Proměny funkcé obecne češtiny při stylizaci textů

Marie Krćmova




Abstract

The article deals with generał problems conceming specific means of expression from the diachronic point of view, using Common Czech (obecna ćeStina) as an example. It is especially emphasized that during the analysis a complex approach is of particular impor- tance, morę than from the synchronic point of view, also with regard to stylistic examina- tions. When scholars focusing on this particular discipline choose their theoretical background, they should also take into consideration concepts and definitions of Common Czech from both linguistic and sociolinguistic points of view in various periods. They should also choose only relevant means of expression, with sufficient frequency. Furthermore, they need to find texts the stylistic norm of which provides an opportunity to use Common Czech, to some extent or fully (today as well as in the past). Ali these aspects are significant, although their hierarchy may be varied; using identical materiał, it is thus possible to arrive at different generalizations.

Keywords:

stylistics, Common Czech (obecna ćeśtina), its functions in creating texts

Ćermak, P., Sgall, P., Vybiral,P„ 2005, Odśkolske spisovnosti ke standardni ćeśtine. Vyzva k diskusi, “Slovo a Slovestnost” 66, s. 103-115.

Hausenblas K., 1973, Komplexni a simplexni styly. - Poetyka i stylistyka słowiańska, Wrocław

.Hladka, Z., a kol. 2005, Ćeśtina v soućasne soukrome korespondenci. Dopisy, e-maily, SMS, Brno.

Hladka, Z., 2006, Soućasna soukroma korespondence. Korpusove zpracovani a lingvisticke yyużiti, Disertaćni prace obhajena v r. 2006 v Bmć, Rukopis.

Hoffmannova J., 1997, Stylistika a ...Soućasna situace stylistiky, Praha.

Chloupek, J., 1993, Pochybnosti o funkćnich stylech, “SPFFBU” A 41, s. 61-71.

Chloupek, J., 1998, Komunikaćni oblast prostesdelovaci. -Jazyk a kultura vyjadrovani, Brno, s. 43-48.

Chloupek, J., Krćmova, M.,1991, Metajazykovost slovesneho umeni. In Konfrontaćny a komparativny vyskum jazykovej a literarnej komunikacie, Bratislava, s. 29-38.

Jelinek, M., 1965, Definice pojmu „jazykovy styl", “SPFFBU” A 14, s. 43-67.

Jelinek, M., 1966, Postaveni hovoroveho stylu mezi styly funkćnimi, “Slovo a Slovestnost” 27, s. 104-118.

Jelinek, M., 1991, Pojem funkćniho stylu v rećove stylistice. —Synteza w stylistyce słowiańskiej, Opole, s. 13-19.

Jelinek, M., 1992, Pojeti stylu u praźskych strukturalistii, “Ćeska literatura” 30, s. 209-216.

Jelinek, M., 1992, Problematika definice pojmu „styl", „Stylistyka” I, s. 15-26.

Jelinek, M., 1995, Stylistika. - Prirućni mluvnice ćeśtiny, Praha, s. 701-781.

Krćmova, M., 1995, K pramenum specifika mluveneho projevu (Mluvenost, ći spont- annost?), — K diferenciaci soućasneho mluveneho jazyka, Ostrava, s 26-32.

Krćmova, M., 2000, Termin obecna ćeśtina a ruznost jeho chapani. — Ćeśtina. Un- iverzalia a specifika 2, Brno, s. 63-77.

Krćmova, M., 2003, Slohova charakteristika prostredku lexikalnich. - Soućasna ćeska stylistika, Praha, 138-147.

Krćmova, M., 2003, Mhwenost apsanost jako slohotvorne ćinitele. - Sbornikprąci Filozoficko-prirodovedecke fakulty Slezske univerzity v Opave D3, s. 29-35.

Kfistek M., 2000, Pojetistylovepfiznakovosti v soućasne ćeske stylistice, „Stylistika” IX, s. 181-187.

Kristek, M., 2003, Vy brane shody a odliśnosti ćeskeho a anglosaskehopojetistylu a stylistiky. - Sbornikprąci Filozoficko-prirodovedecke fakulty Slezske univerzity v Opave D3, s. 36-47.

Milićkova, L., 2005, La place de la stylistigue dans la linguistique franęaise contempora- ine. - Etudes Romanes de Brno, Brno.

Sgall, P., Hronek, J., 1992, Ćeśtina bez prikras, Praha.

Sgall, P., aj., 1992, Pariation in Language — Code Switching in Czech as a Challenge for Sociolinguistics, Amsterdam-Philadelphia.

Skubalanka, T., 1992, Czy można mówić o istneiniu systemu stylistycznego?, “Stylistyka” I, s. 27-38.

Skubalanka, T., 1995, O definicjach stylu, “Stylistyka” IV, s. 7-23.

Stich, A. 1975, K obecne ćeśtine v soućasne próze, “Nase reć” 58, s. 215-223.

Styl? Moje dzisiejsze rozumienie stylu, “Stylistyka” IV, 1995, s. 223-329.

Śramek, R., ed., 1996, Spisovnost a nespisovnost dnes, Brno.

Published
2021-02-19

Cited by

Krćmova, M. (2021). Proměny funkcé obecne češtiny při stylizaci textů. Stylistyka, 16, 209–219. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/s/article/view/3622

Authors

Marie Krćmova 

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.


License

Copyright (c) 2007 Stylistyka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

1. Copyrights to published works are held by the University of Opole (to the collective work) and the Authors (to individual parts of the collective work that have an independent meaning).

2. Only previously undistributed works can be published in the scientific journal "Stylistics".

3. The University of Opole does not restrict the possibility of the author's further dissemination of his work on condition that the scientific journal "Stylistics" is indicated as the original place of publication and the consent of the University Publishing House.

4. Consent to the publication of the work in the scientific journal "Stylistics" is tantamount to granting the author a non-exclusive license to the University of Opole, including the right to use the work without territorial restrictions and time limits in the following fields of exploitation:

a) within the scope of recording and multiplication of the work - production of any number of copies of the work in whole or in part using a specified technique, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital technique, introduction of the work into computer memory and computer networks,

b) within the scope of circulation of the original or copies on which the work has been recorded - circulation, lending or hiring of the original or copies,

c) within the scope of dissemination of the work in a manner other than specified in item 2 - making the work or its abstract available on the Internet by enabling the recipients to access the work on-line or enabling them to download the work to their own device that makes it possible to read it, placing the work in electronic databases that disseminate scientific works, including in particular the CEEOL database (Central and Eastern Online Libray) and the abstract in English in the CEJSH database (The Central Europaen Journal of Social Scienes and Humanites).

d) within the scope of creating and distributing dependent works created using the work - using them in the fields of exploitation specified in points 1-3.

5. The author is not entitled to compensation for granting the license to the work.

6. The author agrees that the University may grant further permission to use the work (sublicense) in the fields of exploitation specified in par. 2 paragraph 4.

7. The author agrees that, in connection with the distribution of the work, his or her personal information, that is, name, affiliation, and e-mail address, may be made public.