filastriusza z Brescii, „Roczniki Teologiczne”, 64, z. 4, s. 35–51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rt.2017.64.4-3   Google Scholar

Turcan R., 1982, Introduction. – Firmicus Maternus, De errore profanarum religionum. L’erreur des religions païennes, Paris, s. 10–75.
  Google Scholar

Wolanin H., 2012, Gramatyka opisowa klasycznej łaciny w ujęciu strukturalnym, Kraków.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/9788376386034   Google Scholar


Published
2020-12-20

Cited by

Gaj, B. (2020). The style of Latin treatises of Firmicius Maternus and Filaster of Brescia (the 4th century). Stylistyka, 29, 411–423. https://doi.org/10.25167/Stylistyka29.2020.24

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.